By Linda
Rodriguez
We are living in times when
the former president of the United States tweets out his desire to censor
newspapers, television news programs, entire sections of the press, and
published books. So far, he has not succeeded in this, even though he daily
tweets out his condemnation of “fake news” and his desire to change the libel
laws to undercut the First Amendment, but the situation looks grimmer every
month and week and day.
We are living in times when
the free press is called “the enemy of the people.” We are living in times when
organized political hate groups are attacking books, including Anne Frank’s
diary, in the press, in our schools, in our libraries, and in the courts. In
fact, we are living in times that become more and more reminiscent of the rise
of Nazi Germany than we would like to believe or experience. It reminds me
forcibly of the book burnings of the Nazi regime. Probably because of the
multiple threats to begin burning these banned books they hate so much.
One of the earliest and most
important steps a dictatorship must take is to seize control of the narrative.
Thus, we see the multitude of lies and the constant accusations of fake news.
The next step is censorship, which grants so much control over what the
populace can know, and after censorship comes the destruction of books and
magazines which contain the truth and not the regime’s propaganda. Along with
this, we always find persecution of journalists and writers and poets who are not
willing to spout the regime's line. Unfortunately, history gives us all too
many examples of this through the ages. In the photograph at the top of this
blog, Nazis are burning books in Germany.
This poem is about this
process of banning books, which continues to be a threat down through history.
Not too long ago, we had books by Latino and Native and Black authors banned in
public school districts in the Southwest, which led to a band of activists
gathering those forbidden books and smuggling them across multiple states
into those school districts to educate those children. This was called the
Librotraficante movement and led to the courts reinstating those books in the
school district. We may all be called on again to do something like this to
defend the precious written word. Vigilance is the price of freedom.
SPELL FOR BANNING A BOOK
First, find a censor.
This will be hard—
not that censors are rare,
but they are adept mimics.
Do not be fooled. No matter
how benevolent its disguise,
a frightened censor is
dangerous.
Approach with caution.
To safely capture it
for your spell, you must
circle
the censor chanting soothing
nonsense syllables.
It is meaning that terrifies
censors.
Surround the stupefied
censor
with charms made from
advertising
photographs of a mythical
golden age—
smiling mothers
in high heels and aprons,
silent fathers
keeping sentinel on
horseback, sexless
children never asking
questions. Sacred to the
censor,
such charms have power
to blind it.
Select the book
you want banned.
Set it outside the circle
of charms, and carefully
remove the charm nearest
so the censor can detect
the presence of an attempt
at meaning.
Protect yourself.
Enraged censors have been
known
not only to ban books
but to burn them
and then press on to people.
Published in Dark Sister (Mammoth Publications,
2018)
Rodriguez is past chair of AWP
Indigenous Writer’s Caucus and Border Crimes chapter of Sisters in Crime,
founding board member of Latino Writers Collective and The Writers Place, and member
of Native Writers Circle of the Americas, Wordcraft Circle of Native American
Writers and Storytellers, and Kansas City Cherokee Community. http://lindarodriguezwrites.blogspot.com.
I grew up during McCarthyism and Jim Crow. It is important to note that censors are the minority. They win when their lies are accepted by a silent majority who does not look past the headlines that minority produces to learn the truth.
ReplyDeleteLast fall, two candidates for the school board were backed by a national PAC. They proposed cutting funds and parental control of the curriculum. After a hard-fought election, we voted them down.
ReplyDeleteThe best story I've read about censoring books: a young person running for local office told a woman who demanded banning books to read the two hundred books on her list and cite, by page and paragraph, all material she found offensive. Never heard from her again.
Most libraries have a process for those who wish to have a book removed from our collections. It generally involves meeting with a librarian to express concerns, and if that meeting doesn't help them understand the library's role in providing materials for everyone in the community, the complainant can fill out a form and meet with administration. We rarely had anyone progress beyond the meeting stage.
ReplyDeleteI suspect that very few of today's book banners have read the books they wish to ban. My take as a former librarian is, it's a parent's job to monitor their child's reading and social media, not anyone else's, not the town, not the school, not a librarian. Sheesh. Do your own work.
Jim, you are absolutely correct! I, too, remember those days when the Catholic Church banned books for its members, and “banned in Boston” could famously create bestsellers.It's more extreme now with much more vitriol oh, and I certainly don't remember actual threats to burn books back in my childhood in the late 50s and early 60s.
ReplyDeleteMargaret, that's a great example of the fact that most of these people have not actually read the books that they want to ban. A lot of them aren’t very good readers.
ReplyDeleteExactly, Shari. What about the parents who want their children to read a wide variety of inclusive and thought-provoking books to help expand their minds and educate them about the world in which they live?
ReplyDeleteHard to get my mind around the concept that preventing people from accessing ideas will somehow make the world a better place.
ReplyDeleteTimely, and frightening. Well said, Linda.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this, Linda.
ReplyDeleteIn the 90s, when I ran an independent bookstore in Tennessee, we started many good conversations with customers every year with our banned and challenged book displays. Our public library puts up a great display each year, too. In each case, bookstore and library, the displays have to be constantly restocked. Good!
The reasons for the bans and challenges are eye-opening, mind-boggling, sad, reprehensible - the list of adjectives is limitless. The best adjective, though, is wrong. Banning books is wrong.
Blood boiling, here, keyboard taking unasked for pounding. Thank you for writing about this, Linda.
KM, yes, it's not exactly the way people like us think about books and reading and education. But there are always people who are threatened by these things and by the opening of minds that books and ideas can create.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Kait. I actually hate the fact that it's a timely topic once again.
ReplyDeleteMolly, I'm not surprised that you had to constantly restock those Banned Book displays. Most people in America are really opposed to censorship and the banning of books, let alone the burning of books, but they don't think about the fact that there are always these right-wing extremists out there looking for an excuse to do this until it gets really bad and smacks them in the face. Like most of us, they would rather think that such idiocy does not exist in our current world.
ReplyDelete