I complained in an earlier blog that my computer bridge partner was cheating. The program has been updated. It is now spiffy and shiny. And it still cheats.
Thinking you might find that hard
to believe, I have been gathering examples. On one hand where I had 14 points and five spades I bid one
Spade. That’s pretty much standard
for a hand like that. My program
had the first opponents pass, my partner pass and the second opponent pass. I
took ten tricks, enough for a game in Spades. I was scored at the bottom of the rankings. At the top were people who made the
same number of trick as I did.
They played the hand in four Spades. Either their programs did not pass in response to the
opening bid or a boatload of people opened with a highly non-standard four
Spades.
Several time the program has bid
four Diamonds or Clubs over my three no trump bid. In other words, the program committed us to take more tricks
for fewer points. Three no trump is
enough for “game.” The desired
outcome of the game is to win more “games and slams” (either losing only one trick
or winning every trick) than others who play identical hands. You get a score that compares your result to the
results of other players. The program’s
explanation each time for the woeful bid was that the program was telling me it
had control of the suit mentioned.
Useful information I suppose, if given before we reached the level of
game.
Blackwood is a convention that
allows someone to ask how many aces or kings his or her partner has. The
program bid us up to a level where any bidder knows we don’t have enough high
cards to win. For example the
program bid six hearts; a bid that promises we will take all the tricks except
one. That bid by the program came
after the Blackwood Convention that showed we were missing two aces. Guess how
many tricks I lost. Two.
Of course the program also
sometimes jumps from my three no trump bid to six no trump without even asking
for information to ignore before bidding.
When the program goes wacky my
score crashes into the dumpster as if I had misplayed or over-bid the hand. I do misplay hands. I accept a low
score when I earn it. When my
electronic partner bids poorly I talk at the machine. It does no good, but then I feel better.
In the new program scoring at 52% allows the player to advance to the new level. When I got to 51.7%, the program bid two hands in a row at a level that I could not have made even if I had control of all four hands in the match, Maybe the programmer is a sadist.
In the new program scoring at 52% allows the player to advance to the new level. When I got to 51.7%, the program bid two hands in a row at a level that I could not have made even if I had control of all four hands in the match, Maybe the programmer is a sadist.
I don’t recall humiliating any
computer programmers. Maybe the
program knows that I was impolite in a former life and is getting revenge.
Does anybody out there know how to effectively
threaten a computer?
With a hammer. But it's only effective if you actually follow through.
ReplyDeleteI often threaten to throw my computer out the window. I haven't actually done it, but it's just matter of time.
ReplyDeleteI don't play any games on the computer, but often my computer acts like contrary and it's so annoying.
ReplyDeleteI don't have time to play computer games. So many people on facebook invite me to play games, but again, I don't have time. Whenever I feel like throwing my computer against a wall usually it is because the hourglass icon comes up spinning and won't finish the task. I don't have time to wait around for my computer to find itself!
ReplyDeleteWarren -- find a better bridge program. Lots of good ones out there -- or play live bridge on sites such as BridgeBaseOnline.
ReplyDelete~ Jim