I hate
conflict and made one of the worst career decisions in history. I became a
lawyer. It didn’t take long to confirm my personality and career path were not
in sync.
Not
leveraging my legal education in a career would have compounded the bad
decisions, except for one thing: Going to law school was the best place to
learn how to write. Eventually, I began to write thrillers and realized that writing a well-paced and cogent thriller is very much
like writing a well-articulated and succinct brief.
Lawyers
are a cagy bunch. We choose words very carefully. A LOT of research goes into a
good brief because a lawyer has to know what she’s up against. A legal brief
encapsulates an entire world. The brief contains the foundation of facts and
law for each persuasive argument used to win a case. All the details and
supporting evidence must be present, or the case falls apart. A well-written
thriller does the same thing. An author creates a world populated with
characters with points of view, cajoles the reader into that perspective, and
persuades them that the life and death moments are real. Manipulation has never
been so blatant or so much fun.
I see the
similarities as follows:
1. Opposing
counsel is your discerning reader.
I value
the intelligence of my readers and I construct my plots so everything hangs
together in a logical progression. A good opposing counsel, just like the
critical reader, is waiting for that one forgotten fact or that one logical
over-extension of an argument that could cut everything off at the knees. The
written work cannot contain any loose threads that, if pulled, unravel the
whole darned thing. Any overreaching or mischaracterization is giving clover to
the opposition (read: vociferous critic). No attorney wants to make picking
apart finely honed arguments easy. I write for readers who progress through
plots with a fine-toothed comb, just like a judge would, too.
2. A well-constructed thriller is like a well-constructed
brief.
A brief contains
three sections. The first section is the Statement
of Facts. It sets the stage and defines the capsule in which the Argument
resides. A good thriller starts the same way by setting the stage and defining
the world within which the reader’s expectations grow. The clever writer subtly
triggers biases to label named parties as “good” or “bad.” All the pertinent
information is loaded up here.
The next
section is the Argument. This section
takes the facts and fleshes them out with additional cases, supporting law and
perspectives, and keeps the end in mind with each sentence. A thriller evolves
by expanding the initial statement of the plot and weaves in other information,
pulling the reader along with a clear purpose in mind.
The final section of the
brief is the Summation. This is where
the writer weaves together the stated facts and cited law into a final and ironclad
presentation of the case. Doubt has no wiggle room. Guilty or innocent? Custody
granted to taken away? The thriller knits all of the characters and plot points
into a believable and airtight climax.
3. Never lose sight of who your audience is and the
direction of your argument or story.
In both a
brief and a thriller, always keep what
you are writing and who you are
writing for in the forefront of your mind. Use your reader's world view to
shape how a sentence is crafted. Are you writing to a criminal lawyer or to a
family attorney in divorce court? Are you writing to a young adult audience or
to lovers of erotica? That first kiss will look a lot different depending upon
who will be reading it. Sculpt each sentence to persuade and manipulate the
reader. Coerce without them feeling persuaded or manipulated.
Law school was my writing boot camp. There, I inhaled
information and exhaled legal arguments. An author inhales much of the same information
but exhales a story.
Trust me,
exhaling stories is a lot more fun.
The Troubles continues
the story of The Charity.
Jessica
Wyeth refuses to be a fugitive hiding under assumed identities. Through sheer
grit, she struggles to reclaim her life only to discover what she wants
is an illusion. She is not the child of the picture-perfect New England
family, but an unwanted castaway. Her frail and reclusive aunt died without
exposing the secret that she was Jessica’s mother. Jessica travels to
Ireland—her mother’s home—to learn why.
When Jessica
rides in a world-class steeplechase, she is unwittingly used as an accomplice
in a devastating bombing in an English shopping mall. The group behind the
bombing is the Charity, a generations old support network of the IRA. Michael
Conant, reluctant heir to the Charity and Jessica’s lover, must choose his
allegiance to his violent family legacy or the woman he loves. Meanwhile,
Jessica’s fight for her life leads her to uncover her mother’s secrets and the
divided soul of the Irelands.
The Troubles
is a high-concept suspense novel that views the conflict in Northern Ireland
through the prism of American involvement. This sweeping, multi-generational
tale gives witness to the delicate and dangerous layers inside an
ever-unfolding world.
Connie
Johnson Hambley grew up on a small dairy farm just north of New York City. When
she was five years old, an arsonist burned her family’s barn to the ground.
Memories from that experience grew the stories that have become The Charity and The Troubles.
Hambley uses every bit of personal experience to create a
story that is as believable as it is suspenseful. Leveraging her law and
investment background in ways unique, creative, but not altogether logical, she
has enjoyed robust professional pursuits that include writing for Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Massachusetts High Tech, and Nature Biotechnology. Proving that truth
can be stranger than fiction, her experience at a major bank in Boston
introduced her to the clever schemes people dream up to launder money.
Hambley writes about strong women from their perspective in
situations that demand the most from them. No special powers, no gadgets, no
super human abilities. Just a woman caught up or embroiled in something that
she has to get out of, hopefully alive.
Hambley writes page-turners and The Charity is the first in a series. Its sequel, The Troubles was released in May 2015.
Look for updates and information on facebook.com/thecharitythriller and
www.conniejohnsonhambley.com.
A number of my favorite writers are lawyers, and you give a good oversight into why and how they can write so well.
ReplyDeleteWhen I was a child, supporting the IRA was always a whispered topic of conversation among my relatives. They did, however, make an effort to leave the next generation out of the conflict, rather than passing on a legacy.
I'll keep this in mind while I'm reading courtroom procedurals. I've heard that legal writing is a tough law school class. Do lawyers continue to improve their brief writing during their careers?
ReplyDeleteIn the seventies I worked on Cape Cod during college summers. There was always talk of local (financial) support for the IRA.
I had never given it any consideration before your blog, but after reading it, I like your comparison between writing a brief and a crime novel. Thanks for the perspective.
ReplyDelete~ Jim
Why do they call them briefs when the finished documents are anything but brief?
ReplyDeleteHeavens! Being late to the courtroom would result in prejudicing the case! Sorry all for my late arrival. (I blame it on celebrating my daughter's 18th birthday. You know, adult coronation and all that...)
ReplyDeleteThat said...
KM: Thank you. One theme in The Troubles follows what you said - Parents may not want to pass on a legacy of violence, but learned hatreds are difficult to overcome. Look at our U.S. history. George Washington and his band of patriots were HATED by the Brits and considered rebels and terrorists by them. It's all in the perspective.
Margaret: Most lawyers really suck at writing. They use too many words to cloud the fact they don't have a concise argument. The good ones know how to lop off pages to get to the meat. Like us writers, it's all about the craft.
James: Thank you. For me, good structure leads to a good book. Strategic building of a story is equally as important as good writing. The skeleton must be sound or the muscles can't work well.
Warren: Ha! So true! Most courts have a page limit and formatting mandates which dramatically cut down what lawyers would WANT to submit! Fifty pages and anything after that is TOSSED! Hair pulling and freak outs are common.