Rejection Letters 1 by Warren Bull
Alex Carter at Mental Floss provides authors everywhere with hope by sharing some of the
rejection letters sent to great writers by publishers who missed the
opportunity to publish what later became very successful books. I say, let’s
rise from our hot keyboards, and shake our hands in the air as we shout, “Write
on!”
Famous Authors and Their Rejections
by
Alex Carter at Mental Floss
It’s hard to think that authors who have sold millions of
books could ever have been rejected, but everyone had to start somewhere.
HERMAN MELVILLE
Melville's
masterpiece, Moby-Dick, was turned down by multiple publishers,
some of whom had creative suggestions for the author. Peter J. Bentley of
Bentley & Son Publishing House wrote: "First, we must
ask, does it have to be a whale? While this is a rather delightful, if somewhat
esoteric, plot device, we recommend an antagonist with a more popular visage
among the younger readers. For instance, could not the Captain be struggling
with a depravity towards young, perhaps voluptuous, maidens?"
Melville nevertheless got his tale of futile revenge
published—by none other than Richard Bentley, of Bentley & Son. (The
American edition debuted less than a
month later.) That said, the author still made some serious sacrifices, paying for the
typesetting and plating himself.
ERNEST HEMINGWAY
The Sun Also Rises is perhaps Hemingway's most widely
read work, but not everyone was a fan. In 1925, Moberley Luger of
publisher Peacock & Peacock wrote to the 26-year-old author: "If I may
be frank — you certainly are in your prose — I found your efforts to be both
tedious and offensive. You really are a man’s man, aren’t you? I wouldn’t be
surprised to hear that you had penned this entire story locked up at the club,
ink in one hand, brandy in the other. Your bombastic, dipsomaniac, where-to-now
characters had me reaching for my own glass of brandy."
It's a harsh assessment—though from what we know of
Hemingway, it proposes a scenario that is not unlikely either. Still, this
rejection hardly damaged his career. The novel would be published by Scribner's
the following year.
GEORGE
ORWELL
Sometimes fellow writers
give the thumbs down. In 1944, T.S. Eliot was working at Faber & Faber and
wrote a largely apologetic rejection of Animal Farm to George Orwell that included this appraisal:
"… we have no conviction (and I am sure none of the other directors would
have) that this is the right point of view from which to criticize the the political situation at the present time … Your pigs are far more intelligent
than the other animals, and therefore the best qualified to run the farm—in
fact, there couldn’t have been an animal farm at all without them: so that what
was needed, (someone might argue), was not more communism but more
public-spirited pigs.”
The work was rejected by at least four publishers before
making it into print in August 1945.
KENNETH GRAHAME
“An irresponsible holiday
story that will never sell.”
This might possibly be the most whimsical description ever of
the adventures of Mole, Rat, Toad, and Badger in the best-selling children's
tale The Wind In The Willows.
H.G. WELLS
“An endless nightmare. I
think the verdict would be ‘Oh don’t read that horrid book.’”
Despite this editor's take on The War of The Worlds, the tale of alien invasion is still in print nearly 120
years later.
JOSEPH
HELLER
“I haven’t the foggiest
idea about what the man is trying to say. Apparently, the author intends it to
be funny.”
Joseph Heller decided to name his satirical book about
World War II after the 22 rejections he
received: Catch-22.
KURT
VONNEGUT
“We have been carrying out
our usual summer house-cleaning of the manuscripts on our anxious bench and in
the file, and among them I find the three papers which you have shown me as
samples of your work. I am sincerely sorry that no one of them seems to us well
adapted for our purpose. Both the account of the bombing of Dresden and your
article, 'What’s a Fair Price for Golden Eggs?' have drawn commendation
although neither one is quite compelling enough for final acceptance."
Sent to Kurt Vonnegut by Atlantic
Monthly in response to three writing samples, this is one of
the more pleasant rejection letters. Vonnegut turned the Dresden bombing
account into Slaughterhouse-Five.
MARCEL
PROUST
“I rack my brains why a
chap should need thirty pages to describe how he turns over in bed before going
to sleep.”
To be fair, Marcel Proust’s Remembrance of Things Past is 1.5 million words long, so perhaps
this is a reasonable question.
One very helpful rejection I got was from
the publisher who later accepted and published my first book. I am so happy it
was not published in the awful version that I submitted first. Do you have any happy rejection
stories?
Not letters, just silence.
ReplyDeleteLike you, Warren, I'm so glad the early submissions of my work didn't get published. After reading those rejection letters, I'm glad that if a publisher or agent wasn't interested in my work they just didn't reply. No damaged ego that way.
ReplyDeleteAt least in a more genteel time, authors did get a letter back for all their efforts. Today's business is pretty cold.
ReplyDeleteI had a friend who papered one wall of his office with rejection letters.
ReplyDeleteI could easily paper my wall with rejections as well. But they are always polite. So I guess I'm fortunate. They also make me appreciate acceptances that much more.
ReplyDelete