It started with my False Bottom (Seamus McCree #6) proofreaders.
My ARC readers jumped in with two feet. When the local postmistress buttonholed
my better half, Jan, I knew I had a strategic issue to address.
Each novel, novella, and short story in the Seamus McCree
series has its own narrative arc, but the series itself has a larger arc. At
the end of each tale, questions remain—not about the action in that one—about
how something will affect Seamus and his family in the future. Some of the
novels have a specific hook to a future book. I say future advisedly because
the hook from Ant Farm (Seamus McCree #1), although it receives a
nodding reference in Bad Policy (Seamus McCree #2), does not come to fruition
until Empty Promises (Seamus McCree #5).
I’m not about to provide any spoilers, but it gives nothing
away to confirm that at the end of False Bottom, the reader will recognize
that I have left multiple issues for Seamus and his family to address. Perfect
fodder for future books.
As I demonstrated with Ant Farm, I’m willing to let
readers stew for a while before resolving open issues. My writing plan called
for me to write a spin-off series featuring one of the secondary characters
from an early Seamus McCree novel. Truth is, I’d like the experience of a big
publisher contract and marketing, and that won’t happen with the Seamus McCree
series (although many fans have suggested Seamus would make a great television series
. . .I’m up for offers . . .).
So, once I finished False Bottom, my intent was to
work on the second draft of the first novel in the new series. And, if False
Bottom gained enough readers and reviews to make me think another novel was
worth my time, I had an idea for it: I’d return Seamus to his camp in
Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and have the story revolve around his granddaughter,
Megan.
Perfect until the proofreaders asked, “Who is she?”
And they—and the ARC readers—predicted (without consulting me or despite
consulting me) that the next novel would answer the question. Well, I had other
plans that required them to wait for their answer.
Until Linda, my postmistress, told Jan she read False
Bottom over the weekend and wanted to know who she was. When, she asked,
was Jim coming out with the next one to answer that question?
2021 was not an acceptable answer.
As readers posted reviews on Amazon and Goodreads and
contacted me by email, it became clear that if I waited two years to provide
answers, I would piss off not only my rabid readers, but even folks who had
read only False Bottom.
I thought my priorities were the new series and bringing
Seamus back to his U.P camp. But they were not lining up well with my readers’ wish
to find out who she is.
I caved. I will answer (Well, maybe. You never can be
sure—this is me, after all.) my readers’ pressing question by writing a
novella. It’s current working title is Furthermore. It takes place three
weeks after False Bottom ends. Set in Boston, it will address both the
complication hinted at in the last chapter of False Bottom and the
burning question—Who is she?
I mentioned my decision to one proofreader, and she wanted
to know when she would get it to proofread. When I demurred, she suggested she
could set up a writing schedule for me. Talk about motivated. I expect to
finish the first draft next week.
What do you think? Am I wise to accede to my readers, or
should I have ignored the hubbub and worked on the spinoff?
* * * * *
James
M. Jackson authors the Seamus McCree series. False Bottom, the sixth novel in the series—this one set in the Boston
area—was first available in May. You can sign
up for his newsletter and find more information about Jim
and his books at https://jamesmjackson.com/index.html.
I'm one of your readers asking "Who is she?" Let's get a move on this, Jim.
ReplyDeleteGo for it. Don't lose your readers or their emotional investment in your characters.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely answer the readers questions! We are waiting - who is she?
ReplyDeleteStatus update: later today or tomorrow at the latest, I'll type "THE END" to draft one of the novella.
ReplyDeleteI love how you leave us dangling … but I think you've nailed it with the novella to keep everyone invested.
ReplyDeleteYour readers are always worth listening to.
ReplyDeleteThis is hilarious--your proofreader is setting up your writing schedule! I think a novella is the perfect solution. You're almost pleasing everyone, including yourself. It's great to be complained to! It means you're being noticed.
ReplyDeleteI just finished False Bottom. Maybe I'm misreading the clues or reading too much into them, but I thought it was pretty clear "who she is."
ReplyDelete