After a month off
to promote my new book, I’m back to share the final weeks of my FBI Citizens
Academy experience with you.
The sixth
installment covered a lot of ground including International Operations, Weapons
of Mass Destruction, Public Corruption, Polygraph/Statement Analysis, and a
Tour of the Mobile Cyber Forensics Lab.
Is it any wonder
my head was ready to explode? Here are just a few of my takeaways.
International
Operations – The FBI has worked abroad since 1940. Those agents are called
legal attachés, “legat” for short. The FBI has primary US jurisdiction when a
terrorist incident occurs overseas. Those investigations are coordinated with
the Department of State and are conducted with local law and ground rules
established by the host country.
Weapons of
Mass Destruction – This is one of those topics that will keep you awake at
night. The FBI works to educate those who work with chemicals or biologicals to
get out in front of a threat. They have an early warning network in place with
businesses such as Home Depot where someone could purchase large quantities of the
materials used in bomb-making.
Public
Corruption – The definition of Public Corruption is when a public official
abuses his public office for private gain and is among the most sensitive of
investigations.
I’m leaving that
topic right there.
My favorite part
of the evening was the presentation on Detection of Deception. This is
the stuff any of us who write crime fiction that involves questioning a witness
or suspect needs to know. Here are a few tidbits from my notes:
When interviewing
a suspect, you want to build a rapport with them. Therapy techniques are used.
The subject makes
reasonable justification for otherwise criminal acts. Example: “I didn’t steal
money for drugs. I stole it to help my family.”
Repressed emotion
comes to the surface in some sort of body movement.
What’s coming out
of their mouths differs from what’s going on in their heads.
A lie is
“cognitive tasking.” (Think about it. The truth requires no real brain power,
but the creation of a lie, and remembering the lie that’s been created, requires
a lot of mental activity.)
The interviewer
watches for inadvertent body “leakage,” meaning movement, activity, and expressions
that give away the “cognitive tasking” going on.
The subject may
use “pacifiers” or soothing mechanisms such as grooming gestures or nose rubs
(in men) or playing with the hair (in women and girls).
Yawning is an
indicator the subject has checked out, and the interviewer needs to re-engage.
A subject, who
intends to lie, goes through a thought process when asked a question: Hearing
>>> memory recall >>> judgment >>> fear, anxiety
>>> planning (the lie) >>> verbal response.
The best
indicators of deception in response to an open-ended question is equivocation,
meaning use of words like “probably,” “maybe,” “I assume,” “somewhat,” “I may
have,” or “as best I can recall.” And negation, using phrases such as “I
don’t know” or “I’m not sure.”
A subject who’s
being deceptive will use “text bridges” such as “after that,” “the next thing I
knew,” “later on,” or “afterwards.” In these cases, they’re covering up what
they don’t want to talk about by skipping over it.
A final note, and
something I’d never thought about, pertains to written statements. If a subject
is willing, have him write out his statement first. They’re “uncontaminated”
and will often contain tidbits the subject volunteers without realizing.
We wrapped up the
very long evening with a tour of the Mobile Cyber Forensics Lab, a van
with all the gadgets, gizmos, and toys you’d imagine!
My big takeaways
from this talk was you can never truly delete your information from old phones
(do you donate or dispose of your old cell phones? BAD IDEA.) And do you have
Bluetooth in your vehicle? Or do you connect your phone to your rental cars to
use the GPS? The next person to own that car or anyone else who rents it, could
potentially access everything (everything) from your phone as a result.
Scary, huh?
Next time: CSI
Night at the FBI Citizens Academy!
Thanks for taking us with you to the FBI Citizens Academy. It was a fun trip. I wrote that down without being questioned, so it must be all true.
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure, Jim.
ReplyDeleteFascinating! I've enjoyed "sharing" your FBI experience.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad, Margaret!
ReplyDeleteThis is so cool! I loved the part on deception and building rapport. Those are techniques I've learned for the day job in interviewing trial witnesses and I was pleased to see some familiar friends in your material.
ReplyDeleteKait, there was a fabulous workshop on interrogation techniques at Writers Police Academy a couple of years ago too. Same information, different sources.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing all of this with us, Annette. It sounds like a wonderful experience.
ReplyDeleteIt really was, KM.
ReplyDeleteInteresting stuff, Annette. I found myself taking notes.
ReplyDelete