I haven’t watched television in decades with the exception
of some PBS shows for which I’d buy the videos and a couple of shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer that my youngest son inveigled me into watching on DVD with
him. (He used to require Buffy-watching as his payment for help fixing my
computer problems.) This wasn’t one of those judge-y things where someone lets
you know that they’re too intellectually superior to watch what everyone else
is watching. It was simply a matter of priorities. I made the choice of writing
over television back when I was trying to carve out regular time to write.
After eight years in another state at grad school, that
youngest son is back home living with us for a while until he pays off some
debt and moves into his permanent abode. With him, he brought a big-screen TV
and Netflix—and the same desire to have me watch his favorite shows along with
him. So I’ve been watching more TV in the past few weeks than in the past ten
years.
He likes some of the true-crime docudramas like Disappeared and Hardcover Mysteries. Hardcover
Mysteries, in particular, has appealed to me since it features actual
mystery authors discussing actual murder cases that have fascinated them. David
Baldacci, Lisa Scottoline, Sandra Brown, Linda Fairstein, Sara Paretsky have
all discussed in detail real-life cases, along with interviews of the actual
law enforcement officials who investigated the cases.
Over and over, the authors have said, “If I used that in one
of my novels, my editor would tell me to rewrite it because it’s too
farfetched.” And they’re right. Some of the things these murderers do are so
bizarre and over-the-top that they could never be used in a book that’s trying
to be believable fiction. But recently on one of these shows a chief of police
said something that goes to the heart of why it’s hard to just use a real
murder as a basis of a mystery or thriller without major fictional changes. He
said, “The real reason people kill other people and commit other major crimes
is that they’re stupid. I’ve seen it again and again. They’re so stupid that
murder looks like an easy solution to whatever problem they’re dealing with.
And that’s why they get caught and end up in prison. I don’t know what you can
do about it, though. You can’t fix stupid.”
I think he’s probably right on the mark here. Our local
Border Crimes chapter of Sisters in Crime brings in law enforcement officials, private
investigators, prosecutors, defense lawyers, you name it. (Here you see a photo
of our own Warren Bull being handcuffed and leg-cuffed by the head of the U.S.
Marshals Service in our region during one of those programs.) If someone plays
a role in investigating, enforcing, or trying criminal cases, we’ve had them
visit and talk to us about what they’ve encountered in their careers—and we’ve
heard that police chief’s words echoed again and again. Most people become
criminals and murderers because, in one way or another, they’re stupid. Even or
especially the ones who think they’re being smart about it.
I can’t write mysteries about people who commit murder
because they’re stupid, however. Sometimes in the field of noir, you can base a
book on hapless, dumb murderers, but you can’t do it often, or you’ll lose your
readers. Readers want a real antagonist, someone with brains and abilities, not
someone like one of these real murderers who commit murder because they can’t
think of any other options or they think it will be an easy out. Much as I try
to research meticulously and make my books as realistic as possible, I have to
violate reality and have intelligent killers who are a true match for my
protagonists and pose the real danger that they might get away with heinous
crimes.
Many years ago, a law enforcement official whose name I no
longer remember, said at a writers conference I attended that, nine times out
of ten, murderers were caught and convicted because of stupid mistakes, and
he’d come to believe that was because really smart people found other, less
dangerous ways to deal with whatever problems they encountered than murder. But
that won’t work for crime writers because we can work wonders on plot and
characterization, but even we can’t fix stupid.
Have you read mysteries you enjoyed where the murderer was
not so bright?
The best I can say for individuals who can find few options is that they may be crafty even if they are “stupid.”
ReplyDeleteHowever, with organized crime, murder is often an intentional strategy. Not only does it “eliminate” a problem, it sends a message to others about what happens when someone crosses the organization.
~ Jim
Carl Hiaisen does a nice job with less than brilliant antagonists. I guess he frames the murders in such bizarre, absurd situations that it works. Solving the mystery is only part of the ride.
ReplyDeleteJim, that's true about organized crime, but again, stupid. That's always been one of the reasons that crime bosses get taken down legally is someone who's afraid for his life turns state's evidence against them.
ReplyDeleteCarla, yes. Hiassen is the best of some who write funny mysteries that focus on inept criminals.
ReplyDeleteI can't remember reading a murder mystery in which the killer was stupid. Not many authors write stupid villains. I stopped reading Konrath because his villains were sick and perverted--the books gave me nightmares. I think it is the real senseless killings that bother me the most. I certainly wouldn't be entertained by reading about them in fiction. Most people read to take them away from reality. Some of these crimes the police never solve because there is no logic that even they can follow. We hope that the killers are stupid enough to leave evidence behind. It's the total lack of values that frightens me the most. Human life isn't valued. Of course this also says that the killer doesn't value his own life all that much either.
ReplyDeleteDon Westlake's Dortmunder and his bunch come to mind. Many of them aren't all that bright, but they do manage to not get caught. Although they seldom manage to effectively carry out thier schemes, either. I love his books.
ReplyDeleteOne real-life comment about stupid vs. smart criminals--a lot of crimes are never solved (not particularly useful to us, though) I have known some pretty smart killers--usually, it was a crime of passion or the killer was so upset at the time he didn't care if he was caught. One fellow, probably a serial killer, had one manslaughter conviction. He'd talk about that, but not about the other 20 or so killings he was originally charged with. He said he'd learned his lesson--which was never kill anybody much bigger than you unless you'd thought out how to dispose of the body beforehand.
Help! Who has the key?
ReplyDeleteLinda, I can't think of any books I've read with a stupid killer, but then I probably have and forgotten them. However, I so often read about really stupid crooks in the newspaper that I have to shake my head over it.
ReplyDeleteI don't like to read books with a psychopath as a murderer, nor will I ever write that kind of murderer. I want my villains to be reasonably intelligent with a reason for committing the murder.
Like you, the only TV I watch is a few good shows on PBS and especially their mysteries. Otherwise, I spend my evenings reading.
Warren, you should call Linda. She probably has it.
EB, I think the stupidity and the insensitivity to the value of others' lives goes together quite a lot.
ReplyDeleteKM, I think most of the serial killers (as in "rakes," recreational killers, as the FBI calls them) fall in a different category, along with assassins. Both categories tend to be quite intelligent. But people who kill for criminal purposes or out of jealousy or anger (who are the usual antagonists of mystery novels) tend, in real life, to be stupid. And these are the murders we write about because motiveless murders and serial killings make for a whole different novel experience. That's why serial killer novels is considered its own subgenre.
ReplyDeleteWarren, you were such a good sport about it. I wish we had a photo of your with the ankle cuffs on as well. He looks like quite an evil perpetrator, doesn't he?
ReplyDeleteYes, Gloria. I will read some of the serial killer novels, if they're well-written. But I leave alone the books where the violence is so graphic and gratuitous that it deserves the term "torture porn."
ReplyDeleteLOL! I couldn't tell that was Warren in the photo. Did anyone ever unlock him, or will Warren have to develop a whole new typing technique?
ReplyDeleteEB, I had just stepped down as president of our local chapter and Warren had just taken over when we had the Chief Deputy US Marshal come. He stated he always demonstrated these on the head of the organization. I was SO glad we hadn't had him as our guest a month earlier! Warren handled it with panache, of course, and even tried to run a little in the leg chains.
ReplyDeleteI wish I could have seen the demonstration with Warren. That's good information to know.
ReplyDeleteThe Chrstmas short stories by Barb Goffman and B.K. Stevens, that I wrote about in my last blog of the short story series in 2013, featured dumb criminals as narrators. In each case, the story was about a dumb criminal who thought he was smart and, by the end of the story, realized that he wasn't.
I, too, thought (with pleasure) of Hiassen and Westlake and Evanovich. The stupid criminal - especially one with bravado - makes for a fun read, but I prefer the crafty killer who is a worthy foil for the detective. I just saw this quote by Sarah Caudwell on Facebook: "It seems to us that the readers who want fiction to be like life are considerably outnumbered by those who would like life to be like fiction.” It is disheartening to think that people do such dreadful things because they're too dumb to figure out an alternative.
ReplyDeleteWarren - you are rocking those chains!
The 1975 movie, Dog Day Afternoon, comes to mind but it was based on a real crime with inept criminals that went horribly awry. I can't think of a mystery author other than Carl Hiaasen who regularly writes about incompetent criminals.
ReplyDeleteI thought I spotted Warren on America's Most Wanted. Run, Warren!
Here is a true life one from the other side of the state. If you pitched any parts of it your editor would tell you fiction only lets you stretch things so far.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.outsports.com/2013/2/20/4011120/mike-danton-murder-for-hire
My favorite part, going to a 19 year old hockey groupie to hire a hit man.
Paula, I imagine Warren can now write with complete authenticity a character shackled by the US Marshal's Service who tries to escape. (The Chief Deputy Marshal told us that in federal prisons you can often see prisoners in the exercise yard tying their feet together with shoestrings to practice running in shackles.
ReplyDeleteShari, yes! "It is disheartening to think that people do such dreadful things because they're too dumb to figure out an alternative." Exactly the way I feel about it.
ReplyDeleteYes, Kara. In Cold Blood was another book and movie based on horrifying but ultimately dumb murderers.
ReplyDeleteGeez, Alan! Bizarre isn't even the word for that case you listed. Again, though, it's the stupidity factor. "I can't see any other possible options, except to murder this person." Because, as we all know, murder is so easily done and hidden.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, go to the teenaged fangirl to get that hired killer because we're really, really smart!
A lawyer friend once explained to me that angry crimes are more often committed by those with few options to escape what bothers one. An insurance client of mine, a very sweet young mother, was arrested for killing a neighbor. My friend pointed out to me that is a neighbor bothered me, I could get legal recourse, go on vacation, move . . . but someone of very limited means, like that young mother, might lack those options and would just hang on . . . until one day she might snap. I think the same reasoning is behind the Crisis Nursery, some place safe for the children when Mom can't take any more . . .
ReplyDeleteThat said, in fiction, we want a more satisfying puzzle to solve.
Or, Mary, with less ability to see other options. Youth, particularly, can limit the number of options you're able to see. As we get older, we often become aware of options that we just couldn't see when we were younger and less experienced.
ReplyDelete