Good writing depends on good details.
I know that, and as I’m writing, I try to stay cognizant of
details, but it’s a struggle.
When I’m starting a story, I find I often run roughshod over
important details, and my work lacks the substance that supports a viable tale.
My writing style tends to be terse. I have always written
for my own gratification. While that remains my primary goal, I find a great
deal of satisfaction sharing my stories with other people. In order to do that,
I need to find a way to convey my ideas to the reader.
I joined a critique group and listened carefully to the
participants’ comments. I soon realized that the images that seemed so obvious
to me were not nearly so clear to others.
“How old is the protagonist?” “Is this contemporary?” “Is
the setting rural or big city?”
But I had a very clear picture in my mind of the protagonist
which showed she was in her teens. Shouldn’t it be assumed to be contemporary
if no other time frame is introduced? And why didn’t they see the narrow trail
rising over the rocky outcropping on the way to the remote old mine? I
certainly did.
They don’t, of course, because I haven’t included enough
details to convey my image.
I find lengthy descriptions can be tedious to read and even
more tedious to write, so I tend to avoid them and try to incorporate telling
information in the story.
Margery, my teenage protagonist, can slip out of the high
school cafeteria on her way to the adventure. She can drive her missing
brother’s pickup to a trailhead and pull on her clothing and boots for a hike.
While there, she can check her cell phone for coverage, which anchors the tale
in the present or not-too-distant past. And she can raise a cloud of dust when she
falls as she catches the untied lace of her hiking boots on the edge of a
jagged boulder.
That’s not the story itself, but it provides support and
context. I go through the first drafts of my stories, adding what I hope will
be relevant details to bring it to life.
Equally important is exercising discrimination on what
details to use. They need to be relevant, provide information, and move the
story along. Otherwise, we have Margery not finishing her tuna fish sandwich;
stuffing the plastic sandwich wrapping and a soiled napkin into the crumpled
brown lunch bag; ignoring friend’s greetings on her way to toss it into the open
overflowing trash bin as she leaves the cafeteria via the wide swinging doors to the long dark hallway with the restrooms
smelling of disinfectant; checking the deserted hallway to make sure she is not
observed; remembering the security camera but deciding that by the time anyone
views the video, she will have long succeeded or failed at her task; slipping
out the heavy side exit door with the panic bar and hoping it does not set off
an alarm; dredging the key on the teddy bear keychain to the truck from the pocket
of her worn jeans; proceeding across the student parking lot which reflects the
brutal sun and smells of hot tar and melting asphalt…
Some of these details might be important, but so much is
tedious over-description.
How do you find a balance for details in your writing?
I don’t include tons of detail, and I don’t enjoy reading pages of it some authors think are appropriate. I try to include just enough to anchor the reader’s imagination and leave the rest for them to fill in.
ReplyDeleteI was discussing this very topic this weekend at a writers conference. I like to say we aren't writing travel guides. We're writing novels. Description is like spices in cooking. Too much will ruin the dish. The trick is to find just the right amount to add flavor without overdoing it.
ReplyDeleteSince I mainly write short stories, the details must be relevant to the plot. If the detail doesn't add to the plot, it is more than superfluous, it can confuse the reader, which detracts from the story. Details must give the reader insight. If they don't, get rid of them.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, details are also great places to hide clues.
ReplyDeleteKathleen,
ReplyDeleteYou raise a very important question: how much detail is necessary to set a scene, describe a character or an action without bogging down the pacing. I believe this is one of the many quandaries each writer has to work out.
Jim, I have read much of your work, and I think you have a great balance between necessary detail and letting the readers "see with their own eyes."
ReplyDeleteAnnette, very good analogy. The addition of appropriate details goes a long way to spice things up.
E.B, short stories cannot afford to digress. Details have to be woven into the story.
Thank you, Suntrustblog. I will see if I can check that out.
Yes, Susan, the best red herrings fit seamlessly into the story, often in the form of relevant details.
Kathleen, you nailed it. I've read books that open with five pages of narrative lifted from a guidebook instead of how the main character reacts to her surroundings. I write good food preparation and diner meal scenes, but slash the details to focus on the dialogue.
ReplyDeleteGreat points, Kathleen. The devil is in the details and too much is well, too much (and sometimes I suspect a way to raise the word count. I'm a visual person. I try to see what my character sees and convey only the necessary details to bring the reader into the picture.
ReplyDeleteMargaret, I've read some of your food scenes, and you give us just enough detail, esp. via dialogue, to follow well.
ReplyDeleteKait, seeing through your character's eyes presents a great way to handle details.