Choosing
late in life to become a writer, as I did, comes with baggage. Not a roller
case, but an integrated backpack system you can’t remove. It goes by the name
of the career you left behind, and
mine was thirty years long, including twelve years leading the marketing
department at one of America’s largest multinational corporations.
At
least for me, it was never going to be as easy as ending one career and
starting another. When I first sat down to write, the backpack straps dug into
my shoulders and the weight clamored to be part of my fledgling new writing
life. I had no idea how to connect the two, I just knew that I needed to.
I
started, as all wiseacres do, with jokes. Marketing, I liked to say, was superb
preparation for writing crime stories. But the cutting weight on my shoulders told
me that insulting my first career wasn’t a solution.
Fortunately,
when I began to write, I made the conscious decision to focus on short stories,
using the logic that I would start small and work up. A rookie mistake, perhaps,
but it had a benefit. Short stories require compression and clear thinking,
which reminded me of the five years I spent writing advertising and direct mail
copy. Copywriting champions brevity, ideation, rewriting, and the ability to hold
a reader’s interest, techniques useful to short stories. Thankfully, as I
unpacked those skills, I also settled back into my writer’s thick skin. After
all, those five years taught me that my best draft was always, always my
editor’s starting point.
Then,
at a writing conference, I heard a panelist exhort the attendees to write what you know. But she giggled
after making the statement, and I suspected she hadn’t spoken a truth about
writing, she’d spouted folklore.
Folklore
is something marketers understand. All marketing projects begin with research,
and the holy grail of market research is to identify folklore, to expose the
difference between what people say and believe, versus the truth about
companies, products and marketplaces. And book plots, I realized, were like
marketplaces. They had their own logic, cause and effect, and ultimate truths. The
red herrings and misdirection in mysteries were the folklore to be debunked.
Light
on my feet, now, I began my first novel, and when I did my marketing skills jogged
with me. They kept me company, egged me on, and became the teammates I couldn’t
disappoint.
Then,
during a panel discussion at my first mystery conference, I heard an author
tell us not to write what we know, but to write
what you don’t know. A clever twist, I thought, until I realized there were
only two ways to meet that challenge: research, and most of all, imagination.
Suddenly
another part of my first career opened up to me. Over three decades, I saw
people trapped in the maw of incompetent bosses, office romances blossom and
die, the wreckage caused by poorly conceived projects, staggering self
promotion and the withering of promising ideas. People had lied to my face,
lied about me behind my back and schemed for my job. Others told me the truth
when I needed it most, or stuck with me when things seemed impossible. People
had trusted me, and I had learned to trust them back. I saw all of these things,
and I knew them as absolute truths. I believed in them. And with a little
imagination, I realized, those things could live in my novels.
The
backpack slipped from my shoulders. I could write what I knew, and thanks to
imaginative twists, place it all in a new context. My characters now felt real
to me, which made me believe they would feel real to the reader. And just like
that, the weight of my first career transformed into the airy kiss of a
blessing.
Although
I still plan to make jokes about it, here and there.
Peter
W. J. Hayes is a recovered marketing executive and mystery writer. The first
novel of his Pittsburgh Trilogy, The
Things That Aren’t There, launched in July, 2018. His short stories have
appeared in various anthologies and publications, including the 2017 and 2018
Malice Domestic anthologies, Black Cat
Mystery Magazine, Mystery Weekly,
Mysterical-E, and The Literary Hatchet. He
has won or been shortlisted for various awards, including the Crime Writers’
Association Debut Dagger Award. You can find him at www.peterwjhayes.com.
Welcome to Writers Who Kill, Peter! And I love the book.
ReplyDeleteMy own version of the "write what you know" theory is "write what you WANT to know" which leads to a lot of fun research. But the way you merge your past marketing skills into your writing has been eye-opening to me.
Full disclosure: Peter was one of my Critique Boot Campers in July, so we've discussed this in a bit more detail than what's here. He could teach a workshop on hooks, capturing the reader's attention, and using each word to keep it. Marketing 101 and writing 101.
I'm with Annette. I write what I want to know more about. Congratulations on your latest release.
ReplyDeleteMy particular variation on the theme is: "Don't write what you don't know." If you want to write about 11th century pottery makers, first research 11th century pottery makers and THEN write about them.
ReplyDeleteIt's great that you can use that wealth of work experience--good and not so good-- in your writing.
ReplyDeleteWelcome to Writers Who Kill, Peter. I didn't start writing books until I was in my mid to late 60s. I'm now on the tenth book in my mystery series. I both write what I know and what I research to fit in. I also write short stories and poetry. I'm putting your book on my TBO list.
ReplyDeleteYour past experiences, including other careers, aren't going to leave because you've decided you want to be a writer. Since those experiences have gone into making you who you are, use them! They make for a richer and more nuanced read for your audience.
ReplyDelete