Just as I’m certain every little kid in the theater did at one point, I lifted my glasses to get a glimpse of the movie sans plastic adjusters. Without vision correction, the ducks morphed into blurry blobs, recognizable only because of context. Only when I replaced the glasses did I regain the sharp definition and clarity of colors.
The experience got me thinking about the books I read—as well as the ones I write—and the importance of creating a three-dimensional experience. Obviously, authors can’t employ fancy physical gadgets such as 3D glasses, but we have other tools at our disposal. We can crackle dead leaves beneath soft suede moccasins. We can send the scent of pine drifting on an icy breeze. Appealing to the senses draws readers into our fictional settings.
But equally important—for me, even more important—is the way authors construct their characters. How does a writer make characters come alive? Make them leap from the pages to become three-dimensional humans that readers feel they know and like — or fear — or sympathize with — or all of the above?
As a reader and moviegoer, what I want most from a story is depth of character, and not just regarding the protagonist or supporting cast. The stories I find most satisfying are the ones with layered, human villains.
Two-dimensional, cardboard bad guys and gals may still cause me to jump in my seat or chew my nails, but they rarely leave a lasting impression. It’s the tragic villains that live on in my imagination—the characters with a backstory, a vivid and psychologically understandable motivation.
Then there are the offenders who aren’t even truly villainous in their hearts. They perpetrate their misdeeds as a result of their own loss, grief, or prior mistreatment. Think Phantom of the Opera, Norman Bates, Severus Snape.
Sociologists also posit that some people are “born bad” — that psychopathy and sociopathy are hard-wired into their brains from birth. This served as the premise of the TV series Dexter — genetic sociopathy later channeled by someone else’s moral compass. What a concept.
Of course, none of these “reasons” for the perpetration of atrocious acts excuse the villains’ behavior. After all, most people possess free will, along with a capacity for insight and the ability to change. The point is, the richer the antihero’s backstory, the more believable that person becomes, and the more engrossed we become in the story. When readers and moviegoers grasp motives such as vengeance, grief, and ambition, we might even discover a smidgen of empathy, along with a bit of self-reflection and sometimes even discomfort. In similar circumstances, could I succumb to those baser instincts?
“There is some good in the worst of us and some evil in the best of us.” — Martin Luther King, Jr.
Which bad guys/gals have left a lasting impression on you?
***
Lori Roberts Herbst writes the Callie Cassidy Mysteries, a cozy mystery series set in Rock Creek Village, Colorado. To find out more and to sign up for her newsletter, go to www.lorirobertsherbst.com
Sometimes it is the cartoon characters who stick in your mind: the Russian spies Boris Badenov and the villian Snidley Whiplash all from the Rocky and Bullwinkle show still are with me 50+ years later.
ReplyDeleteJim, same here, but let's face it, they were hysterical! I think if a serious bad guy was that two-dimensional, they wouldn't be nearly as memorable.
DeleteVery good point, Jim—and you, too, Annette!
DeleteI'm teaching an online course this afternoon on this very subject!
ReplyDeleteVillains with some small redeeming value or an understandable motive are fascinating to read and to write IMO. I have one villain in one of my books that I really came to love and hated to have to do away with him. He'd done some despicable acts during the book, so I had to, but his history and his attempt to redeem himself made me wish I could find a way out of it for him.
Sounds like a great course, Annette! One of the best plots I've written (in my opinion) is the "bad guy" who also did lots of "good acts." It's fun to explore the gray areas.
DeleteI create villains who are taking advantage of and exploiting their victims. They know what they're doing, but in their world view, they're "helping" others because they care about them.
ReplyDeleteMore excellent gray area, Margaret. I've been thinking a lot lately about how interesting perception is—whose perception is "right"?
DeleteTo tell the truth, it's real "bad guys," not fictional ones, who stick in my mind. I worked in a prison for years, and supervised an inmate work crew. They were all convicted "bad guys" (and contrary to conventional wisdom, none of them ever tried to convince me that they didn't commit the crimes) but they were definitely multi-dimensional people, and definitely had their good sides.
ReplyDeleteWhat a fascinating job! I'll bet you have a lot to draw on in your writing. The psychological aspects fascinate me.
DeleteYour comparison to the 3-D glasses was excellent - but for me, sometimes the blur is what makes the bad guy work. That's because not every 'bad guy' can be totally bad nor totally good and the twists of when that happens is what makes me follow them when I read a book. Of course, for the humor, Boris was memorable.
ReplyDeleteSo true, Debra. I think authors who clarify that "blur" by accentuating it for readers keep us deeply interested in the characters, rather than just cheering for their demise.
DeleteInteresting questions. I have always been fascinated by the tipping point. That one place in human psyche that changes someone from a law-abiding citizen to a renegade. I believe it is different for each of us, but each of us have it.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Kait. I hear people on the news sometimes who sound so righteous, and I think, they're scared of what might lurk within them...
Delete