Some people have no trouble believing in almost everything they read, see or hear. These are the gullible ones. Like my mother-in-law and her husband did. They bought the supermarket rags in the checkout line and believed everything they read no matter how outlandish or how fake the pictures were. What about the reality shows that used to be so popular and maybe still are? Are there people who believe it’s all true life and not scripted? Since I never watched them, I’m not even sure if there still are reality shows.
What about all the hoopla about some football players taking the knee during The Pledge of Allegiance or the National Anthem? That went on for months and months. And what about the lies some politicians tell (not mentioning any names) and people seem to believe.
When does it become okay for a writer to fudge the truth? We expect news reporters to write the truth – not that they always do. Columnists, on the other hand, have a political or personal agenda they want to get across. I imagine most of us believe or disbelieve the columnist according to our personal beliefs.
|A few years ago a lot of writers were writing about big Foot.|
Writers of non-fiction are expected to be truthful. Years ago James Frey got pilloried when it was discovered some of his memoir was not the whole truth. Greg Mortenson, who wrote Three Cups of Tea, followed by Stones into Schools, became a best-selling author that I enjoyed. His books were selling quite well. He traveled the country talking about his mission to build schools, especially for girls in Pakistan and Afghanistan. It was a worthwhile endeavor until it crashed after it was discovered all he claimed to have done in the first book wasn’t totally true.
So as fiction writers, how much can we shade reality and have our readers suspend belief or at least not bothered by it. Obviously, those writing paranormal or science fiction don’t have to worry much. But even traditional mysteries often ask the reader to suspend their beliefs. Take the many versions of Sherlock Holmes. Can one detective really be that brilliant? But those of us who love him are willing to suspend belief, or in an elderly sleuth like Miss Marple, who solves many crimes by her astute observations.
We who write series count on readers to suspend belief, especially in cozies. Okay, how many times can an amateur sleuth, who walks dogs, caters meals, runs a book store or is a gardener find a body and solve a crime? How many small towns like Cabot’s Cove in the Murder She Wrote series can have dead bodies showing up before no one wants to live there anymore?
|I had my son pose as a dead body for this.|
Because my series is on a gardening timeline; the first in June, the second in July, the third in August, the fourth in September, the fifth in October, I have to skip the gardening while still including a flower in the title. I’ve written one for November, December, January, February and am now working on my tenth book, my March book Daffodils in March. Of course, I’m almost like the Cabot Cove mysteries. As for DNA testing, my police chief has a good friend he went to college with in some position in the Ohio BCI, who rushes things through for him. And my main character, Catherine Jewell isn’t always discovering bodies in every book anymore. It’s enough that she and the Police Chief are engaged now and she sometimes comes up with a clue or two.
As a mystery reader I’m willing to suspend belief – at least to a certain extent if the writer makes it seem plausible. I think in most of us there is a wanting to believe extending back to Santa Claus, and we want to believe the good guys will win, and the bad guys will get their justice where in most books they do. That could be one reason that mysteries are so popular.
|How many of you believed in Santa Claus?|
Are you able to suspend belief when reading mysteries?
If you’re a writer, how, where and why do you sometimes fudge the facts?