If you are interested in blogging or want to promote your book, please contact E. B. Davis at writerswhokill@gmail.com.

Here are our August WWK interviews:

August 1 Rhys Bowen, Four Funerals and Maybe A Wedding

August 8 Liz Milliron, Root Of All Evil

August 15 Kellye Garrett, Hollywood Ending

August 22 Joyce Tremel, A Brewing Trouble Mystery Series

August 29 Dianne Freeman, A Ladies Guide to Etiquette and Murder

Our August Saturday Guest Blogger Schedule: 8/4--Kelly Oliver, 8/11--Lisa Ciarfella, 8/18--Margaret S. Hamilton, 8/25--Kait Carson.

Congratulations to our writers for the following publications:

Annette Dashofy's Uneasy Prey was released in March. It is the sixth Zoe Chambers Mystery. The seventh, Cry Wolf, will be released on September 18th. Look for E. B. Davis's interview with Annette on September 19th.

Carla Damron's quirky short story, "Subplot", was published in the Spring edition of The Offbeat Literary Journal. You can find it here: http://offbeat.msu.edu/volume-18-spring-2018/

Tina Whittle's sixth Tai Randolph mystery, Necessary Ends, debuts on April 3, 2018. Look for it here. Tina was nominated for a Derringer Award for her novelette, "Trouble Like A Freight Train Coming." We're all crossing our fingers for her.

James M. Jackson's Empty Promises, the next in the Seamus McCree mystery series (5th), was published on April 3, 2018. Purchase links are here. He's working on Seamus McCree #6 (False Bottom)

Dark Sister, a poetry collection, is Linda Rodriguez's tenth published book. It's available for sale here:

Shari Randall's "Pets" will be included in Chesapeake Crimes: Fur, Feathers, and Felonies anthology, which will be published in 2018. In the same anthology "Rasputin," KM Rockwood's short story, will also be published. Her short story "Goldie" will be published in the Busted anthology, which will be released by Level Best Books on April 25th.

Shari Randall's second Lobster Shack Mystery, Against the Claw, will be available in July 31, 2018.


Friday, May 18, 2018

Are they crazy or just stupid? : A plea for understanding by Warren Bull

Are they crazy or just stupid? :  A plea for understanding by Warren Bull

Image from Pixabay

On June 16, 1858, at the Illinois Republican convention in Springfield, Illinois, Abraham Lincoln kicked off his bid for the U.S. Senate with a speech that included the Biblical phrase, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

Lincoln was talking about slavery then. Today our house, America, is more divided, about many issues, than it has been since that speech was given. We have retreated into separate groups where we ask people who share our beliefs and values questions like the one that started this article. 

Throughout history people have always interacted with others they feel comfortable with. We’ve always formed political, ethnic and family tribes.  Tribes stick together and get irritated with other tribes that don’t share their vision of how things are and should be. That’s not the problem. Healthy airing of differences and complaints leads to better cooperation and understanding. 

It’s much more of a problem that we don’t air our differences in a way that makes cooperation possible. Within our tribe we find justification for our particular view of the world, which is less than totally accurate. And darn it, the same thing is going in the other tribe where they have a different view that falls as short from perfection as ours does. We used to bump into members of other tribes daily so we had to manage to get along even though we thought their myopic vision was obviously inferior to our myopia. No group has a monopoly on the absolute truth.
Now, with the Internet and splintered parochial sources of news, physical space is less important. Online and through media we don’t have to leave our cozy, safe and unchallenged niche at all. In Congress and on television when our “leaders” confront their “politicians” they shout out our perceptions as if they were absolute flawless, spend time between rants planning what want to say next rather than listening to the “other” and perform strictly for “us.” The more insulated we become, the less we know about what we do notknow. The less we know about “others” the easier it is to assume they are dangerous people plotting to impose their beliefs on us.

We are like people walking through an unfamiliar neighborhood during a dark and deafening thunderstorm, we need less noise and more light. Our beliefs are just as emotional and irrational as theirs. Regardless of tribe, most of us are in favor of greater gay rights, healing the sick and seeking justice. We are mutually concerned about diminishing privacy due to greater government surveillance. We all want a stronger America. However, looking at questions in the “we” versus “them” way makes finding an answer nearly impossible. For example, does immigration make coexisting more complicated and less orderlyor doesit add to the diversity of experiences and strategies we can use as a nation to solve problems? The real answer is “both.” If we would acknowledge “their” valid points, we could work out a solution together. 


Margaret Turkevich said...

well stated, Warren. I push myself to read news sources outside my comfort zone.

Gloria Alden said...

Warren an excellent blog. Fortunately, I grew up in a family who makes it easy to get along with because we all have the same beliefs, and that is liberal belieda believing that Gays have their rights, and immigrants are what built our country, others who are of different religions are just as nice and honest as those who believe as we do.

KM Rockwood said...

Of course I'm right, but it wouldn't hurt to listen to other points of view. Civily. Of course they think they are right. Who knows, perhaps the truth lies somewhere in between