by Linda Rodriguez
Pearl
Buck is one of those once-great and now-forgotten authors who’s
getting a new lease on life through the influence of Oprah Winfrey.
In late 2004, Winfrey selected Buck’s The
Good Earth for
Oprah’s Book Club. Simon & Schuster's Washington Square Press
printed 750,000 copies of a new trade paperback version of the book.
Most of Buck’s novels had fallen out of favor with critics and
fallen out of print. The discussion that ensued around this Oprah’s
Book Club Selection brought several of Buck’s finest books back
into print once more.
I
know it’s fashionable in literary circles to criticize Oprah, but I
believe she provides America, in general, and literary culture, in
particular, a real service in encouraging reading and in bringing
recognition to forgotten or overlooked works. Look at what happened
to Buck. Even though Buck was the first American woman to receive the
Nobel Prize for Literature, her bestselling and award-winning books,
such as The
Good Earth,
Sons,
A
House Divided,
Other
Gods,
China
Sky,
Dragon
Seed,
Pavilion
of Women,
Peony,
The
Big Wave,
and Imperial
Woman,
had mostly been out of print. The gatekeepers of American literature,
professors and critics, had pretty much consigned her books to the
ash heap as “not literary enough” and “too popular” until
Oprah pointed a spotlight back on her Pulitzer Prize-winning
masterpiece, The
Good Earth.
This
is a recurring problem with modern American literary criticism, which
is primarily based in academia. When writers originally considered
literary and praised for their work become too popular or—heaven
forbid!—make too much money from their books, they are soon scorned
and relegated to the cultural ash heap of “not literary enough”
and “too popular.” If they start out popular and sell well, those
works may never even be considered literary—because how can they be
if they’re so popular, right? In large part, this derives from a
literary culture which has moved mostly to the university and where
established writers and critics have their bills paid by other means
than their writing. Another whole blog post right there! And in that
category of another blog post to come, why is that male novelists can
write one or two strong books and be forgiven for weak, meandering
work after that for the sake of those powerful books, but too often
women writers can write a number of strong books, yet if they should
have even one weaker, less well-crafted book, all their work must
then be dismissed?
Buck
was a remarkable writer and remarkable person, who as a missionary’s
child in China found in her backyard the mutilated remains of infant
daughters abandoned to die and made them graves, as a teen
volunteered to teach ex-brothel workers and sex slaves, as an adult
novelist was accused in the U.S. of being a Communist while Maoist
China accused her of being an imperialist. She thought, even as an
adult in America, in Chinese first. English was always her second
language. Even in her writing, she thought in Chinese and translated
onto the page into simple, lucid, and powerful English. She worked
tirelessly to improve the lot of minorities, women, and children,
especially those with disabilities, in America and China. And wrote
many books and shorter pieces, some weak and some extremely powerful.
At the end of her long life, a frail elder in thrall to a con man,
she degenerated in a sad way from the person she had been for most of
her life.
Buck
always had the reader in mind when she wrote rather than the critics,
so it may be a given that the critics would turn their backs on her.
I love what Buck said in her Nobel acceptance speech. She pointed out
that, in China, "the novelist did not have the task of creating
art but of speaking to the people." “Like the Chinese
novelist,” she said, "I have been taught to want to write for
these people. If they are reading their magazines by the million,
then I want my stories there rather than in magazines read only by a
few.” Perhaps this is why her stories of people’s lives,
especially women’s, are so enthralling. I know they have helped me
through times of great physical and emotional pain.
Do
you have authors whom you have loved and who have meant a lot to you
who have fallen into disrepute or completely disappeared?
Linda Rodriguez's Plotting the
Character-Driven Novel, based on her popular workshop, and The
World Is One Place: Native American Poets Visit the Middle East,
an anthology she co-edited, are her newest books. Every Family
Doubt, her fourth mystery novel featuring Cherokee campus police
chief, Skeet Bannion, will appear January 17, 2018. Her three earlier
Skeet novels—Every Hidden Fear, Every Broken Trust,
and Every Last Secret—and
her books of poetry—Skin Hunger
and Heart's Migration—have
received critical recognition and awards, such as St. Martin's
Press/Malice Domestic Best First Novel, International
Latino Book Award, Latina Book Club Best Book of 2014, Midwest Voices
& Visions, Elvira Cordero Cisneros Award, Thorpe Menn Award, and
Ragdale and Macondo fellowships. Her short story, “The Good
Neighbor,” published in the anthology, Kansas City Noir, has
been optioned for film.
Rodriguez is past chair of the AWP
Indigenous Writer’s Caucus, past president of Border Crimes chapter
of Sisters in Crime, founding board member of Latino Writers
Collective and The Writers Place, and a member of International
Thriller Writers, Wordcraft Circle of Native American Writers and
Storytellers, and Kansas City Cherokee Community. Visit her at
http://lindarodriguezwrites.blogspot.com
I think The Good Earth must have been the first Pearl Buck book that I read. I fell in love with China and her writing. Of course in those days China was closed and very mysterious, and the China Buck wrote about was long gone.
ReplyDeleteShe was a groundbreaking writer. I had no idea that her first language remained Chinese. it explains the lovely music in her prose. It is a shame that her novels have fallen from popularity.
When I retired, I thought it would be interesting to read the Pulitzer-winning novels starting with the oldest and working my way forward. Many of the earliest ones I could not find in the library (The Hamilton County library system in Ohio, which has a huge collection) or purchasing new online. The only place I could find them was through used books.
ReplyDeleteThat process of trying to find award-winners of less than a century ago was an excellent reminder that I should write for my audience today, because the chances of anyone reading me long in the future are zero (with a small rounding error).
~ Jim
I remember Pearl Buck as a glamorous, iconic figure lifted from the pages of Life magazine, the Good Earth probably a book of the month club selection. I read the Good Earth in junior high and enjoyed it very much.
ReplyDeletePearl Buck wrote enthralling stories and did much to raise awareness about the plight of the people in China, especially that of women. I'm sure that she would have been quite pleased that Oprah selected one of her books for her program.
ReplyDeleteI was lucky enough to have parents who loved to read. They belonged to the Book of The Month Club and bought and read her books as well as many others. When they died my siblings only
ReplyDeletetook a few of their vast collection, and I took all the rest including some really old ones from my grandparents. I have two by A. Conan Doyle that are not about Sherlock Holmes, Vanity Fair by William Makepiece Thackery, and so many other really old books that I think my father
may have been collecting, too. I read The Good Earth and remember liking it. I still have 5 of her books and I think I'll start reading them again, especially Death in the Castle.
Authors rise and fall as they are forgotten and re-discovered.
ReplyDeleteI was young when I read The Good Earth and it made a huge impression on me. Some of her other writings are terribly dated, but that's to be expected.
ReplyDeleteThe Pearl S. Buck house is only a couple of hours from where I live. There are writing classes there as well as tours. I keep putting off a field trip. I think you've motivated me to arrange it. Thanks, Linda. Great post and a most worthy subject.
Kait, she'd long been a favorite of mine. Years ago, when I lost a lot of books in a flood and tried to replace them, I found that hers, along with several other fine women writers like Edna Ferber, were all out of print, so I had to seek them out at used bookstores and library book sales. I was so pleased to see that Oprah's selection of her caused publishers to bring her books back into print.
ReplyDeleteJim, you're right. I did a post one year--I think as a guest blog--showing the Publishers Weekly top book for every year of the 20th century, and very few of them are still in print or even have been heard of by modern readers. A sobering experience. I might see if I can find that and post it here in a few weeks.
ReplyDeleteMargaret, she was an articulate, glamorous figure and an activist for many good causes, highly respected. Then, as a fragile, vulnerable, quite elderly wealthy woman, she fell under the influence of a predatory con man, and her reputation suffered for things he did in her name.
ReplyDeleteGrace, I think you might be right, but I know she would have been thrilled to see all the bright young Chinese women studying for graduate degrees in the US with intentions of going back to China to be doctors, scientists, economists, and politicians.
ReplyDeleteGloria, I think you'll like her books. One of the reasons I think you will is also one of the main reasons she was pushed aside, in spite of being a Nobel Prizewinner (as well, of course, as being female, which played a big part). She publicly said in her Nobel speech that she was writing popular books for the people and not for the academy and critics, almost always a kiss of death in the US literary scene. She believed very strongly that she should be telling a story that would interest and entertain her readers. She did it with a great deal of artistry most of the time, but she never forgot that aim.
ReplyDeleteWarren, may we be rediscovered in time--and may we rise now, first of all.
ReplyDeleteOh, yes, Roberta! Do go to the Buck house and then tell us all about it. I wish I could go with you.
ReplyDeleteThought-provoking post, Linda. When I worked in the library, a never ending task was "weeding," pulling books with low circulation or bad condition from the shelves to make room for new items. We saw authors fade from popularity - big names, best sellers like James Michener and Tom Clancy were on the chopping block all the time. I'm glad Oprah gave Pearl Buck a reprieve. It's sad how many books - and entire subject areas - were under review because people simply weren't checking them out. When our school systems cut art classes, staff had to fight to keep gorgeous, expensive art books on our shelves since they fell under the "weed because of low circulation" rule.
ReplyDeleteI never realized Pearl Buck was anything but a famous well-regarded author.
ReplyDeleteThe quirks of the tax laws make books go out of print very quickly now, and make it unfeasible for publishers/brokers/bookshops to hang onto wonderful books that are somewhat slow sellers. When book inventory was not so highly taxed, they cold be kept in stock. One of the advantages of print-on-demand and ebooks is that they manage to overcome this inventory tax.
After I lost many loved books due to flooding years ago, I thought I'd just check them out from the library since many were "classics." To my shock, I found the library had discarded even those "classics." That's when I started the trudge through used bookstores and library book sales to replace them. Sadly, I'm now having to decide which of those books can't come with us since our space is drastically reduced from what we had. Fortunately, a poor town in the Cherokee Nation needs a library and has no books, so singlehandedly I'm going to be able to furnish a library for them.
ReplyDeleteAnd that last comment was for you, Shari. LOL
ReplyDeleteKM, you're absolutely right about the destructive tax laws that so horribly impact authors, publishers, bookstores, and books.
ReplyDelete