A helpful way to read detective fiction is to be aware of "the rules of the game," as mystery writers call it. The characteristics of detective fiction that began with Edgar Allan Poe developed into a fairly rigid "code" for other writers to follow, and there are several famous such ‘codes’ compiled by different writers and theorists over the decades. Father Knox’s Ten Commandments of Detective Fiction is one; 20 Rules by SS Van Dine is another; Dorothy Sayers and the Detection Club had another list. Here is a compilation:
1. In its basic structure, the detective story must never vary from being absolutely logical.
2. A completely unpardonable sin is the substitution of accident, chance, or coincidence for logical deduction (no supernatural intervention, either).
3. The detective story must always play fair: no evidence can be made known to the reader, which remains unknown to the detective, and vice-versa.
4. All action must proceed from the central theme of the crime and the pursuit of the criminal.
5. No human frailties, like stupidity or a poor memory, can change or prolong the plot in any way.
There are some secondary rules, especially for the traditional puzzle that involves an amateur killer:
1. The crime must be murder.
2. The killer's motive must be strong enough to induce an amateur to commit murder
3. All suspects must be real suspects, the killer must be one of the suspects (don't bring in a new character at the end)
4. The murder must be pre-meditated, or if it is a crime of passion, or unintended, it must be ingeniously covered up.
5. The killer should be an intelligent, competent amateur, the crime elegantly planned which, except for the brilliant detective, would go unsolved.
6. Clues should be clearly presented. All information given to the detective must be given to the reader. This is called "Fair Play."
7. The detective is not superhuman but uses reasoning to fit the clues together .
These are not rules, but nice to have:
1. The detective is fun if unusual, fallible, and has personal problems.
2. Lead characters should grow and change
3. The detective should have a profession that allows him/her to spend time, money, and energy on the crime
4. Don't treat police as idiots
5. Don't make the victim an angel or the killer thoroughly evil.
6. The killer must be an amateur who has not killed before and does not plan to kill again - no serial killers, psychos, random killings (unless it's a police procedural or a ‘thriller’ – the traditional ‘puzzle’ mystery dislikes such matters).
7. The story must be moral in that BAD is punished, GOOD rewarded, and the universe is restored to harmony and balance.
8. In the classic whodunnit, the killer should be near the victim, and use an ordinary means
9. It is desirable for the murder to occur early in the story so the puzzle is whodunnit, not when-will-the-writer-get-down-to-business.
10. It helps if there is a deadline to beat; a "ticking clock."
Clearly, there are exceptions. Obviously, there are different expectations across sub-genres such as the police procedural, the caper or the PI story. And we know full well that real crime isn’t so tidy as all this; there is random violence, gang shootings and crimes of mayhem that are so horrible they can’t really be treated lightly in ‘the mystery’ as an entertainment. So I realize these ‘rules’ are limited. But they assisted me in writing my first two mysteries and I hope you’ll appreciate reading mysteries more having seen ‘the rules’, such as they are.
The reader only has 2 rules:
1. Don't read the end.
2. Don't tell Whodunnit.
John Desjarlais
Look for John’s newest book, Viper, released by Sophia Institute Press in July, at Ingram or Amazon. John’s website is: http://www.johndesjarlais.com/.
What a fascinating blog, and an educational piece! Thanks, E.B. for bringing Mr. Desjarlais to us. I will refer to these rules often!
ReplyDeleteMr. Desjarlais: I'm curious about one rule. The crime must always be murder. Joelle Charbonneau's Skating Over the Line involves car thefts. A body doesn't actually shoe up until page 204. So she kind of skates over these rules . Her comment was that if every small town had as many murders as say Jessica Fletcher's Cabot Cove, the population would be down to zero. What are your thoughts on this?
Second. Edgar Allen Poe. What a name to live up to. What a master.
Thanks for your wonderful post.
Good points Donnell. I'm going to compare his rules with the stories that I read in Ellery Queen, which features detective fiction. My main characters aren't detectives. I have detectives in my manuscripts, but they aren't my main interest. Thanks for the blog, John.
ReplyDeleteDonnell: Well, the crime can be anything - counterfeiting, kidnapping, extortion, robbery, and on - but most readers of the genre expect a body or two, and murder is the crime with the highest stakes - the theft of a human life and the ultimate assault on human dignity and personhood. -- Most writers fudge a little with the 'rules' and even the great Agatha Christie broke them gleefully (even if she had a part in defining the 'rules' for the British Detection Club). But that's part of the 'game' of detective fiction - to play fair with the rules - usually - to outwit the clever reader. -- Yes, I've heard that about Cabot Cove. At some point, the small-town-amateur-sleuth premise begins to stretch credulity because of the body count and the coincidence of the amateur needing to get involved. This is why PI or police procedural stories have an edge in the genre, since the protagonists have crime and trouble as partof their professions.
ReplyDeletejjd
I've read parts of the rules in various places. Thank you for putting them all together. I'm going to use your post as a reference.
ReplyDeleteThank you for assembling so many rules together. I wasn't aware of them all. I've used relatives or friends of the victim or suspect because the relative or friend has a high stake in finding the killer or keeping a loved one out of jail. Then the rules about not treating the police as idiots and making the killer smart and sneaky apply.
ReplyDeleteThe practice of presenting police as near-fools begins with Poe and the tradition of 'the brilliant detective'. Auguste Dupin appears to be all the more brilliant when his foil is a police officer who is lower-class and not as fast intellectually. Dupin's sidekick, too, the unnamed American journalist, is also slower. This is repeated with Sherlock Holmes, whose sidekick is slower and who confounds Lestrade, the police Inspectr. Hercule Poirot continues the tradition with the hapless Captain Hastings and Inspector Japp. However, when we reach the late 40s and 1950s, police forensics and lab work take a huge leap forward and the brilliant independent investigator who outwits the police becomes an anachronism.
ReplyDelete