My novel takes place on Bodie and
Hatteras Islands, but it includes references to Ocracoke and Pea Islands. Pea
Island? I haven’t mentioned that one as part of the Outer Banks, and therein
lies part of my problem. Pea Island is only a part-time island located on the
northern tip of Hatteras Island. Due to the transient nature of the Outer
Banks, storms cut through the land creating islands, but then, the ocean fills in
the storm cuts eliminating island demarcations.
In the map I’ve provided, there
is no mention of Pea Island even though everyone calls the northern tip of Hatteras
Island—Pea Island. It is Wildlife Refuge also protected by the National Park
Service. In September of 2011 after Hurricane Irene created cuts, engineers
were constructing a new bridge from the renewed Pea Island to Hatteras Island.
They found an old bridge buried underneath the new cut. Historically it has
been an island, although just a year ago it wasn’t.
Because of this unique geography,
I’ve found my fiction stumbles when trying to describe it to readers in a way
that doesn’t take them out of the story. In mystery novels I’ve read,
especially English mysteries, writers often provide map prefaces showing the
geographic setting, a region or a town map that includes structures important
in the novel. I’ve wondered if I should include such a preface to my novel.
I have mixed feelings about map
prefaces. I’ve found them extremely helpful in the past, after all a picture is
worth a thousand words, and yet I feel a bit irritated by them too, because
what I want to do when I pick up a novel is read, not study a map. In a way,
it’s an authorial cheat. But then, graphic novels seem in vogue even if I’m not
considering the full graphics of this stylized fiction. I also become irritated
by maps because I’m being given a glimpse into the story before the story
begins.
In my imagination, I envision my
preface to have one map, a tiny explanation and references to other sources of
information on the Outer Banks. Would this offend you? Is it a cheat?
I love maps and never consider them a cheat but rather an extra texture the author provides me to help ground the story.
ReplyDeleteIn quests they often show the path as well as markers for significant stops along the journey. These are fine with me as well as long as they don't give away the story.
If the map is from a real place, then I expect judicious pruning of the extraneous. If the map is of a made-up world, I want only the highlights.
Spare and clarifying should be the mapmaker's guiding principles -- at least in my book.
~ Jim
Thanks for the endorsement, Jim. I hesitate, and yet, my critique partners seem confused at times when my main character travels through the islands. The Outer Banks are a hard place to describe because, due to the nature of islands, they change.
ReplyDeleteBut my other questions are: Do maps cost the publisher more? Would having a map change an editor's mind about publishing my work?
I don't think a map costs anything extra as long as it's black and white.
ReplyDeleteYou'll create it as a jpeg file (or the equivalent) and they will place it in the right spot in the word document (or equivalent).
~ Jim
EB, I think the map will help the book. Anything that helps to keep your reader in your story and not pulling out, shaking his head with confusion.
ReplyDeleteMaps are not uncommon in historical fiction, especially. If black and white, this one shouldn't be a problem for the publisher. Just make sure it's not too detailed. Clear and easy to read are the guidelines.
Good luck!
I like having maps. I put a post-it
ReplyDeletenote or a paperclip there so I can easily refer to the map as I'm reading. I think it adds to a sense of place, which I feel is important to a book. I recently read an Elizabeth George book - FOR THE SAKE OF ELENA - that had a map. Alan Bradley also uses maps in his delightful Flavian de Luce series.
I also like a list of characters and a short blurb about them at the beginning, too, especially if there are a lot of characters, but that's not as common as maps.
Thanks, Linda and Jim--who have experience in the publishing world. With jpg files and electronic layout, I guess a few graphics aren't the bother they once were.
ReplyDeleteGloria--Although George is an American, her series is English and many English mysteries contain both maps and other information in the front. Sometimes, the information seems unnecessary, but like Linda said, if a reader is taken out of the story and a map helps, it seems like a good idea.
I think that I may put in a good map. Now where to find one!
EB, there are several American mysteries and historical novels that also use maps.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I just have to brag. B&N's mystery expert just named EVERY LAST SECRET one the month's must-read books--the only debut. (Imagine me happy-dancing around the house and while you're at it, imagine years younger and without the cane.)
EB,
ReplyDeleteThe map in this blog looks good. Could you do an outline of that? In Death on Demand by Carolyn Hart, a character get stranded waiting for the ferry and reads a sign that gives the geography and history of the island setting of the novel. Clever.
I am shocked! Shocked I tell you. that Linda used your blog to brag about her book. You'd never find me bragging that my novel heartland was selected as the book of the day by Killer Nashville, which it was. Dancing around my mother's kitchen.
Okay you two--BSPing is what this blog is all about--so continue dancing! Congratulations to you both--all deserved and no more whining!
ReplyDeleteWarren, we'll have to dance a jig together. Congratulations! Killer Nashville! That's fabulous! Spread the word far and wide!
ReplyDeleteThanks, EB. It is funny, considering Warren and I both just did whining posts, isn't it?
Perhaps we should all whine more often.
ReplyDelete