“’Influence is the
definition of leverage,’ my father said.”
Art Taylor, “A
Necessary Ingredient,” Kindle Loc. Page 533
The Boy Detective & The Summer of
‘74 and Other Tales of Suspense
features 16 stories that have collectively won an Edgar Award, two Anthony
Awards (one as editor), four Agatha Awards, three Macavity Awards, and three
Derringer Awards. From his first story for Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine in
1995 to his latest for Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine-- the title story,
25 years in the making--this collection charts the development of Art Taylor's
career so far... and turns the page toward more stories still ahead.
I had the pleasure of meeting
Art Taylor through the Sisters in Crime Chesapeake Chapter. I’ve also had the
honor of having my stories appear with Art’s in their anthologies—many years
ago. I recognized a few of the short stories contained in Art Taylor’s new
collection, The Boy Detective & The
Summer of ’74, but many were new to me. Reading some of them individually
over years didn’t provide the same experience as reading them together. Themes
emerged from the collection I hadn’t gleaned before, threads weaving them
together.
I’ve admired Art’s work for years, but after the
release of On The Road with Del and
Louise, I was hooked. Here’s a link
to my previous interview with him. Please welcome Art Taylor back to
WWK.
E. B. Davis
Many of your stories take place in North Carolina.
Were you born and raised there?
I was indeed—Eastern North Carolina specifically. I grew
up in a very small, very rural town—Richlands, NC—which had a population less
than 1000 when I lived there, as I remember. I also lived in Goldsboro and in
Raleigh—small town to larger city, which gave me a sense of Southern life and
culture across a range of experiences. Not all of my stories are set in the
South, but many are, perhaps most importantly the title story of the new collection,
set in a small-town NC town that has at least some surface resemblance to the
town I grew up in.
Is part of men’s chivalry toward women an effort to
save women from themselves—their weaknesses, loneliness? Is the other half to
civilize men who otherwise would act like beasts?
I would think it’s intended
as a little of both, but those intentions clearly are undergirded by several
layers of presumption and prejudice. The chivalric gesture comes with a lot of
burdens for everyone involved. The story “The Boy Detective & The Summer of
’74” covers a lot of territory in terms of gender relations: the title
character’s parents act along some traditional lines, with father as caretaker
and mother as nurturer, and meanwhile all the boys in the neighborhood are
struggling to figure out how to relate to the new girl who’s just moved into
the neighborhood, with Cooper Hobbes (the boy detective) veering between
taunting and teasing her along with his friends and trying to “be a man” and
stand up for her. There’s more here about attitudes toward women—protecting
them from others, protecting them from themselves, objectifying them…. This is
one of the subjects I set out to explore in the story.
What
are the parameters by which you assess a story to be finished?
At first I was tempted to answer this one by focusing on
the question of endings. What makes a good finish to a story? a satisfying
finish for the reader? Endings are maybe the hardest parts of a story to get
right, since I think the best endings have to balance an element of surprise
against a feeling of resolution and also have to be in sync with everything
that came before. It’s that latter point, however, that you have to focus on as
a writer of short stories before one feels finished—how the whole story works
in some kind of harmony: sufficient character development, well-paced conflicts
and plot progression, and then some pattern of themes or motifs to help it all
cohere. It takes a lot of rereading and revision for me to feel like a story is
somehow done.
Cooper, at an age of low double digits, plays at
being a detective and ends up solving the case. The knowledge he gains propels
him into adulthood. I felt sorry for him. Is there that one point in time when the
acquisition of knowledge causes us to suddenly become adults?
“The Boy Detective & The Summer of ’74” is indeed as
much of a coming-of-age story as it is a mystery, and Cooper’s coming-of-age
comes with some awareness of adult responsibility and of the consequences for
one’s actions, all of it tied up with some new knowledge of both the world
around him and his own place in it. In fiction, I think it might be easier to
dramatize all that as a moment or series of moments, but real life is a lot
messier, those kinds of revelations often accruing weight over a larger span of
time.
Some of your characters seem insane or at least on
the edge of madness. Some live within the fictional plots they read, imagining their
real lives parallel to the fiction. Some create reality from their imaginings,
which doubles back and slams them. And some find a cruel or disturbing reality
when they thought they were pretending. How is anyone supposed to define
reality?
Ooh! A big question. Many of my characters are indeed
struggling to make sense of their worlds—often seeing events through a troubled
lens: whether preconceptions or prejudices or some blurry romanticism or, yes,
some level of madness. But I think that whatever the perception is, the reality
of the situation can still peek through—and sometimes that’s the point of the
story, with reality coming hard at a character who has misjudged things in some
way. A story like “Ithaca 37,” for example, depends almost entirely on an
unreliable narrator who can’t help but view things through the warped lens of
the movies he’s watched, but I think readers can see pretty quickly that he’s
not to be trusted and can understand what’s really going on, even if he,
unfortunately, never does.
Does each of us have two lives, one open and the
other running its course in secret?
Oh, goodness…. This does take us into some heavy
territory. Maybe it says more about me than about the world that I’d answer
yes? One of the things I try to do in my stories is to chart the differences
between how characters present themselves on the one hand and, on the other, what
they really want or how they really feel. I imagine most people have at some
point felt a distance between what they’re feeling, wanting, fearing, etc. and
what they’d like to admit to feeling,
wanting, fearing, etc. It’s probably overstatement to call each of those
moments “two lives,” but that distance, and the conflicts spanning that
distance, are indeed part of what interests me about the characters in my
stories, many of which are dealing with both inner conflicts and struggles with
other characters, often with a relationship between those internal and external
troubles. It’s good drama, at least!
Are only sociopaths and psychopaths sure of
themselves? Is this why I distrust politicians?
Ha! I think confidence can come from a variety of
places—some good, some not so much. I’ve
got a few characters who seem confident to the point of being cocksure, and
I’ll admit I don’t like those characters much myself.
Your stories enlightened me as to how men’s
relationships are fraught with difficulties. Men marginalize and objectify
women as a result of competition. Is there always competition resulting in dominance
or submission? Can there ever be equality or must the equality be earned by
measurement?
As I mentioned above in that question about chivalry,
gender relations can indeed be complicated—for everyone involved. Of all my
stories, “The Care & Feeding of Houseplants” seems the one that most
explores the issues of competition, marginalization, and objectification you’re
talking about. That story explores a love triangle: a married woman having an
affair with one of her co-workers, and then the co-worker invites the couple over
for dinner—in part so that he can ridicule the cuckolded husband. Yikes! Talk
about competition—and with that woman in the middle like a trophy of some kind
to be won or lost. Here’s a bit of background on that story. It took me several
years to write it, because the first drafts had two perspectives: the husband and the lover—which was the central
flaw of those early drafts. It was only after I added in another thread, all
from the woman’s point of view, that the story began to open up a little more,
come to full bloom (to play on the story’s title). It wasn’t that I’d meant to
objectify that character myself, at least I hope not, but giving her voice
definitely made the difference.
Is
there a real Delwood out there?
Oh, I hope so! If not in terms of his criminality, at
least in terms of his personality. I do find him very charming in his own way.
Louise narrated their journeys throughout On
the Road With Del & Louise—and to nod back to the previous question
about gender relations, competition, and dominance, it’s her voice that is the
real strength in that book, even as she struggles sometimes to feel like she’s
on equal footing with Del. But that said, I’ve often considered the idea of
returning to those characters and telling a story sometime from his point of view.
I was aghast that you said in the Author’s Notes
that “imagination and anxiety are two sides of the same coin” because
imagination to me is a happy place. I associate doubt and anxiety as two sides
of the same coin. But for you, it’s imagination?
I’m answering these questions in the middle of the night,
unable to sleep, anxious about everything going on in the world these days,
imagining—despite myself—some of the worst things that might still lie ahead.
Imagination isn’t always like that, of course. It can be magical, exciting,
liberating—and I guess that’s what I was trying to get at with my metaphor
there, even if I didn’t express it as cleanly as I could’ve: anxiety as the
flipside of some of the better qualities of imagination.
Hopefully I put imagination to good use in creating the
worlds of my stories, hopefully there’s plenty there for readers to enjoy, even
as characters struggle with their own troubles and anxieties.
Thanks so much for the interview today! I so much appreciated the questions here--digging deeply, philosophically even! Thanks for inviting me over.
ReplyDeleteTo me, Art's work is the very definition of short story writing. So pleased to see that he has a new collection out.
ReplyDeleteThanks so much, Kathleen!
ReplyDeleteCongratulations, Art, on your recent publications and for your numerous awards and nominations. It is good seeing your hard work acknowledged.
ReplyDeleteWonderful interview with one of my very favorite authors!!
ReplyDeleteVery nice interview! Thanks, Art and Elaine. I always pick up gems from Art Taylor.
ReplyDeleteA wonderful interview, Elaine and Art!!
ReplyDeleteWhat a terrific interview, Art and Elaine. Art's work and your questions, Elaine, remind me that stories may be shorter than novels but can be just as rich in themes, and dramatic power. Congratulations on the new collection, Art!
ReplyDeleteGreat interview. I love mystery short stories.
ReplyDeleteHi, Grace, Terrie, Kaye, Marilyn, Shari, and Warren — Thanks so much for the kind welcomes and kind words! Sorry I've been so slow to get back to comments page; we've been figuring out distance learning in several directions today... and by "figuring out" I'm sometimes meaning not figuring out, so..... Appreciate everyone checking in!
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for the interview, Art. I enjoyed reading your collection and learned quite a bit more than I knew about your work than before. Good luck with it, and I hope to read more of your work soon!
ReplyDeleteWhat a wonderful interview! Enjoyed reading this.
ReplyDeleteHaving read your work, I know you're a terrific writer, but I can also sense what a terrific professor you must be, Art, from these words (and other interviews you've given). Very thoughtful.
Congrats again on your new collection!
Thanks again, Elaine, for the great interview! And thanks, Cynthia, for the kind words on both my writing and my teaching. I so much appreciate. :-)
ReplyDeleteGreat interview, Art. Enjoyed this!
ReplyDeleteThanks, John!
ReplyDelete