As
a life-long Catholic, I was thrilled when Pope Francis came to our country. Not
only because he’s a humble and a caring pope for the poor, who impressed
thousands of people while here, and not just Catholics. To see the massive crowds
hoping to get even a glimpse of him was so touching to me, and made me realize he
is more popular than any politician, rock star or movie star and with complete
humility. I wished I’d been able to go with a group from my church that went to
Philadelphia to be there when he came.
But
in addition to that, I was happy to hear how he took a stance supporting global
warming, and said it was our duty not only to acknowledge it, but to do what we
can to reverse it or at the very least to stop it. I never cease to be dumbfounded
when I hear the deniers of human caused global warming saying it’s not caused
by humans, or the doubters who are almost as bad.
From
a recent visit to California, I could see how bad the drought is there. According
to a New York Times article 8-20-15, by
Justin Gillis, California Drought Is Made
Worse by Global Warming, Scientist’s Say “Global warming caused by human emissions has
most likely intensified the drought in California by 15 to 20 percent,
scientists said . . . warning that future dry spells in the state are almost
certain to be worse than this one as the world continues to heat up.” Later he quotes A. Park Williams, a climate
scientist at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University and
the lead author published by the journal Geophysical
Research Letters. “This would be a fairly bad drought no matter what. But
it’s definitely made worse by global warning."
Richard
Seager, a senior climate scientist at Lamont and a co-author with Williams, said
“It really is quite simple. When the atmosphere is as warm as it is, the air is
capable of holding far more water. So more of the precipitation that falls on
the ground is evaporated, and less is in the soil, and less gets into streams.”
Gillis further wrote that "The National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration also reported recently in August that global
temperatures in July had been the hottest for any month since record-keeping
began in 1880, and that the first seven months of 2015 had also been the hottest
such period ever. Heat waves on several continents this summer have killed
thousands of people.”
He
writes further “The paper on the California drought echoes a growing body of
research that has cited the effects of human emissions, and even scientists not
involved in the work described it as more thorough than any previous effort
because it analyzed nearly every possible combination of data on temperature,
rainfall, wind speed and other factors that could be influencing the severity
of the drought.”
The
research, said David B. Lobell, a Stanford University climate scientist, is
“probably the best I’ve seen on this question.”
When
I researched my blog on trees in trouble, I watched a video of a young
scientist who studies trees. She said the large and very old California redwood
trees are in danger of dying from lack of water. That would be such a shame to
have those ancient trees die off.
In
an article in Climate Change 2015 Wed.
2015-04-15 by Philip Ross, he wrote “NASA launched its Atmospheric Infrared
Sounder, or AIRS, project in 2002. It was designed to gauge global
temperatures, greenhouse gases and cloud cover. Scientists are taking a giant
step back – hundreds of miles back, in fact, to put climate change in clearer
focus. (http://www.ibtimes.com/climate-change-affect-florida-coral-reefs-sooner-thought-bleaching-outbreaks-could-be-1870718)
Twelve years of NASA satellite data is helping researchers better understand
the role cloud cover and water vapor play in global warming. And what they see
is anything but encouraging.
NASA
has confirmed what’s long been suspected: that global warming begets more warming.
As Earth’s surface temperatures rise, levels of water vapor in the atmosphere
increase. More moisture in the atmosphere means more cloud cover, and more
cloud cover only exacerbates the warming effect of greenhouse gasses in the
atmosphere.”
Philip
Ross ends his article with, “The ongoing climate change debate continues to
elicit a strong response from both deniers and believers. Even though 98% of
scientists worldwide agree that climate change is real and happening because of
humans, many Americans continue to deny man’s hand in global warming. Nearly
one in five people in the U.S. say climate change is a hoax, while 63 percent
say it’s real."
In
my opinion, the horrific wildfires in the west should be sufficient to have
everyone believing global warming is serious. In the past I spent a delightful
vacation in the Okanogan area of Washington State, and it sickened me when I
heard of the massive wildfires in that area. And what about the flooding in
coastal towns in the east from hurricanes, or the fact that this year I’ve had
an excessive amount of rain while the west suffers? Rain that has set records
going back many, many years. What about the melting of the glaciers and the
rising of the sea levels?
Makes me feel guilty about complaining about too much rain |
And
some of the denial is ignorance, too, by people who don’t follow the news
unless it has something to do with movie stars, etc. A nurse my California
daughter worked with didn’t believe there was a real shortage of water and
wasn’t going to do anything to conserve water because there was all that water
in the Pacific Ocean. My daughter, who religiously conserves water, was quite
frustrated with the woman.
I
agree with all those who care about the environment and have even before the
whole topic of global warming came up. I’ve been recycling for at least
forty-five years when the first recycling center opened up in our county ten
miles away from where I lived then. Now there are recycling centers in almost
every community which doesn’t give anybody an excuse not to recycle. I drive a
small car for the same reason, and save on electricity as much as possible by
hanging clothes out spring through fall weather permitting, and turn off
lights, etc. when not needed. I also compost almost everything that can be
composted. I only hope more will be done
to help save the only planet we have.
I
downloaded five or six articles on the topic, but because of space limitations,
I could only use several and even in those articles I could not include
everything that was written. If you want to learn more about global warming,
just go to Google, and you’ll find enough to keep you reading for a long
time, and you'll find many, many sad pictures of the flooding in South Carolina.
What
is your opinion of Global Warming?
What
do you do to help our planet?
The pope was a scientist before he joined the church, which may help him combine scientific ideas and religious beliefs.
ReplyDeletewhat a mess we've created! California is a beautiful state, ravaged by earthquakes, wildfires, and now the drought.
ReplyDeleteWe lived through a drought in Atlanta with severe water restrictions including no outside use. Each shower had a plastic bucket to catch water for deep-watering bushes and trees. I hauled washing machine gray water for the same purpose. We washed the cars during a rainstorm.
Nothing is sweeter than sheets hung out to dry in the summer sun.
Thanks, Gloria, for an interesting blog. I think his message went beyond global warming to include the importance of taking better care of our planet overall. A good solid message for people of all faiths.
ReplyDeleteA survey of scientific journals showed 97% of papers supported the proposition that human activities were in large part responsible for the documented global warming trends over the last century. Does that mean they are right? NO. Does that mean the 3% are Wrong? NO.
ReplyDeleteDoes it mean we can ignore the 97%? Only at our peril. Here is my proposition: If (as I and the 97% agree) human activity is causing global warming and if (as the huge preponderance of models show) global warming is harmful to humans (not to mention the other animals and plants), then it is well worth whatever money we spend now to prevent as much global warming as we can, because we will spend many times more in remediation of the results of doing nothing. If I and the 97% are wrong, we have wasted a lot of money, but that is all we have lost from being wrong.
If the 3% and all their fans who urge we do nothing (or wring their hands and choose to do nothing) prevail and we do nothing and they are wrong, eventually we make Earth uninhabitable for most species, likely including homo sapiens. They have gambled away our future.
I'm old and will die anyway before the worst consequences. But I want to place my bets so all generations can live, not just mine. I would rather be wrong and waste money, than be wrong and ruin the planet for everyone.
~ Jim
I tried to insert a link to the 97% reference, but it didn't take. It is http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
ReplyDeleteI recently spoke to a friend who has lived in Southern California her whole life. She said this was the hottest summer she remembers. Her neighbors are tearing up their lawns and using rocks or fake grass to landscape.
ReplyDeleteWarren, that is so true. He us up to date on problems in the world.
ReplyDeleteMargaret, my daughter keeps a bucket in her shower, too. She's still trying to find someone who knows how to connect the gray water gismo she got to save water from her washing machines.
I think there's not much that smells sweeter than sheets dried outside on the line when I crawl into bed when I've just made the bed with them.
Grace, I agree with you.
Jim, you make total sense. I probably won't live to see all the damage that will be done to our world, but I care about those coming after be it may be human or other life forms.
Kara, my daughter hasn't been a homeowner long, but she has turned to mulching her whole yard and using rocks and drought tolerant plants, and she said the heat is horrible, too.
Gloria on KM's laptop at Bouchercon