If you are interested in blogging or want to promote your book, please contact E. B. Davis at writerswhokill@gmail.com

Our May author interviews: Marla Cooper-5/3, Rhys Bowen-5/10, Cindy Brown-5/17, Martha Reed-5/24, Sherry Harris--5/31.

Saturday Guest Bloggers in May--Paty Jager-5/6 and Maren Anderson-5/13. WWK Saturday bloggers write on 5/20--Margaret S. Hamilton and on 5/27--Kait Carson. E. B. Davis blogs this month on 5/30.

“May 16, 2017 – The Women’s Fiction Writers Association (WFWA) today announced the finalists of the second annual Star Award, given to authors of published women’s fiction. Six finalists were chosen in two categories, General and Outstanding Debut. The winners of the Star Award will be announced at the WFWA Retreat in Albuquerque, New Mexico on September 23, 2017.”

In the general category, WWK’s Carla Damron was one of three finalist for her novel, The Stone Necklace. Go to Carladamron.com for more information. Congratulations, Carla!

Congratulations to our writers for the following publications:

Warren Bull's new Lincoln mystery, Abraham Lincoln In Court & Campaign has been released. Look for the Kindle version on February 3.

Shari Randall's "Pets" will be included in Chesapeake Crimes: Fur, Feathers, and Felonies anthology, which will be published in 2018. In the same anthology "Rasputin," KM Rockwood's short story, will also be published. Her short story "Goldie" will be published in the Busted anthology, which will be released by Level Best Books on April 25th.

In addition, our prolific KM will have the following shorts published as well: "Sight Unseen" in Fish Out of Water, Guppie (SinC) anthology, just released, and "Making Tracks" in Passport to Murder, Bouchercon anthology, October 2017.

Margaret S. Hamilton's short story, "Once a Kappa" was published as a finalist in the Southern Writer's Magazine annual short story contest issue. Mysterical-E published her "Double Crust Corpse" in the Fall 2016 issue. "Baby Killer" will appear in the 2017 solar eclipse anthology Day of the Dark to be published this summer prior to the eclipse in August.

Linda Rodriquez has two pending book publications. Plotting the Character-Driven Novel will be released by Scapegoat Press on November 29th. Every Family Doubt, the fourth Skeet Bannion mystery, is scheduled for release on October, 18, 2017. Look for the interview by E. B. Davis here on that date!

James M. Jackson's 4th book in the Seamus McCree series, Doubtful Relations, is now available. His novella "Low Tide at Tybee" appears February 7 as part of Lowcountry Crimes: Four Novellas, which is available for order.


Sunday, October 11, 2015

Black Box Concerns

I started out my home computer life an Apple guy. In 1985 I bought an Apple IIe. The “e” meant it was enhanced from the original Apple II. I chose the 128KB of RAM memory instead of the standard 64KB because I was a heavy computational user. My most recent computer, a Dell XPS 8700, has 8GB of RAM (a 62,500 times increase). For a few bucks more I could have had another 8GB of RAM, but I didn’t need it. My first machine handled 8 bits of data at a time; the new one handles 64 bits. Processing speed differences (how quickly data is processed) are just as great.

I opted for two external 5.25” floppy disk drives on my Apple IIe. Each disk held (I think) about 360KB of data. Then came double density disks with 720KB of data. Today I have an internal drive with 1TB of data and external drives with 2TB of data and cloud storage of another 2TB of data. I even have little thumb drives that carry 32GB of data (over 40,000 times as much storage as one of those floppies). Those Apple disk drives were great, though. They could read mud on cardboard. That computer still functioned, as did its disk drives, when I finally gave them to my father (circa 1993) to act as backup for his own Apple IIe system that contained all the backup material for his published textbook.

I cannot tell you how many crashed hard drives and thumb drives I have had to pitch since then because they no longer worked.

But surely, you say, my life is better with this more advanced technology. In my IIe days I had a spreadsheet program (Visicalc) that even in its early versions would still do 99+% of the work I do on spreadsheets today. I had a word processing program (whose name I no longer recall).

The only major word processing improvements in the 30 years since that I would find it difficult to do without are Microsoft Word’s style sheets and review functions. Occasionally in the old days I could get in a typing groove and get ahead of the computer recognizing keyboard strokes. There was a buffer so I didn’t lose the work, but it did force me to slow down every once in a while.

So why do I use Microsoft-based products now instead of Apple? Well, despite writing the first program to determine the cost of post-retirement medical programs for our clients on my little Apple IIe (it took 20 hours to execute with a Fortune 10 company’s data!) my employer moved to the “Wintel” computers (Windows operating system and Intel chips) and it made sense for me to follow suit.

So why, you wonder, this burst of nostalgia? Just the ramblings of an old man who walked ten miles to and from school each day and it was uphill in both directions? A strong desire to return to a circa 1985 squarish green screen and flashing white cursor? Hardly.

No, for the last month I’ve had to deal with Windows 10. Microsoft has reported over 100 million computers now run the Windows 10 operating system. I have two of them and the experience has been anything but satisfactory for me. I won’t belabor all the issues I’ve had; suffice it to say I have spent many hours searching for fixes, finally finding (most of) them, and implementing them. One computer was a brand new desktop that came loaded with Windows 10; the other is a laptop I migrated from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10.

All those hours I spent repairing my Windows 10 installations, a bloated product that includes myriad things I do not want, were hours I did not spend writing, or reading, or watching birds, or photographing nature or any one of the top 1,000 things I would do with my life if I had not tied myself to the computer world. It also got me thinking of the hidden costs of our technology.

My recent frustration and time spent getting Windows running properly is only a small part of the hidden cost of my long-ago choice to use computers. In the Apple IIe days, I could pop the lid and add a printer board to connect to my dot matrix printer or add a second operating system (CP/M) to access a freeware word processing program. There were so few parts, I could fix anything and understand what I was doing.

Now, unscrew the cover of a laptop and you likely invalidate the warranty. And it might not even do much good—one accidental move and you may fry your motherboard. And don’t get me started on the software. Programs were efficient in the dark ages because there was no room for inefficiency. With the early Apple operating system, I could peek and poke and adjust anything (those are actually technical terms). Now almost all software are black boxes.

I give it some input; it gives me some output. I have no idea what happens in between.

That’s life in America. Ask Google or Siri a question and a list of possible answers appears. Your answers will not be the same as the ones I get because one of the software’s algorithms has been paying attention to our preferences. Ask two GPS devices how to go from point A to B and you might get two “best” answers. How am I to know which to choose? Do I have to look at a paper map or do a third search to break the tie? When I was traveling from Savannah to Raleigh to attend Bouchercon, my phone’s GPS knew that I-95 was closed through much of South Carolina because of recent flooding. My Garmin GPS (which has in the past told me of even minor delays along a route) had no clue and kept trying to get me to turn around when I took the detour.

It’s a black box problem.

We confront more of them daily. We provide input; a black box provides output; we have no idea what happened in between. We have to trust the process and even when we know it is broken, we can’t fix it.

We don’t know how Google (or Bing or whoever) determines what articles appear first on search. If we’re authors we need to learn about and worry about and fret about SEO (Search Engine Optimization). For example, when you type in “James M Jackson Author” I want my name to come up first. And when Google decides mobile friendly websites will be favored in their searches, we must rush to comply with their desires to retain our prized search rankings.

We shop online and often an algorithm (not a person) determines what price we see based on other posted online prices, the time of day, day in the week, month of the year, where else our cookies tell them we have looked. Everywhere we examine things closely we find more black boxes.

Some say this is efficient, good for us, definitely progress.

I sense this further disconnect from understanding how things actually work is not a good trend. I can’t prove it, but I sense it.

Or maybe I’ve gotten to be the old man who walked ten miles to school each way and both ways were uphill.

~ Jim


E. B. Davis said...

I put some codes from Google analytics into my website. It fouled the website's operation, I guess, blocking code. So, I removed the codes and haven't been back to reread the Google optimization manual since I now distrust it.

I've heard about all the trouble everyone is having with Windows 10. Rather than pay for testing, I think most software companies, release and let their paying public test and troubleshoot for them. Don't we have enough beta reading to do already?

KM Rockwood said...

Seems like whenever I get something figured out on the use of electronic devises, it gets changed. I never did understand how any of it worked (I don't understand how my car works, either) and I'd greatly prefer no changes at all. Additions, perhaps, but no changes. The scariest words are "no longer supported" for something I use regularly.

James Montgomery Jackson said...

EB -- One does have to be careful when adding code that it doesn't interfere with other code. Everyone seems to think they are the only ones that exist. And that's probably part of the Windows 10 issues I experienced.

And the big software does use lots of beta testers, but that will never catch everything.

Planned obsolescence, is an annoying strategy for those of us happy with what we already have, isn't it KM.

~ Jim

Margaret Turkevich said...

I'm working on my 2008 Toshiba, parked on its cooling pad. Slow, but reliable, the equivalent of my college Smith Corona typewriter. I constantly find messages that gmail or yahoo or the NYT don't like my browser and to do something about it. The same with Windows 10. Something I must install? I don't think so.

James Montgomery Jackson said...

Margaret -- Here's hoping that nothing breaks because as KM said, eventually they stop supporting old software and then you dead if something goes wrong.

~ Jim

Warren Bull said...

I first used a computer that ran on punch cards and occupied a a whole room. It ran on Fortran 4. The next time I used a computer was 19 years later. My, how things had changed. What irritates me most is the refusal to support earlier versions of software, which forces everyone to buy the newest version.

Grace Topping said...

One of the problems is that companies, to be competitive, pack their products with more and more features. This just makes them more complex, more expensive, and have more things that can go wrong. I've read that most users only use a small portion of the functions offered. This can be said about computer software all the way to military tanks, ships and aircraft. Developers have added so many features as to make the equipment almost impossible to operate. Gone are the days when soldiers could take apart and repair their Jeeps. I firmly believe that the next war will be won by the guy on a horse with a sword.

Kara Cerise said...

I read an August 19, 2015 Politico article by Robert Epstein (former editor-in-chief for Psychology Today). He believes that Google could rig elections in a few different ways. One of his scenarios is Google's algorithms, propelled by user activity, could push a candidate to the top of the search rankings. Based on experiments Epstein conducted, he found that opinions and voting preferences also shifted in the direction of the candidate who was favored in the rankings. Basically a computer program could pick elected officials.

Kait said...

Make me laugh till I cry, why don't cha. Oh, Jim. You are singing my song.

My first computer was a Compaq I bought it in 1989. It ran Lotus123 and Wordstar and it was bulletproof. It even took a load of WP5.1 when I asked it to and kept on trucking. Of course, it used 5.5" floppys and you had to understand the DOS tree to get anywhere. I wrote my first two books on it. Loved it.

By 1995 it was clear that Windows was taking over the world, and worse, my job switched from DOS operating system (so not true, they all run on DOS, you just don't see it anymore) to Windows. One of the other secretaries (as we were called in the day) quit because, "I don't do Windows." The comment was hysterical in it's time. That's when I gave my old Compaq to my good friend, taught her to use it, and bought an Acer, with Windows 95, and Word. The Compaq lasted until 2005 when my friend could no longer find a parallel port printer to replace the one I had given her. Try getting that service out of 'new' computer!

When my husband bought a new laptop last year (year before? Don't recall) it had Windows 8. Let me preface this by saying my husband is a real life rocket scientist. He has built computers. I know this is true because we have one in our home. It's an 8080. It does not run Windows anything. Anyway, he got so tired of finding fixes for the bloat of Windows 8 did whatever he did and then loaded it with Windows 7. Fortunately we had one seat remaining on our license. I know I will be in need of new laptop soon. I'm hoping they will have retro Windows by then. Pick your favorite!

James Montgomery Jackson said...

Warren -- my first computer experience was in 1968 when our final for a high school course was to run our Fortran program on the University of Rochester's computer. When I started working in 1972 we ran our programs on an IBM 1401 and an IBM 7094 with their tape drives and heavily air conditioned room.

Grace -- I believe the common name for overgrown programs is "Bloatware." And you are right. I would be happy to be able to customize my installation so I could eliminate 90% of the stuff in many of the programs I use. And I'd be happy to still use the first version of WordPerfect or even of Microsoft Word I ever used. (Back then I knew ALL the shortcut keys.)

Kara -- excellent example of a black box problem. Another one affecting elections are the electronic voting machines that do not provide printed backup. Just a bit of software code (similar to what VW just did with their emissions testing) and one our of every five votes for candidate A is changed to candidate B and what a surprise, B wins.

Oh Kait -- I could do just about anything when the shell was straight DOS -- once they went to their "higher shells" (my term because I'm too tired from the overly long trip home from Bouchercon to come up with the correct term) hid the underlying DOS.

~ Jim

Gloria Alden said...

I started out with an Apple, too, and I loved it. When it finally quit on me after years and years, I went with several others all with Microsoft windows. I couldn't afford another Apple because they are quite pricey. I keep getting something that pops up from Microsoft offering a free download of Windows 10, but I chose not to do it. Now I'm glad I haven't done it.