by Linda Rodriguez
I’m a poet
and novelist of Cherokee lineage who writes about a Cherokee protagonist, so I
get contacted repeatedly by people who want me to give them a crash course in
being Cherokee (or even just Native) because they’ve decided to make the
protagonists of their books, or even a whole series, Cherokee (or just Native).
These are people who know nothing about the Cherokee, not even the most basic
information, and apparently have no Cherokee friends or acquaintances. My
attitude toward them, I’m afraid, is not sympathetic. Basically, these folks
are saying to me, “I want an ‘exotic Indian’ protagonist and the Cherokee are
the most famous tribe, so I’ll choose them, but I have no real interest in the
culture or knowing anyone in it. I’m too lazy to do any research on the most
documented tribe in American history (the
Cherokee were over 90% literate in their own written language and had a
bilingual newspaper long before the Removal in the 1830s and have the biggest,
most thoroughly helpful website now—the first thing you hit when you search the
internet for Cherokee), so please do my research for me. Maybe I’ll use it,
or maybe I’ll just do what I want to do, whether it’s true to the culture or
not, while putting your name down as the ‘expert’ I consulted. Because I
clearly don’t give a real damn.”
Indigenous cultures have been misrepresented by settler
anthropologists and folklore collectors for centuries. An awful lot of books,
especially novels, written by outsiders to a culture end up written from the
viewpoint of caricatures rather than real people, and the culture is presented
as a collection of stereotypes of that culture (often derived from those very
misrepresenting researchers). These books almost always, in one way or another,
diminish or denigrate those cultures.
If we keep to our circumscribed lives, how can we
realistically create characters who are different from ourselves? How can we
learn if we only read people who think and write the same way we do? As writers,
we need to use our reading to add breadth to our experiences. To do that, we
must read people who are different from us—people who write differently and
think differently, people who have had different experiences in life from ours.
There is a whole world of books out there by people whose whole experience of
life has been different from yours. At one time, the only books to be found
were written by wealthy educated European white men. Now, we can read and learn
from the experiences of Latina lawyers, overachieving Chinese law professor
mothers, Filipino labor organizers, and African American choreographers.
Biographies and autobiographies and memoirs are a wonderful resource for this
broadening of experience, as are poetry and fiction by these diverse authors. One
of the best ways to get an initial feel for the diversity of experience within
a culture is to read an anthology of writers from that culture. Your characters
will thank you, as will your readers.
I have a couple of new anthologies that might be helpful to anyone interested in writing Native or Chicano characters. These books provide poems, essays, and short fiction from a variety of writers within those communities, thus providing you with a wide variety of personal viewpoints on Native or Chicano life in modern-day America. These can be valuable resources to begin the kind of in-depth research that a writer must do to write honestly and authentically about such communities.
The first is Puro
Chicanx Writers of the 21st Century. https://www.amazon.com/Puro-Chicanx-Writers-21st-Century/dp/1732017018
This 359-page anthology, edited by Octavio Quintanilla, Carmen Tafolla, Luis
Alberto Urrea and Edward Vidaurre, Teresa Acevedo, Carmen Calatayud, Denise
Chavez, and Matt Mendez, “includes authors such as Sandra Cisneros, Ana
Castillo, Alberto Rios, Gary Soto, Octavio Solis, Lorna Dee Cervantes, Linda
Rodriguez, Rafael J. Gonzales, Raul Sanchez, Diana Marie Delgado, Juan J.
Morales, Jenn Givhan, Reyna Grande, Myriam Gurba,” among many others. The book’s “focus is on Chicanx culture that has been a large
part of this country for hundreds of years and is still under-explored and
understood only at a distance by the dominant culture.”
The second is When the Light of the World Was Subdued,
Our Songs Came Through: A Norton Anthology of Native Nations
Poetry. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393356809
This “anthology of poetry from more than 160 poets, representing close to 100 Indigenous
nations” was edited by U.S. Poet Laureate Joy Harjo with LeAnne Howe and
Jennifer Elise Foerster. If Natives are depicted in modern America, at all, "usually
it's through images that we did not construct but were constructed by
nightmares and takeover," Harjo says. If, as a novelist, you wonder how
this 400-page book of poems can be relevant to you, remember that the poet writes
about the specifics of her/his life and traffics in sensory detail, imagery,
description, and emotional reactions. All of these can bring a level of
authenticity to your own work.
Stereotypes about drunken Indians (statistics show white
people drink more per capita) and (nonexistent) free government handouts for
Native people fueled a lot of rage behind support for the pipeline corporation
and its private security guards who assaulted peaceful people with pepper spray
and attack dogs (that had not been properly trained as K9 dogs but just made
aggressive as trainers do for dog fighting).
Stereotypes about Latinos as gangbangers and drug dealers
fuel a lot of the hate-filled rhetoric about ridding the country of all
Latinos. The vast majority of Latinos in this country are peaceful,
hard-working, family-oriented people, not members of gangs or criminals of any
sort. The only way to do instant mass deportations of undocumented immigrants
is to go door-to-door, and history tells us that when the United States does
this, it ends up with 60% American citizens in the millions deported with much
loss of life and loss of owned homes and businesses.
The things we think we know about other cultures that are
wrong can do tremendous harm, especially when wielded by an author with a
good-sized audience. So, we need to get it right. We live in an
ever-diversifying world, yet most of the books published in the U.S. are
basically white, Anglo, middle-to-upper-class, heterosexual, and able-bodied.
This gives a terribly distorted view of our society, and since our literature
informs the way we think about our world and its problems, it short-circuits
our emotional and intellectual consideration of those. This is the situation,
not because publishers, editors, and writers are evil racists, but simply
because it's comfortable and easiest. To try to become a part of more
accurately reflecting and considering our world is a noble thing to do, in my
view, but it's not comfortable or easy.
One thing to remember about research on other cultures is
that much of it is wrong, accidentally or willfully. Accidentally, because
anthropologists and explorers may have misinterpreted what they saw or heard or
because—and this was common—because their informants deliberately misinformed
them to protect their people or to protect their own source of whatever the settlers
were providing them. Consequently, even primary sources from past times can be
contaminated if they are “as told to” or are translated. Willfully, because a
lot of that research was done by people, usually men, who had an agenda that
placed white male Europeans at the pinnacle of creation and everyone and
everything else downhill from that, which led to eugenics and a lot of other
horrid, stupid things. So there's your first caveat: You can do research and
still get it wrong, so this is why you want to use writings by members of that culture..
There are dangers in writing about a culture that's not
your own, and those dangers are especially fierce if you're a middle-class-or-above,
white, heterosexual, able-bodied writer. First of all, simply by writing about
that Other, you may well be keeping a member of that culture from being able to
publish their book set authentically in their own culture. It's not your fault,
but publishing is a very white, often dumb business. A publisher who publishes
your book about XYZ culture will then say to everyone else who submits, “We
have our XYZ book already.” And other publishers will often say, “That
publisher does XYZ books, so we can't.” The mindset of mainstream publishing is
that the world needs an infinity of books about the world of middle-class or
rich heterosexual able-bodied white people, but the number of books it can
handle about people of color, of varying genders, of the “lower” classes, of
varying physical and mental abilities is extremely limited. And because of this
limited experience and worldview, a publisher is much more likely to buy a book
by a white, able-bodied, middle-class, heterosexual writer about XYZ culture
instead of a book by someone from XYZ culture—simply because they will share
the same assumptions and perspectives, and it will feel less foreign and
uncomfortable to the publisher.
So, the people who get angry about someone from the
mainstream writing about their culture and keeping their own voices from being
heard have a real point. There's your first danger: People may be angry with
you, even if you get things right, because they see your book as preventing a
person of that culture from writing and publishing—and they’re not entirely
wrong.
Do whatever you can to help writers from that culture to
reach success—signal boost, give blurbs, mentor, recommend, whatever you can
do. And continue to do this. Your book may be out there in the marketplace for
a long time. Make sure you're helping people from that community be heard for
at least as long. Aside from being the right thing to do, it's good karma. Above
all, know that what you're doing in trying to diversify your writing is
absolutely important. Many of the problems we have with racism, sexism, homophobia,
able-ism, classism, and all kinds of xenophobia stem from the damaging
stereotypes that are continually presented about other cultures and the people
living in them. You are changing the world for the better when you change that.
This is wonderful, Linda. Thank you for the reminders, the information, and the recommended reading.
ReplyDeleteFabulous blog, Linda. It should be required reading for all writers. Thank you for the reading list.
ReplyDeleteGreat resource. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteWriters who are inspired to create peoples and cultures with which they are not familiar can develop their own fantasy worlds. Even with extensive research, it's very difficult to develop realistic characters from an entirely different background from one's own.
ReplyDeleteIt's such a challenge. We are encouraged to be inclusive and have characters of different backgrounds and ethnicities, but can't know enough of being raised in a different life. Particularly a problem if making that character a POV of course, but even minor characters can be a challenge. I'm curious how others handle it!
ReplyDeleteThis is terrific, Linda, and I look forward to checking out the reading list. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThanks so much, Molly. I hope you find the anthologies helpful.
ReplyDeleteKait, you are too kind, but I too wish something like this was required reading for authors, so we'd be spared some of the awful stuff written about Native and Latinx characters.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Margaret.
ReplyDeleteKM, you are SO right! Their own fantasy worlds is exactly what they create, often having nothing at all to do with the reality of the lives people in those cultures actually live.
ReplyDeleteTammy, research from the first-person writing of members of those cultures. Getting to know actual living people from those cultures. Those are the best ways to write authentically about those cultures--and if you're not writing authentically, can you really be writing well.
ReplyDeleteShari, I think you will enjoy those anthologies.
ReplyDelete