Someone I know described another person as listening to “all
the news that fits his views.” Most of us filter our news so that we tend to
hear things that fit our beliefs. The content providers out there try mightily
with their targeted ads to figure out our preferences. Based on my searches, they
have decided I am more likely to respond to an ad for Obama than one for Romney
and when I search on an issue, the more liberal slant seems to come up more
often near the top of the list of choices I’m presented with.
Google Alerts provides an opportunity to defeat one-sided
analysis. If you are not familiar with Google Alerts it works like this: tell
them a phrase you are interested in and they will search news, blogs, videos,
discussions and books and send you the information in an email. You can choose
a daily digest (my general choice) or “as it happens” or a weekly summary. You
can also let them choose only the “best results” or everything. Since often my
purpose is to get a wider view of things, I always make the inclusive
“everything” choice.
Let’s say you are interested in anything having to do with
one of my fellow bloggers, Warren Bull. Naturally you would want to bookmark
his website, but for a true fan that would not be
enough. You want to know about every mention of him. If you do a Google Alert
on Warren Bull, you will get anything that includes the words Warren and Bull,
whether or not they are capitalized. So if someone thinks the selection of the
current winner of the Warren Spahn Award for baseball’s best left-handed
pitcher is bullroar, that rant will show up. To eliminate that problem you put
the name in quotes: “Warren Bull,” which requires Warren and Bull to be
consecutive words. Still, things like an article entitled “Rodeo: Bothwell wins
at Crazy Horse” will pop up because of a reference to Warren’s bull.
Sometimes those articles are very interesting and you would
have never seen them without your Google Alert terms. However, if “Warren Bull”
still gets you too many wrong people, you might limit Google Alert’s search by
including the word author (so your search terms are [“Warren Bull” author].
Initially I chose more limiting Alert rules, but I’ve learned I often miss
things I wish I’d seen—and the opportunity for serendipity has been lost.
You may wonder what terms I currently have Google Alerts set
for. I’m egotistical enough to want to know if someone says something about me,
but there are too many Jim Jacksons for that to do any good, so I use “James
Montgomery Jackson.” I do have an alert for [“Jim Jackson” author], which
occasionally relates to me but mostly allows me to see what the other authorial
Jim Jacksons are doing. I also have one with my name and residence [“Jim
Jackson” Amasa] that mostly comes back with bridge tournament results.
I also have a number of Alerts with the title of my books,
including my published, One Trick at a Time, my novel Bad Policy that has been accepted for publication, and my
work-in-progress Cabin Fever. I also have Google Alerts on
my major protagonists. I get a few extraneous hits on “One Trick at a Time”
that provide fodder for future stories. “Bad Policy” gets a lot of Republicans
grousing about Obamacare and lots of Democrats complaining about state-level
Republican efforts. Occasionally something new will cross my radar. Recently I
became aware of US House Bill 1505 that would allow the Customs and Border
Patrol the ability to build any kind of infrastructure they want anywhere
within 100 miles of an international border (other than ocean), and would
abrogate any and all environmental, wilderness, national park, etc. laws to accomplish
something the Border Patrol says is not needed. That prompted me to write my
senators and representative to express my concerns.
“Cabin Fever” garners the most eclectic results ranging from
vacation hotspots to comments on the 2002 movie by that name, to a new album bythat name by Corb Lund, an Alberta country singer I had never heard of, but whose album sounds like a
lot of fun, to vacation hotspots.
Occasionally some topic of interest will get my attention
and I’ll add it to my Alerts to see what everyone is saying. Last year I was
interested in “redistricting” so I could follow the political battles in the
states as they Gerrymandered new voting districts.
Currently, my catch-all Alert is “financial crime.” My mystery/suspense
series involves financial crimes and, while I have a great imagination, the
stuff people are pulling off—well, there ought to be a book!
Google Alerts are easy to set up and easy to remove. You can
get started at http://www.google.com/alerts
. If you use Google Alerts, what do you use it for? If not, what tempts you?
~ Jim
I put a google alert on my writing name, E. B. Davis. So far, I've found that there is a professional basketball player of the same name, and that a lot of E. (Elaine, Evelyn, etc.) Davis's have died recently. So, google alerts haven't done me much good.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds interesting, Jim, but I don't know how I could deal with one more time suck. I'm stretched to my limits now. Probably I'll sign up for it once I get a book out there. Right now I have enough trouble keeping up with what comes into my inbox as it is and still find time to write.
ReplyDeleteIt can be a time suck if you let it, and if you have a book out there or are writing short stories, not seeing your name pop up tells you something about your marketing efforts.
ReplyDeleteAs with much I do, it's an experiment that I will modify as I gather more experience.
I did just get an alert that "One Trick at a Time" just showed up in a blog -- oh right, that was this one!
~ Jim
Jim, I've used Google Alerts for years--on my name, on the name of an organization I helped found and run until recently, the Latino Writers Collective,and on my various books as they've come out (I had two books of poetry and a cookbook published before I entered the mystery field).
ReplyDeleteI have found that, in the past year for some reason, they don't catch nearly as much as they used to. EVERY LAST SECRET has received over 20 reviews and one was picked up by AP by about 20 newspapers across the country, almost all with online versions. All these pop up instantly if I do a Google search, but very few have shown up in my Google Alerts. I have to say that I don't think it's the great tool it once was.
Google alert is an app I have not tried. Maybe I can find out more about rodeos and cattle prices if I set one up.
ReplyDeleteI'm writing a novel that has money laundering in it. I did a google alert on money laundering and information rolled in. Much of it doesn't interest me and I can't use it. I did learn London is dubbed the money laundering capital of the world. Fifty years too late for me. Maybe I should have stayed and held out for the opportunity.
ReplyDeleteLinda - It's an experiment for me, so I'll see how it goes. Sorry it seems to have lost its usefulness for you.
ReplyDeleteWarren - you never know when you might want to learn about your very own bull!
Pauline - You could have stayed and help Barclays lie about their Libor rates. Of course if financial chicanery is in your blood, you can find work in a shady US hedge fund -- hard to believe Peregrine will be the last to fold due to malfeasance.
~ Jim
Interesting, but I only use my Google alerts for myself and my book. Never for 'interests' because then it (IMHO) it becomes spam. It's the bad of a good thing.
ReplyDeletePatg