Seems to me, mystery
writers are in the same boat, constantly being advised to have a hook. “I need
to be able to say it’s a cat mystery or a cooking mystery,” one agent told me.
“You need to layer something in so we can sell it to people who are interested
in that sort of thing.”
Problem is, all too often, those layers have the subtlety of ‘80’s leg warmers over stirrup pants. “Oh wait,” the amateur sleuth cries. “I can’t follow up on this clue until I meet with a new client for my free-lance astrophysics business.” Which is okay if astrophysics solves the crime – but all too often the business or hobby seems to be a concession to “we could call it an ‘astrophysics mystery’ on the cover.” And then the poor author gets stuck slotting in tips at the beginning of each chapter. (“80% of the universe is made up of invisible matter called ‘dark matter’.”)
I have nothing against
cooking, owning cats or practicing free-lance astrophysics. Amateur sleuths
should do something beside hang out with their police detective boyfriend
waiting for another body to drop. I just don’t want to hear about it in detail.
Even though Miss Marple knitted, Dame Agatha didn’t provide patterns in the
back of the book. Nero Wolfe raised
orchids yet Rex Stout never included propagation tips. They were first and
foremost detectives and didn’t need to dress it up with gauze and light bulbs.
Far from choosing
books because I share a hobby with the protagonist, I find myself rejecting
books whose covers proclaim “A Such and Such Mystery.” The obvious layering in
of a hook is beginning to bore me. Even more, I resent being told “I can’t sell
it without a hook.” One of these days, I’m just going to grab me a trumpet and take
off my clothes.
Vaudeville no longer
uses a giant hook to pull bad acts off stage. Is it time to retire the mandatory
hook in mysteries as well.
Hi, Cathy. Sleuths need to be rounded characters but I agree a hobby or hook doesn't necessarily accomplish that. There's their sex life and their demons, often alcohol, but that's been covered for years. Some authors manage to make their sleuths more than their role and I believe these authors accomplish this with voice and larger than life characters.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, Cathy, and yet some of those books are a lot of fun and every book needs some sort of premise. My main character sells champagne and sparkling wines. Does she solve the mystery using those skills? No, but an event she supplies puts her in the right place at the right time, and the fact of the matter is that I like those types of wines--so it's a natural for me.
ReplyDeleteFor myself, I like the sleuth using her unique skills in crime solving. Otherwise, why give her any special talents/interests/occupation at all? But that's my opinion. As for "hooks," more and more new authors are coming up with different hooks (sleuths in various careers) besides the standard pet/cooking/craft cozies. It's nice to have variety.
ReplyDeleteSally Carpenter
Another trend is to have sleuths with psychological problems. I enjoy Monk and Matt Scudder but with many authors their search for quirks is less successful. I read a short story once where the cop kept shoving gum into his mouth. by the end I wondered how he was able to talk at all.
ReplyDeletePS If I were less of a gentleman I'd ask about where and when your strip tease was scheduled.
I agree, Cathy, that "quirky" characters and gimmicks seem to be required. I don't much like this trend. And you're right, Miss Marple never gave knitting instructions!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Cathy especially when an agent/publisher suggests that the author write a character with a certain vocation. I once heard an author on a panel saying her agent/publisher wanted her to write a book with a female blacksmith as the protagonist. This author knew nothing about horses or blacksmithing. Still, I like reading about characters, who have some kind of profession,skill or interest that makes them more interesting. Because gardening is a passion of mine, my protagonist is a botanist and works part time at a large public gardens and has her own small garden center, too. She sort of falls into finding bodies.I made sure she's not much into cooking so I didn't need to put any recipes at the end of my books.
ReplyDeleteI like sleuths to have some interest outside of tracking murderers, but it probably needs to be one the writer has--like your champagne, E.B.--or it will wind up feeling artificial.
ReplyDeleteIn defense of agents and editors, they're trying to tell their authors what sells. We, the readers, are responsible for "what sells."
That's very good! I'm still grinning. I don't like calling a career choice a gimmick though.
ReplyDeleteEveryone in life has a lifestyle which includes a job, maybe a family, cats, dogs, horses, maybe they take up knitting etc. It's fun to integrate their life into their mysteries.
Great post, Cathy. I couldn't agree more, but that's because I don't read cutesy. I like my heroes and heroines smart and tough, and I want to know what makes them tick. Daniel Silva's Gabriel Allon is an art restorer. He's also an assassin. John Sandford's Kidd is an artist and computer expert, and a thief. I'd say those are hooks too. So hooks can work both ways. It depends on your style. Gee, I prefer assassins over knitters. What does that say about me?
ReplyDeleteIf the hobby/hook can play a part in solving the crime, I'm okay with it. ("No, no--the killer is no knitter. You'd never use that sort of knitting needle with that yarn," she says of the needle sticking out of the victim's chest.) I think it comes down to the writing. If it's good and entertaining, I'd be okay with it.
ReplyDeleteThis was such a great post. Gypsy Rose Lee actually wrote a couple of pulp fiction mysteries as well. The one I read was "The GString Murders" and yes, she had a gimmick there as well. Keep up the great work!
ReplyDelete