Showing posts with label Writing about death. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Writing about death. Show all posts

Saturday, January 31, 2015

My Name is Kait--by Kait Carson


Hi, my name is Kait. You and I have met before; I’m a writer who kills. You’ve had me as a guest a couple of times in fact, but this is my first meeting, such as it is, as a regular blogger on Writers Who Kill. I can see y’all sipping down your coffee, and a couple of you, tasting something stronger. We don’t have those rules here. You can drink what you like, long as you know who you are and what you do. Heck, you could probably light up a smoke or two. Might even help the atmosphere.

Ok, enough. I need to get down to it, I guess. I mean, you didn’t come here to listen to me wander all over the Southeast and points north. Fine.

Here’s the skinny on me. I’ve been writing since I could hold a pen. Nice, simple, stories, you know the kind. The house with the door and four windows in the front, the mommy and daddy, the brother to go with me. One face in every window. The true American Dream. Car in the garage, rose bushes alongside the steps. Regular stuff. I liked it. I liked that other people liked it. I really liked that the teacher liked it, and I got high praise for my efforts.

When you’re a kid like that, you think it’s never gonna change. No one is ever gonna look under the cover, flip the drawing over, see the inside. But that kid. She knows. She knows how many knots you need to tie into the sheet to get out the bedroom window. How Daddy is funny with one drink, a laugh a second with two, and someone you never met with three. All that while Mommy stands back and says, “He’s your father, do what he says.”

That’s when you want that family of four to look just like you, ‘cause if they don’t, there’s no place left for you to go. No place but down, and that’s where you’re going.

By third grade, you stop drawing that family. Those teachers, they’re smart. They figure you know your own house enough now. They don’t need to know what really happens. But they teach you something better. Something way better than drawing circles for Mommy and Daddy faces. They teach you to write. And they teach you about fiction. Pretty soon, you’re bringing home gold stars on your papers. Your teachers praise your creativity. Your parents put them up on the refrigerator. You’re going to be a writer.

For a while, you read every book you can get your hands on. Phyllis Whitney, Edgar Allan Poe, Louisa May Alcott. Everything. Nothing is immune from your reading need. You start to incorporate details from each of your heroes in your books. Suddenly, your teachers aren’t talking about classwork, they’re talking about careers. You and your career. You are a cut above. That’s rich. A cut above. If only they knew.

It’s about this time that some teacher hands you the book that changes your life. Some old guy named Antoine de Saint-Exupery wrote something called The Little Prince. It’s a short book, you read it twice before dinner. It was there that I learned to judge by deeds not words. That words are the source of problems and to love something, it must be let go.

That’s when I became a writer who killed. All of my prior stories were stories of my perception. I wrote what I saw. There was always a happy ever after. But after I learned that words were the source of all problems and deeds their resolution, well, I discovered that one must look deeper. Deeper than words. Some characters by their acts need killin’. And so, I’m a writer who kills. I look at the story world, and I listen to my characters, right and wrong, clear-eyed and self-deluded. Then I ask myself. How to help them write their own real stories?

What about you? What’s your criteria for a bad guy? Bad through and through or merely someone who through twists and turns, maybe jealousy and envy, becomes irredeemable?
You can reach Kait Carson at Facebook www.facebook.com/kait.carson.1, @twitter, or at www.kaitcarson.com. Her books are available at bookstores everywhere and at http://amzn.to/1IZvImt

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Of Writing and Murder and Being Considered Sane in Public




Let’s talk about murder for a second.

It’s the reason we’re all pretty much here, right, reading a blog called “Writers Who Kill”?

Because to write a mystery, you’ve got to bloody somebody’s fictional hands.

It’s just the way it goes. From Agatha to Stieg and every writer with a story in between, we’re all fictional murderers if we’re writing mystery. That’s just the way things are.

And therein lies a tiny little problem when I (and probably you) tell people what I write.

The conversation usually goes a little something like this.

“You’re a writer?”

“Yeah.”

“What do you write?”

“Outside of newspaper stuff? Mysteries.”

“Like with murder?”

“Yep.”

“Really? You seem so nice…”

The thing with writing mysteries is that folks think you secretly want to kill people.

Which isn’t true in the slightest.

Mystery writing isn’t about the murder.

It’s about finding the truth in the puzzle.

It’s about exposing the guilty, not glorifying what they’ve done.

Thus, when I discuss my manuscripts or potential manuscripts with people, I’m very lucky that my friends/critique partners/beta readers understand this very fine point. Because to talk about mystery ideas you first have to talk about murder.

Which, out of context, makes me (and you) sound completely insane.

In fact, I’ve had many a dinner or lunch meeting or writing date with writer friends where the discussion often veers into ideas on how to off someone in a book. What’s reasonable. What’s far-fetched but cool. What really fits into the storyline. Etc.

I just visited two of my writer friends in North Carolina, and fresh off the plane, my friend Renee shuttled me to a giant Whole Foods for lunch. As we chowed down on garlic-y kale in the store’s café, we discussed, probably a little too loudly, how I’d like to do a sort of fictionalized update of In Cold Blood.

Thus, there we sat, two bright-eyed chickadees chatting about bodies and blood spray in a farm house, a town on lockdown and the horror that comes from what seems like a completely random crime.

A couple of other folks were in the café, and I’m sure anyone listening in was mentally deciding whether he or she would get enough cell reception in a café bathroom to call the cops on us or if it would be best to just get up and walk out before the conversation got worse.

At least we gave those folks a really interesting Thursday afternoon.

Why do you gravitate toward writing mystery?

P.S.: The pic at the top is of a little guy my hubby bought me after I’d written my first in-the-drawer mystery. My special pencil holder has been terrifying coworkers and getting laughs ever since. And he’s the perfect metaphor, no?

Thursday, April 25, 2013

WRITING ABOUT DEATH







Recently I totaled up the many ways I’ve murdered victims in the three books and thirteen finished short stories I’ve written. Bashing on the head was the most common method with seven victims. Two of those were first bashed and then succumbed to eventual death through some other method like drowning or being run over by a sheepsfoot roller. Next was poisoning. I’ve poisoned five victims. Drowning was third.  Short stories for the Guppy anthologies needed something to do with water or fish nets. I wrote three for them, but one was too long so I couldn’t use it, but all three involved drowning. There were two involving strangulation. One murder happened with a garden fork and only one with a gun. Several more murders were caused deliberately, but the murderer couldn’t be prosecuted because one was a wife purposely feeding her obese diabetic husband a diet of rich and sweet fatty foods and another wife withheld important information from her husband.





So what kind of person plots and writes murder? Are we callous and unfeeling people for which death is no big deal? Or is writing about murders some subliminal wish to experience murdering someone through writing about it since we lack the courage to actually do such a deed? I don’t believe that’s true – at least not for me, and I doubt it is for other mystery writers either.



I for one have leaky tear ducts. I cry over sad movies or books. Except for slugs and Japanese beetles which I feed to my chickens, or mosquitoes and flies which I swat with no compunction, I can’t kill things. When Moggie, my cat, brings a mouse up from the basement, I leap from my chair to find a jar with a lid to rescue the mouse before she harms it and then I release it outside – where it most likely finds its way back in. I do the same if I see Barney, my barn cat with a chipmunk or a bird. I chase her around the yard until she drops her prey. The PBS News Hour used to show pictures and information of soldiers who had died in Iraq or Afghanistan several times a week at the end of their show. I sat there reading the information with eyes so wet I had a hard time reading. And so it was for me when my daughter called and told me what had happened at the Boston Marathon. She wanted to know if her Uncle Phillip – my youngest brother was there since he went every year. He wasn’t because he’d broken a bone in his foot the month before, but if not for the broken bone, he would have been running. I, who rarely watch TV, turned the set on and watched for over an hour. It wasn’t morbid interest, it was grief over what one or more bombers could callously do with no regard for innocent life.

Is it contradictory that I can write about death but am also saddened by it? Maybe, but I don’t write graphic death scenes and never kill off any characters that are fully developed and become real to me. It’s been said mystery writers want to make sense of a world in which much doesn’t make sense, exploring for example how there can be so much cruelty in the world. Also, I’m haunted by the face of the younger bomber. It’s a gentle face. Those who know him, family, teachers and friends, express shock and disbelief. They describe him as someone who was friendly, helpful, a good student, good at sports, and someone well-liked with many friends. How could he change so radically?  Did his older brother have some kind of control over him?
He certainly does not fit the same profile of other mass murderers we’ve read about.

Some would say would say there is more cruelty in the world today, but from reading about past eras, I don’t believe that. There’s much that has changed for the better. I couldn’t find the bombers and bring them to justice, and I can’t become a vigilante and bring about justice closer to home, either, but I can bring murderers on the page to justice; a microcosm of a real world, true, but at least in my written world justice rules in the end, and isn’t that what we all wish for?

Why do you write or read murder mysteries?