- Paula Gail Benson
- Connie Berry
- Sarah E. Burr
- Kait Carson
- Annette Dashofy
- E. B. Davis
- Mary Dutta
- Debra H. Goldstein
- Margaret S. Hamilton
- Lori Roberts Herbst
- James M. Jackson
- Marilyn Levinson aka Allison Brook
- Molly MacRae
- Lisa Malice
- Judy L. Murray
- Korina Moss
- Shari Randall/Meri Allen
- Linda Rodriguez
- Martha Reed
- Grace Topping
- Susan Van Kirk
- Heather Weidner
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Can you believe it? Unreliable Narrators by KM Rockwood
Few devices hook readers as effectively as the unreliable narrator. In crime fiction and psychological thrillers, this technique turns the act of reading into an investigation—forcing us to question not only what happened, but whether we can trust the person telling us the story. Often, the unreliable narrator is a likable, if confused, character who evokes empathy from readers.
What constitutes an unreliable narrator?
An unreliable narrator is the character who is telling the story, and whose credibility is compromised. This may stem from intentional deceit, psychological instability, memory gaps, or simple human fallibility. Humans are notoriously unreliable witnesses, even of their own stories. Maybe especially of their own stories. Those under emotional stress or when recounting dramatic events present what they see or think, not necessarily what is true. Add in possible mental illness, drug or alcohol use, and just plain denial, and the information which a character presents to the reader may be quite flawed.
How does an unreliable narrator support mystery and suspense fiction?
These genres thrive on uncertainty. When the narrator is biased, forgetful, unstable, or deceptive, every detail becomes suspect. This contributes to building suspense without artificial twists. It encourages characters to explore trauma, memory, and identity. Character traits are revealed through what’s omitted or distorted. The story unfolds, but how much of it can readers believe?
Once readers become aware that the narrator is unreliable, it challenges them to actively piece together the truth. The result can be a story that feels tense, intimate, and psychologically layered. Although the story can build toward the realization that the narrator is not presenting reality, that doubt is usually planted in the readers’ minds early.
Some popular examples of unreliable narrators
Margaret Atwood’s Alias Grace plays with ambiguity—Grace may be traumatized, manipulated, or simply lying. The novel’s tension comes from never fully knowing.
Alex Michaelides’ The Silent Patient features two layers of unreliability: Alicia’s silence and Theo’s increasingly questionable narration. The truth emerges only when both perspectives crack.
Paula Hawkins’ The Girl on the Train uses Rachel’s alcoholism and memory gaps to blur the line between witness and suspect. Her fragmented recollections become the mystery itself.
Gail Honeyman’s Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine presents Eleanor, who is in such deep denial about her traumatic past that the social worker who visits her regularly makes no attempt to disabuse her of her delusions.
Many of Margaret Yorke’s later novels are told from the point of view of an unreliable narrator.
Unreliable narrators don’t just hide information—they reshape the entire reading experience. By destabilizing our trust, they create stories that are immersive, unsettling, and impossible to put down. In crime fiction and psychological thrillers, that uncertainty isn’t a flaw. It’s the point.
Monday, January 12, 2026
Sarah Caudwell’s Thus Was Adonis Murdered
An Appreciation by Shari Randall
As you may have guessed from my blogs, I am a fan of classic mysteries. I’m not the only one. Did you catch the reference to John Dickson Carr’s classic locked-room mystery The Hollow Man in the new Knives Out: Wake Up Dead Man movie?
My latest foray into the classic mystery vault is Thus Was Adonis Murdered (1981) by Sarah Caudwell. Caudwell, whose real name was Sarah Cockburn, was a British barrister and law professor who was instrumental in opening the once exclusively male Oxford Union debating society to women. Her legal background and deep erudition are on display in the novel, but don’t let that scare you off. This is one entertaining read.
The plot? Young barrister Julia Larwood travels to Venice with a group called the Art Lovers. She sets her romantic sights on one of the group, and falls under suspicion when the young man is found murdered in their luxurious Venetian hotel. When her friends at the law office hear of her arrest, they work together to clear her name.
One would give one’s eye teeth to hang out with Caudwell’s characters, the witty and urbane denizens of Lincoln’s Inn Fields law office, and perhaps give even more to spend time in Venice with them. One feels one’s vocabulary and IQ score improve simply by turning the pages. One also finds oneself using “one” more than is wise or necessary in 2026.
But I digress. The investigation progresses through a series of letters that Julia sends to her friends back in London, an almost book-within-a-book effect that is utterly charming. Don’t we all love to read someone else’s mail? I couldn’t wait for another letter from Julia. Her entire aim during the trip is to seduce the Adonis of the title. (Not a spoiler; she makes the goal plain in her first letter.) Will Julia succeed? Don’t worry, much is left to the imagination, but still the frankness of Julia’s pursuit is amusing and refreshing.
Elegant, arch, mannered, acerbic, witty…I find myself losing track of the actual plot, distracted by the sheer style and voice of the narrator, Hilary Tamar, an Oxford don. In four books, Caudwell never reveals the sex or age of Tamar. She said in an interview with Mystery Scene magazine, “I knew from the outset Hilary must be an Oxford don – but of equivocal sex and even equivocal age, resembling that precise, donnish kind of individual who starts being elderly at the age of twenty-two.”
Those of us without a first in Classics will have our horizons broadened by allusions to Catullus, Michelangelo, and the Byzantine empire but, again, don’t let that scare you. If you’re looking for a book with rare style and wit, offering the sheer pleasure of immersing one’s self (sorry!) in the British TV fantasy world of dons, barristers, and Bermuda shorts-wearing army majors, this is the book for you.
SHARI RANDALL is the author of the Lobster Shack Mystery series, and, as Meri Allen, the Ice Cream Shop Mystery series. Her latest short story appears in the new Destination Murders anthology, Murder in the Graveyard.
Sunday, January 11, 2026
TO PROLOGUE OR NOT TO PROLOGUE
by Korina Moss
The choice of whether a book should begin with a prologue is often a heated debate. A prologue can be used for several reasons: to provide essential background information in order to set up the central conflict, as is often used in fantasy books; to provide a glimpse into the antagonist’s mind, sometimes used in thrillers; or to reveal information that the protagonist doesn’t yet know, sometimes used in suspense novels. Of course, there are other times one might use a prologue -- as with every “rule” in fiction writing, the reasons are not cut and dry. But should a prologue ever be used in a cozy mystery?
I’m never going to say never. However, the one reason not to use a prologue, which has come across my editing desk, is as a replacement for a slow first chapter. Some writers want to use it as a way to hook the reader with simply an exciting scene, knowing they've filled chapter one with backstory and introductions, and the plot train hasn’t left the station. Although you need to take time to introduce your main characters and set up the initial stakes and the discovery of a murder, this should be done while still moving the plot forward. A prologue can be used for many reasons, but it's not a substitute for keeping your readers entertained in chapter one.
Readers: Do you like prologues? Writers: Do you like to use them?
KORINA MOSS is the author of the Cheese Shop Mystery series, which includes the winner of the Agatha Award for Best First Novel, as well as two novels short-listed for Best Contemporary Novel. Listed as one of USA Today’s “Best Cozy Mystery Series,” her books have also been featured in PARADE Magazine, Woman’s World, and Writer’s Digest. Korina is also a freelance developmental editor specializing in cozy mysteries. To learn more or subscribe to her free monthly newsletter, visit her website korinamossauthor.com.Saturday, January 10, 2026
IT’S NOT SCIENCE FICTION: Jane Cleland’s New Book Inspires Writers of Today—and the Future—to Beat the AI Bots
By Lisa Malice, Ph.D.
Beat the Bots: A Writer’s
Guide to Surviving and Thriving in the Age of AI. It’s an intriguing title,
wouldn’t you say? This new book from Jane Cleland, the award-winning author of Mastering
Plot Twists and Mastering Suspense, Structure, & Plot, had me
wondering what amazing breakthrough she had made in tackling what many consider
as the existential threat to writers the world-over.
I poured through the book (as I
always do with Jane’s brilliant writing guides) and was excited to discover a simple,
elegant, and honest approach. One sure to inspire today’s writers, as it has me,
and those of generations yet to come as they strive to write the stories inside
them yearning to be told. The way to thrive in the age of AI is to capitalize
on what computers cannot be programmed to do—be creative.
“I believe, and this point cannot
be repeated enough, that we succeed as writers precisely because we are
human, not in spite of it,” notes Jane. “Bots are derivative, they can only
regurgitate, on a very superficial level, words that have been fed into their
memory.”
Indeed, Jane presses this point
throughout her book. “I asked chatbots to craft all manner of story elements—descriptions,
dialogue, character backstories, plots, even editing suggestions. The results
were laughable—clichéd, superficial, overwritten, missing the mark entirely in nearly
every case—in effect, showing that although AI could conceivably write a book,
it cannot craft a story that anyone would enjoy.”
And that, according to Jane, is
precisely why humans beat the bots each time. “As humans, we are creative, able
to draw on our lived experiences, our humanity, our ability to connect on an
emotional level with something inside us—our story—that resonates with readers.
Being a methodical gal, I decided to construct a step-by-step process for
writing that story, one that would harness writers’ creativity from idea
inception to revision, while also staying organized.”
The result? A masterpiece of a writer’s
toolkit—twelve chapters (divided into three sections) of tactics, techniques, roadmaps,
and exercises to cultivate the writer’s creative process. Part one, Find
Your Inner Voice, offers four tactics to spark writers’ imaginations from
searching for that story idea, exploring character motivations, plot points,
and immersive settings. Part two, Your Story, Your Voice, provides
strategies for making the most of point-of-view, artfully injecting backstory
into the work, crafting dialogue that advances the tale, and writing
thematically. Part three offers four tactics for Polishing for Perfection.
There is something for everyone
in this outstanding guide to creative writing, for beginning writers, as well
as authors of one bestselling book after another (ask them if they ever
struggle with their writing, they will say, “Yes!”). For me, as a recovering
debut author (feeling the weight of my first-book success on my
work-in-progress), I’m thrilled with Jane’s twelve-step creativity program. I
was tickled to learn I excel at some techniques, such as using Jane’s two-word
prompt (“What if . . .?”) for conceptualizing an initial story idea. For
me, a pantser, her “Mind-wandering” technique for exploring plot points will
help firm up my saggy second act.
One unique tool offered by Beat
the Bots that other craft books do not—a TikTok community for readers wherein
they can learn from others as they work through the book’s techniques and
exercises. “I decided to capitalize on the popularity of TikTok, hoping to
connect with writers I would not otherwise have any way to reach.”
The group is in its infancy, and Jane
is helping it along by recording her own responses to spur participation, but this
inspired tool for stimulating creativity hits the mark dead-on. I’m eager to
discover how these conversations, centered on sharing unique life experiences,
feelings, and perspectives will spark new, more diverse story ideas, plots,
characters, and settings inside my writer’s mind.
Get your copy of Beat the Bots
today and have a more creative tomorrow. As an added bonus, you’ll help restore
beautiful reefs. Jane’s publisher. Regalo Press, donates a portion of their
profits to their authors’ charity of choice. Jane and her husband, avid
snorkelers, chose Reef Renewal Foundation International, which incubates and transplants
coral for struggling reefs. Learn more at www.ReefRenewal.org.
Bio:
Jane K. Cleland has written fourteen novels in the multiple
award-winning Josie Prescott Antiques Mystery series. The series has been
optioned for TV/film development. Jane’s other nonfiction books, Mastering
Suspense, Structure & Plot and Mastering Plot Twists, both won
the Agatha Award. Jane is a contributing editor for Writer’s Digest Magazine
and the chair of the Black Orchid Novella Award, presented by the Wolfe Pack in
partnership with Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine. http://janecleland.com.
Friday, January 9, 2026
The Writers Who Kill Favorite 2025 Reads
By Heather Weidner
When we are not writing mysteries and thrillers, we are readers, too. Here are the Writers Who Kill 2025 favorite reads.
Fantasy
James Jackson: Snake-Eater by T. Kingfisher
James Jackson: Fourth Wing by Rebecca Yarros
Historical Fiction
Lori Roberts Herbst: This Tender Land by William Kent
Krueger
Susan Van Kirk: The Remains of the Day by Kazuo
Ishiguro
Mystery – Cozy
Sarah E. Burr: Trebled Waters by Leah Dobrinska
Heather Weidner: Basket Case by Nancy Haddock
Grace Topping: The Impossible Fortune by Richard
Osman
E. B. Davis: Coeds and Cattails by Jana DeLeon
Grace Topping: The French Paradox by Ellen Crosby
Heather Weidner: Vice and Virtue by Libby Klein
Grace Topping: Murder in Venice by T.A. Williams
Molly MacRae: Cat on the Edge by Shirley Rousseau
Murphy
E. B. Davis: The Violet Hour by Victoria
Benton Frank
Lori Roberts Herbst: How the Penguins Saved Veronica
by Hazel Prior
Susan Van Kirk: Villain in the Vineyard by Judy L.
Murray
Grace Topping: Murder on the Marlow Belle by Robert
Thorogood
Mary Dutta: Thursday Murder Club by Richard Osman
Molly MacRae: The Librarians by Sherry Thomas
Mystery – Historical
Marilyn Levinson and Susan Van Kirk: The Frozen River
by Ariel Lawhon
Judy L. Murray: A Beautiful Blue Death by Charles
Finch
Heather Weidner: Disco Dead by Marcia Talley
Judy L. Murray: The Blackout Murders by Anna Elliott
and Charles Veley
Mystery – Legal Thriller
Marilyn Levinson: The President’s Lawyer by Lawrence
Robbins
Heather Weidner: The Proving Ground by Michael
Connelly
Mystery – Thriller
Sarah E. Burr, Grace Topping, and Heather Weidner: Secret
of Secrets by Dan Brown
James Jackson: Blacktop Wasteland by S. A. Cosby
Heather Weidner: King of Ashes by S. A. Cosby
James Jackson: A Good Girl’s Guide to Murder by Holly
Jackson
Susan Van Kirk: The Sequel by Jean Korelitz
Annette Dashofy: We Are All Guilty Here by Karin
Slaughter
Mystery – Traditional
Lori Roberts Herbst: The Maid’s Secret by Nita Prose
Susan Van Kirk: Apostles Cove by William Kent
Krueger
Grace Topping: The World‘s Greatest Detective and Her
Just Okay Assistant by Liza Tully
Heather Weidner: The Black Wolf by Louise Penny
Shari Randall: The Three Coffins (UK title: The
Hollow Man, 1935) by John Dickson
Annette Dashofy: At Midnight Comes the Cry by Julia
Spencer-Fleming
Grace Topping: A Grave Deception by Connie Berry
Mystery – Police Procedural
Martha Reed: The
Silent Trumpet by Bill Gormley
E. B Davis:
Gray Dawn by Walter Mosley
James Jackson: The Waiting by Michael Connelly
Grace Topping: Niki Unleashed by James M. Jackson
Mystery –
Young Adult
James Jackson: The
Inheritance Game by Jennifer Lynn Barnes
James Jackson: The
Hawthorne Legacy by Jennifer Lynn Barnes
James Jackson: The
Lying Woods by Ashley Elston
Nonfiction
Debra H. Goldstein: Heart of a Stranger by Angela
Buchdahl
Heather Weidner: Heaven Help Us: How Faith Communities
Inspire Hope, Strengthen Neighbors, and Build the Future by John Kasich
Molly MacRae: Joyride by Susan Orlean
Susan Van Kirk: You Never Know by Tom Selleck
Molly MacRae: Cokie: A Life Well Lived by Steven V.
Roberts
Poetry
Susan Van Kirk: A Thousand Mornings by Mary Oliver
Science Fiction
Lori Roberts Herbst: Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir
Women’s Fiction
Kait Carson: The Women by Kristin Hannah
Lori Roberts Herbst: How to Age Disgracefully by
Clare Pooley
What were your favorite reads from last year?
Through
the years, Heather Weidner has been a cop’s kid, technical writer, editor,
college professor, software tester, and IT manager. She writes the Pearly Girls
Mysteries, the Delanie Fitzgerald Mysteries, The Jules Keene Glamping
Mysteries, and The Mermaid Bay Christmas Shoppe Mysteries. She blogs regularly
with the Writers Who Kill.
Her
short stories appear in a variety of anthologies, and she has non-fiction pieces in Promophobia and The Secret Ingredient: A Mystery Writers’
Cookbook.
Originally
from Virginia Beach, Heather has been a mystery fan since Scooby-Doo and Nancy
Drew. She lives in Central Virginia with her husband and a crazy Mini Aussie
Shepherd.
Thursday, January 8, 2026
JAMES SCOTT BELL'S FORCE OF HABIT: THE COMPLETE SERIES
By Margaret S.
Hamilton
“Sister Justicia Marie thought it was going to be a
beautiful day in LA, full of mercy and grace, until she had to break a man’s
finger at lunch.”
Meet Sister J, founding member of the Sisters of Perpetual
Justice and their homeless shelter in Los Angeles. In her pre-convent life,
Sister J was the child actress Brooke Bailey. As a young adult, Brooke studied
Krav Maga and other martial arts in preparation for her movie roles. After she
was fired while filming her last movie, she found God in a shaft of sunlight on
the Santa Monica clifftops overlooking the Pacific Coast Highway.
Sister J drives
a 10 year old Saturn, indulges in Fritos and Coca Cola, and uses Ave Maria
as her cell phone ring tone. I suspect she’s in her mid-thirties.
The series is comprised of six novelettes, each about fifteen thousand words. Sister J leaves her elementary school teaching career to found a much-needed homeless shelter in a seedy area of Los Angeles. Each novelette addresses a crime that has been committed, and Sister J’s use of force to restore justice. The novelettes are “skinny” and remind me of graphic novels or thirty-minute TV shows plots.
Sister J flaunts her disrespect for her Mother Superior and
Bishop but attends confession regularly and embraces the teachings of the
Church. She feeds the hungry, houses the homeless, and rescues lost souls on a
regular basis. My favorite lost soul is a teenager boy she catches painting
graffiti on her shelter building. Instead of turning him over to the police,
she hires him to paint a mural of Jesus stilling the waters.
The novelettes are delightful, each as crisp as one potato
chip, leaving the reader craving more. Sister J routinely deals with lowlife
gangsters, drug dealers, and a nightclub magician, using “harm for good” as she
stops criminals committing heinous crimes.
James Scott Bell notes that his son gave him the idea of a
vigilante nun and the title for the series. He wrote the novelettes in between
writing other, longer, works.
Readers and Writers, does the idea of a vigilante nun appeal
to you?
Margaret S. Hamilton writes the Jericho Mysteries series and
has published forty mystery short stories.
Home - The Official
Website of Margaret S. Hamilton
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
An Interview with Annette Dashofy by E.B. Davis
When a local Erie vet is shot during a robbery, Erie City Police
Detective Matthias Honeywell and his partner Cassie Malone are tasked with
pursuing the perpetrators. But as they close in on the truth, a mysterious
sniper targets those involved in the case.
Emma Anderson has seen more than her share of cases since becoming
a journalist in Lake Erie, and with news of the shooting becoming local
interest, her instincts kick in. What she didn’t expect to uncover was a secret
that could cause an ethical dilemma between Matthias and Cassie.
As the search for the sniper continues and the investigation
taking a dark turn, Cassie and Emma find themselves caught up in a kidnapping
plot. As the women are forced to draw on their resourcefulness to survive, will
they manage to escape or is time against them?
What’s the sign of a great series? Wondering what happens next to the characters after you turn the last page. In No Stone Left Unturned, Annette Dashofy writes suspense in every page. Luckily for us, the book is now on Kindle Unlimited.
In the first three
books in the Detective Matthias Honeywell mystery series, I’ve grown to love
Honeywell’s partner, Cassie Malone, who is his senior, a black, female
grandmother, which may make her one of the deadliest creatures on earth.
Unfortunately, in No Stone Left Unturned, her family becomes the main
focus when her veterinarian husband is shot in the chest for no apparent
reason. It’s up to Matthias and Emma to solve the mystery as Cassie is
sidelined from participating in the case.
Do yourselves a favor
and download this book. It’s suspense at its finest. You care about the
characters, who find themselves in a downhill avalanche trying to stay alive.
E. B. Davis
Aw,
thanks, E.B!
I forget. How did
Matthias get from Oklahoma, where he was raised, to Erie?
When
he was a young cop, he fell in love with a woman from Erie and followed her
there when she moved home. However, when he proposed marriage, she turned him
down and married an attorney instead. She and her new husband returned to
Oklahoma. A heartbroken Matthias stayed in Erie and has been there ever since.
Emma is at the crime
scene outside of Shawn’s veterinary clinic after the police have been notified.
As a newbie photojournalist, why is she uncomfortable in her job?
Emma
never wanted a career in photojournalism because she feels it’s intrusive,
taking pictures of people on their worst days. However, she has this “fantasy”
of being at crime scenes, working with Matthias. I put that in quotes because
she realizes it isn’t going to happen. If anything, it puts them at odds.
Shawn and Cassie are
fiercely loyal to Shawn’s employees, as they are to him. How does Cassie react
when he questions her about them?
Cassie’s
defensive because Shawn trusts his employees like family. On the other hand, as
a cop, she knows Matthias is only doing his job, and his questions raise
concerns of her own.
Shawn Malone, Cassie’s husband, is known for his kindness, especially when it comes to treating pets who have low-income owners. Because of this policy, when his office manager, Bethany, accepts a last-minute appointment with a man who can’t afford his dog’s care, it’s treated as routine. But before the conclusion of the appointment, three masked men raid the office for drugs and cash, and then shoot Shawn in the chest. Why does Matthias suspect that Bethany may have been in on the attack on Shawn?
Since
the men gain access through a side door that’s locked to the outside, and since
Bethany had just let the dog and its owner through those same doors, she’s
immediately suspect. How else could those gunmen have gotten in unless she’d
left the door unlocked for them?
Finding a motive for
the shooting is the hardest part of the case. No one disliked Shawn. The
detectives on the case, Matthias, and his underlings, Frazier and Roth, wonder
if it is Cassie that the shooter was trying to hurt. Why do they eliminate that
motive?
Cassie
doesn’t recognize any of the gunmen, although since they’re masked, it’s
difficult for her to be 100% certain. Once the police identify them, though,
she’s positive she’s not encountered them in any of her past investigations.
And the Erie police can’t find any connections to Cassie, either.
Why is Emma’s friend,
Eric Baker, who lives in their hometown in Southwestern PA, so interested for
Emma to sell the land that Emma and her younger sister, Nell, have inherited?
Does he get a commission? Shouldn’t he know she can’t approve the sale without
her sister’s consent?
There’s
more going on there than meets the eye. Emma did leave the care of her property
in Eric’s hands, so it’s logical that any offers would come through him, and he
definitely knows that Nell’s consent is necessary to sell the land. As to why
he’s being such a pain about it, you’ll have to wait for the next book!
Emma has to make a
decision about her living arrangements. It’s August and the campground where
she is living in a mobile home will close in October. What is she
contemplating?
It’s
not a mobile home; it’s a 17-foot camper with no insulation, so even if the
campground stayed open, she couldn’t survive an Erie winter in her current
residence. She doesn’t really have plans, although she needs to give serious
thought to the situation. The idea that Matthias might invite her to move in
with him is appealing, but she’s afraid too much togetherness might sink their fledgling
relationship. A lot of Erie homeowners winter over in southern locales and rent
out their northern homes for the season. That feels like a better option, but
Emma doesn’t have the time or inclination to give it a lot of thought right
now.
Because Matthias is
busy trying to solve the case, he relies on Emma to give Cassie friendship and
company while Shawn is in and out of the operating room. Emma is put into a
dual role. She’s on the inside of a journalist’s story and yet, because the two
couples socialize, she’s also a casual friend. How does Emma resolve the two?
Emma
tries her best to avoid being put in the position of spy, but her loyalties are
sorely tested! We are talking about Cassie Malone, after all, and Cassie is a
force of nature, so when she demands details of the case, Emma can’t really say
no.
After Cassie talks to Shawn once he is stable, Shawn tells Cassie about the shooter. They conclude it was a racially motivated attack, but as it turns out, it was not. Is this an emotional response? Do people overcompensate by blaming what is convenient rather than looking at the facts?
It’s
a logical assumption for them to reach, and it goes beyond emotions. They’ve
experienced racism all their lives. It would be naïve to ignore the possibility
in this case.
Among the things on
Matthias’s mind while trying to solve the case is his relationship with Emma.
He’s afraid she will leave Erie after her lease is up at the campground. What
is the basis of his fear?
Matthias
and Emma definitely have communication issues! From his perspective, he’s not
had a lot of luck with women. He’s only been in love twice and both times, it
ended badly. He built walls around his heart, and it’s been ages since he let
someone get close. Now that he has feelings for Emma, he worries he’s going to
lose her, too.
With one of the
clinic’s suspected attackers found dead, they go after the second suspect who
enters a warehouse area. While investigating, a sniper opens fire from an upper
window. Unknowingly, Emma and her journalist partner enter the scene where Emma
finds herself pinned down by the shots. Why doesn’t she dive for cover? Why
does she hold the button on her camera down for automatic and continuous
picture taking?
You
get totally focused on that viewfinder and lose sense of what’s really going
on. It happened to me. Well, not getting shot at, but I was photographing a
wild coyote that was posing beautifully for me! I was so intent on getting the
shot, I didn’t comprehend how close the coyote was getting until my husband
shouted at me. I looked up from the viewfinder to realize it was very
close! As for keeping the shutter depressed, when you’re dealing with action,
you don’t try to compose the photo. You simply keep firing. If you’re lucky,
when you go through a thousand images, you’ll find that one perfect shot.
When Emma allows Matthias to have a copy of her photos, she gets reprimanded by her boss at the online newspaper. Why? And what is Emma’s reaction?
The
memory card Emma turned over to Matthias is property of ErieLIVE. The police
may need those original source files when the case goes to trial, so they give
her a copy to take back to the news outlet. But Emma’s boss sees it as a
breach. Journalists don’t cater to the police, at least not without approval
from management. Since Matthias saved her life, Emma doesn’t feel she could
turn him down on the matter. It’s another case of Emma’s loyalties coming into
question.
Why do guns and
cameras have a lot of the same terminology?
I
honestly don’t know. You aim both. You shoot pictures. Weapons obviously came
first, but I’ve always found it interesting that photography stole so much of
the terminology.
When investigating,
secrets are revealed. But when the subjects of the case are friends, it is
especially difficult to ask questions about them. Both Matthias and Emma dig up
secrets of Shawn’s and those close to him. What is so hard about revealing the
truth?
Some
secrets are kept hidden to avoid re-opening old injuries. Haven’t we all made
youthful indiscretions that we prefer stayed buried?
You chose to set your
novel in the heat of August, which made for great January reading by your
freezing audience. But as the motive turned out to be revenge, I question if
you flaunt the quote about revenge being a dish served cold?
It
wasn’t intentional. It takes the biggest part of a year to write a book, and I
have no control over when it gets released. Believe me, having a mid-winter
launch in snowy Pennsylvania would not have been my first choice!
Emma needs to go home
and asks Matthias to accompany her. What’s next for them?
The
fifth Honeywell mystery picks up right where this one leaves off, with Matthias
and Emma headed back to her hometown to deal with Eric, Nell, and the land
situation. Watch for it in September!













