Sunday, March 26, 2017

Remembering Pearl Harbor

War is caused either by an imperialistic stance by an aggressor, a failure of nations to successfully negotiate their differences, or a combination of the two, which is how the United States ended up in World War Two.

When Japan invaded Manchuria (imperialism), the United States reacted by refusing to sell Japan oil. This was no small matter for Japan, who bought 80% of its oil from U.S. companies. When the terms the U.S. required to begin shipping oil to Japan were too high for the Japanese government to accept and still maintain face—a commodity more important to politicians than to the millions of regular people who suffer when nations resort to war—Japan attacked the U.S. at Pearl Harbor on a date that FDR decried would live in infamy.

In two hours, Japan sank most of our battleships, numerous other vessels, and killed 2,400 people. As battles go, the material losses were major (although temporary, as most of the battleships were raised to fight again). In comparison to other battles, the human loss was small. On a single day at the battle of Antietam (Sharpsburg, MD) nearly 23,000 soldiers died. The atomic bomb dropped at Hiroshima killed over 40,000 people that day and 50,000 -100,000 more in the next four months.

I know all those statistics, but what resonated most with me as I toured Pearl Harbor, part of the World War II Valor in the Pacific National Monument (including the USS Arizona memorial), is the virulent hate so many immediately felt toward those of Japanese heritage living in the United States. In Executive Order 9066, FDR set in motion what would become the mass internment of Americans with Japanese ancestry. In the mainland U.S., over 100,000 were interned. In Hawaii, with a population of over 150,000 individuals with Japanese ancestry, fewer than 2,000 were interned!

Did you know the disparity of treatment of between locations? I did not. This was racism, pure and simple.

Fear allows presidents to take actions that would otherwise be unconstitutional. FDR subjected citizens of Japanese ancestry to the loss of property, freedom, all citizen rights, simply because of fear that they might conspire against their country.

President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus soon after the start of the hostilities now referred to as the Civil War, the War Between the States, or the War of Northern Aggression. The Judiciary determined that the right to suspend habeas corpus resided in Congress, not the President. Lincoln ignored the court order.

Lincoln was wrong to ignore the courts. FDR was wrong to tar all those with Japanese heritage with a single brush. Yet, in surveys, Lincoln and Roosevelt are considered two of our greatest presidents. For example, in the Siena College Research Institute, Presidential Expert Poll of 2010, Lincoln was rated #3, FDR was #1[1].

During the McCarthy era, political persuasion (and sometimes only presumed political persuasion) was cause for citizens to lose their jobs, to be blacklisted by industries regardless of whether they had ever committed any act against the interests of the United States.

This is our past. We should not run away from it. We must remember it to avoid repeating it.

We feared Native Americans and tried to exterminate them, or at least confine them to reservations. We feared Southern sympathizers and allowed presidential power to trump the checks and balances of our three branches of government. We feared the Japanese and illegally interred 100,000 fellow Americans.

Our current president uses fear of race, religion, and national origin to pit U.S. citizen against U.S. citizen. In our society, I am lucky to be privileged: an Anglo-Saxon male with sufficient financial means that I don’t need to rely upon charity to live. From the perspective of those in power, I should be concerned about losing all that I value because of the growing influence of those who are “not our kind.”

They are correct that I am concerned about losing what I most value. However, we have very different concepts about what has greatest value.

If I do not stand with Muslims and Jews and Blacks and Mexicans, if I do not stand with the poor regardless of race or religion; if I don’t object when others’ rights are diminished in response to fear promulgated for political gain; if I allow anyone to trample the inherent worth and dignity of another, I have lost my own soul.

~ Jim



[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States#Siena_College_Research_Institute.2C_Presidential_Expert_Poll_of_2010

8 comments:

  1. Thank you for explaining so clearly and succinctly why "e pluribus unum" is an American value, and why we must continue to fight for it, learn from our mistakes, and vow to do better (and every day there are opportunities to do better). We are all in this American experiment together. May we never forget what that means.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a Lincoln buff I have to respond. Lincoln said he was acting under the part of the constitution that allowed extra power to the President in time of rebellion. The Supreme Court made the worst decision in its history ruling that a black man could never be a citizen and had no rights a white person needed to pay attention to. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say the court would have made winning the Civl War much much more difficult.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well said, Jim! Such important things for us to reflect on in our present political climate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”

    Martin Niemoller, German Lutheran pastor (There are several variations of this, both in translation and the original. Pastor Neimoller expressed this thought numerous times, often in slightly different terms.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jim, what an excellent blog that I totally agree with. I'm totally aware of the history of our country that hasn't been the perfect country so many people believed it was. Throughout the years there has always been prejudice of others who aren't exactly like whatever color or nationality they are. I hate to see it still happening, and it seems to be getting worse instead of better. Thanks for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wonderful. During the past eighteen months we've reviewed or learned much about how and why our government was set up, and our past mistakes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks all.

    Warren -- I don't agree with all Supreme Court decisions, but I do believe they were correct when they said only Congress could suspend the writ of habeas corpus. And, I do not think it is well for presidents to unilaterally reject the judicial part of our three branches of government just because it seems convenient at the time. Two years later, Congress passed a law that did what Lincoln wanted. If it were a crisis they could have done it in 1861.

    Aloha,
    ~ Jim

    ReplyDelete
  8. Amazing post. Specially the last few lines are amazing and i second you on that, dear author. Its not about your religion, its about humanity.

    ReplyDelete