Thanks for your questions about my
blog on writing a 50-word bio. It
was first posted in 2012. A link
below will let anyone read the original blog.
I wrote it for people who had a
story accepted for publication in an anthology and who wanted to know more
about writing a short biography to accompany their story. I’m happy to expand on what I wrote
back then.
The first rule is there are no
absolute rules. As the author you
can do anything you want to do. On
the other hand, some choices make it more likely you will get published and
others make it less likely.
Generally, a request for a biography
is a request for information about the author, not about the submission. I’ve been an editor and a writing
contest judge. Nobody who sent
information I did not want without information I asked for, got published or won
a prize. That was not from
ignoring one of the directions. In
my experience, people who disregarded one guideline also ignored other
instructions. The combination eliminated
their work from serious consideration.
As a judge and editor I always had more submissions than space to publish
all of them. Authors who
eliminated themselves from consideration made my job easier.
I don’t want to sound too
negative. As an editor, I was
always excited to read well-written submissions from an author I had not worked
with before. Editors are looking for work to include in their venues.
As a writer, I understand your
desire to give more information about your story. I have often heard people at critique groups who wanted to
talk about their work before handing out copies. My response is always, “I don’t want to hear it.” We writers
only have the words on the page to convey a story. We don’t have music to prepare the mood. We don’t have “freeze frames” to let
the audience know who is important.
We don’t have actresses and actors who can say one thing while engaging
in activities that contradict their words. We only have words on the page. The work stands alone.
By the way most attempts at non-standard language do not work.
I think it’s great that you have
more ideas about the setting and characters in your story. If your story needs other information
beyond what you have written, the information should be included in your story
when you re-write it and your story, as is, is not yet ready to submit. If your story is complete and you have
additional information, you might be able to include the information in more
stories with or without your main character. Having a setting or character you know well is a tremendous
asset for your career.
Ambitious, if you don’t have
publications to refer to in a bio, you can give information about what you have
done to prepare for a writing career.
Have you taken classes or attended workshops about writing? Are you a member of a critique group or
writing group like Sisters in Crime or Guppies? Anything you’ve done with a school yearbook or newsletter
would be worth mentioning. If you
haven’t done those things, you might consider starting one or more. I like your ambition and determination.
I believe a publisher would too.
I hope that’s helpful.
Wonderful of you, Warren, to take the time to address one reader's concerns. "Ambitious" is a young woman who would like to become a writer, just like all of us when we first realized we wanted careers as writers. Good advise!
ReplyDeleteI remember receiving a rejection to a literary magazine prior to earning any writing credits. About my biography (in which I had provided way too much information) one reviewer for the magazine commented to the effect that anything much more than my name and where I lived was superfluous.
ReplyDeleteA bit harsh, but it did make the point. I now have standard 50, 75 & 100-word bios on my computer that I update as the occasion needs.
~ Jim
Some publications want bios sent with the submission while others consider it superfluous.
ReplyDeleteThe important thing is to follow the guidelines. Also, gear your bio to the writing area that the pub represents.
Warren, back in my early days of after my first book was finished, I sent out queries to various agents and publishers and if I heard from any of them, I got a rejection. This was in the days before I discovered Sinc or the Guppies. I hate to think of how amateurish those early queries were. I certainly didn't have any writing publications to mention outside of one short story that had won a contest.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. For five years I read submissions for The Larcom Review and The Larcom Press, and it was easy to spot the professionals from the wannabes and beginners. I had begun with the assumption that some things were apocryphal but wannabes really did tell me that their friends loved their story and I would too if I had any taste. Some of the cover and query letters were hilarious and I soon read them hoping for a good laugh. The stories we selected almost always came with no or very short cover letters. And the writers always followed the submission guidelines.
ReplyDeleteI struggle with requested bios--I have two requests, right now, for short stories that have been accepted for publication. What have I ever done that's interesting enough for people I don't know to want to read? I've fallen back on pretty much supplying the one I have on my author page on Amazon. And I don't supply personal information unless it's requested--I'd rather have the attention on the work than on me.
ReplyDeleteGreat advice. Thank you, Warren.
ReplyDelete