This blog promotes my writing and exercises my writing
skills outside of fiction. It also has enabled me to interview many authors. In
my first year of writing for this blog, I learned that I needed to read the
books of those I interview. It’s time consuming. When I hadn’t read the authors’
books, I focused the interview so that I didn’t give my opinion of their books. The problem with that, of course,
is that by interviewing an author, the interview itself becomes an endorsement.
So I made a rule not to interview anyone whose work I hadn’t read. I’ve also
reviewed books on this blog that I’ve read and loved regardless of interviewing
the author. In short, I try to promote good writers and good books here.
When I’m not writing, revising my own work or doing “real”
work, I read—a lot. It goes with the territory of being a writer. That’s where
my writing started—by reading other writers work. Since I got a Kindle, I beg
Amazon gift cards when asked what I want
for
presents (we’re the practical sort). I’ve downloaded the work of authors I know
and don’t know. In hardcopy, I usually try new authors at the library before
buying their work. But “in these times of municipal-fiscal austerity” my
library doesn’t carry many new authors. So, I have downloaded works that I
sometimes love (and interview the author, such as in the case of Ellen
Elizabeth Hunter) or wish I hadn’t downloaded, reconciling my expense as a
gamble.
What I haven’t done, and feel guilty by my lacking, is
providing reviews of books I’ve read online. Time is an issue for me, but it is
for other writers as well, so that doesn’t pardon my lapse. Online reviews help
sell books and further the careers of new authors. On venues such as Amazon,
reviews can make or break a book. I admit that when a book on Amazon has five
stars behind it and many reviews have averaged that five star rating, I’m
inclined to buy the book. When a book only has two stars, I don’t hit the buy
button unless I know the author or the rating comprises one review—then I think
about it.
I’ve made a new rule for myself. I won’t write a bad review.
Withholding my negative opinion will decrease the amount of reviews a book
receives
and that in and of itself negatively impacts sales. But—because I haven’t
provided online reviews for books that I’ve loved—I’ve inadvertently and negatively
impacted the book and the author’s career producing bad karma for myself.
I hope that exposing readers here to new authors and that writing reviews online for other new writers—they in turn will take the time to do the same for me. My blogging hasn’t been intentionally to get just as much as I receive because it all depends on whether or not I deliver a good product worth reading. But if I can write a worthwhile entertaining novel, then I fully hope my good intentions will motivate and deserve others’ time to do the same for me.
Have you written an online review for a new author today? If
not, get cracking!
Elaine, as one who has benefited from your support, I say hear, hear! You were the first person to host my alter ego, and you've been supportive of my work both on your blog and personally. I know authors who have said in other venues that they loved one of my books, but they didn't write a review. As an author, they should know how important a good review is, so I don't understand their reluctance to write one. I try to give either a four or five star review to new authors, or I don't give any. But if a book is good, I feel it's our duty to share the information.
ReplyDeleteIt is hard for new authors to get reviewed by real book reviewers so providing reviews of good new books is important. Like anything, if a book becomes popular, then it garners all the traditional reviews, but it has to get a little grassroot support before that can happen.
ReplyDeleteI'm really busy. It seems as if at any given time, I am juggling three tasks. But--reviewing books for Goodreads, libraries and online at selling venues such as Amazon is too important to put off.
I will try to compose at least two small reviews per week from now on.
I am one of those "new authors" with only a few reviews. Although I have some really good reviews as blurbs for my books and on websites, reviewers often don't also post in more than one place so Goodreads and Amazon doesn't include all my reviews.
ReplyDeleteIn my reviews and interviews I try to focus on positive aspects of the writing.
EB, thanks for writing about this. I wasn't aware how important these online reviews at Goodreads, Amazon, and Barnes & Noble were until recently. I have had so many people email or write in comments here and elsewhere that they loved EVERY LAST SECRET--and I'm delighted!--but they don't write even the shortest review on one of those big three online sites. Meanwhile, someone on Goodreads who says in her review that she read hardly any of the book (because she didn't like the character's name!) blasts it in a review with one star. *sigh*
ReplyDeleteLinda I got a two star review on Goodreads from a woman who made positive comments about my writing and dialog. She said she thought the title of Murder Manhattan Style was "misleading" because the book did not describe the Manhattan she imagined it would based on the title. If you're not supposed to judge a book by its cover, should you judge it by its title?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your review of my book.
Polly, Warren and Linda--my apologies. I've read most of your books and have failed to post online reviews. Perhaps I should just list all the authors that I need to apologise to (although I doubt that I'll remember everyone.
ReplyDeletePolly Iyer
Warren Bull
Linda Rodrigues
Ellis Vidler
Kelly Cochran
Peg Cochran
Kait Carson
Edie Claire
Michele Drier
Lesley Diehl
Jana DeLeon
Paula DuMond
Kate George
Kaye George
Sasscer Hill
Cathryn Grant
Marilyn Levinson
Elaine Orr
Wow! I have a lot of online reviews to write--I will--I promise!
EB, since I learned of the importance of this, I've been going through writing a review a day for books and authors I've read and loved. My list is much longer than yours, so don't feel bad! We just do what we can.
ReplyDeleteWarren, at least she READ your book! This person thought Skeet's name was stupid, so she shut the book and wrote a review.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your support, as well.
I hadn't thought about blogging in the light of grassroots support for books, but it's a logical conclusion. Thanks for the nudge.
ReplyDeleteWe have to support each other, Valerie. Most often the first readers are other writers, so if we review the books online, it will help other readers buy books. Isn't selling and developing a good reputation what we seek?
ReplyDeleteLinda and Warren--one reviewer won't make or break your books. "Skeet" is a cute name, Linda, and I found the duality of your Manhattans refreshing Warren. And there is a Philadelphia, Mississippi. So why not two Manhattans?
As long as we are apologizing, I have to apologize for not thanking Kim Williams for her review. Thank you. Kim.
ReplyDeleteI love the name "Skeet" and she's a great character.