Showing posts with label Terrie Farley Moran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Terrie Farley Moran. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

An Interview With Terrie Farley Moran

By Grace Topping

 

One of the absolutely best things about being a member of the mystery writing community is seeing members of the community succeed. Watching author Terrie Farley Moran gain accolades for her short stories and win an Agatha Award for her first novel was exciting. But learning that she is to be the new voice for the much-loved Murder, She Wrote series is beyond thrilling. Murder She Wrote: Killing in a Koi Pond, which will be released on June 8, 2021, is Terrie’s first entry into the Murder, She Wrote world. Terrie joins us at Writers Who Kill to talk about this new direction in her writing career. 

 

Murder She Wrote: Killing in a Koi Pond

Back Cover Copy

 


When a friend’s husband dies while Jessica Fletcher is in town visiting, Jessica’s vacation turns into a murder investigation in this latest entry in the long-running USA Today bestselling series.


After traveling to Bethesda for a mystery writers’ conference, Jessica Fletcher decides she’s earned a vacation and takes a train to Columbia, South Carolina, to visit her old college friend Dolores, who has recently married her third husband, Willis Nickens, a wealthy and cutthroat businessman. They’ve moved into an opulent historic home with plenty of space for guests, and Jessica is ready for a week of shopping, gossiping, and relaxing at the grand estate.

But the morning after she arrives, Jessica discovers Willis facedown in the koi pond, and despite what the police think, she’s sure foul play is involved. She hadn’t known Willis long, but it’s clear to her that he didn’t concern himself with making friends. The question isn’t if her friend’s husband was murdered but by whom.

                                                                                                www.amazon.com

 

 

Welcome back to Writers Who Kill, Terrie.

 

Hi, Grace. It’s terrific to be here again.

 

First of all, a hearty congratulations on joining Jessica Fletcher and becoming the new co-writer of the Murder, She Wrote series. That was quite an accomplishment. Can you please tell us how that came about? 

 


At the beginning of the pandemic quarantine, St. Patrick’s Day 2020, while I was dancing to Irish music, baking soda bread and bemoaning that there were no parades, my agent called and asked if I would be interested in writing the next few books in the Murder, She Wrote series. Before she could even outline the details of the project, I shouted a resounding “YES.” I have no idea how the offer came about. I may have been the first writer approached or the fortieth. My best guess is that I had been writing for a number of years under the Berkley imprint. The editorial staff is extremely familiar with my work, and I presume they thought my writing style would be a good fit for Murder, She Wrote. I will be forever grateful for this opportunity to write about my favorite amateur sleuth, Jessica Fletcher.

 

What was the biggest challenge you faced taking on this much-loved and long-running series?

 

The biggest challenge by far stems from the fact that the series has had such a long, successful life. There are more than two hundred fifty television episodes, which are still broadcast around the world daily. Fifty-two books were written in the series before I came on board. Since some of the early books were written while Murder, She Wrote was still on prime time television, the books are not exactly successors to the television series. Over time there have been many changes. For example, in the books, Sam Booth is no longer the mayor of Cabot Cove. He has been replaced by a man named Jim Shevlin, and Jim’s wife, Susan, is now the town travel agent, replacing Phyllis Grant. So I have to be extremely careful to keep my facts straight. I would hate to write a character as one of Jessica’s pals in a book only to find they were the murderer in a book written some time ago and are now sitting in a jail cell. The other issue from a writer’s perspective is that in the television episodes there are many scenes without Jessica being present. She may or may not learn what happens in those scenes later in the episode. The books are written in first person so Jessica either has to see what happens or someone has to tell her what they witnessed.

 

With your second Murder, She Wrote book coming out in November, Murder, She Wrote: Debonair in Death, it appears you don’t have much time between books. How many books will you be writing for the series—until they tell you to stop? And how often will you be releasing them?

 


My contract is for four books, two a year or basically a book every six months. Book number fifty-five, Killer on the Court (that is a tennis court) will be released in May 2022. My contract ends with book fifty-six, although there is always the possibility of renewal.

 

As the first woman to be co-writing the Murder, She Wrote series, what do you hope to bring to the series?

 

Well, Jessica and I do have gender in common, so there may be a bit more “girl talk” between Jessica and her female friends than we have seen in past books. In Murder, She Wrote: Killing in a Koi Pond, Jessica not only tries to protect her friend, Dolores, from the sheriff’s obvious interest in her as chief suspect in her husband’s murder, but she can relate to Dolores being suddenly thrust into widowhood. Through her own experiences, Jessica is able to be of comfort to Delores. Although I have not experienced widowhood myself, I have witnessed friends who have supported each other through the devastating trauma of spousal loss, and that role definitely suits Jessica. 

 

You have co-written books before, namely working with Laura Childs on her Scrapbooking Mystery Series. What challenges do you face, if any, working with another writer?

 


Laura is a dream collaborator. She is filled with creative ideas and has a very strong sense of the book before we’ve written a word. Still, writing is a solitary endeavor. So I would say the challenge of writing as a team is the fact that consulting with each other is an absolute must. On my own I can take a sharp turn with the plot or the actions of any character, but once you have a writing partner, that freedom is lacking, you cannot make major changes without consultation.

 

Many readers know you from your numerous and well-received short stories. What made you include novels in your repertoire?

 

My first attempt at writing was a cozy mystery novel that went nowhere. While I was shopping it around and getting battered by rejections, the New York Tri-State Sisters in Crime Chapter put out a call for submissions for a short story anthology. I submitted a story called “Strike Zone” and was elated when it made the cut. I have always loved the concept of shorts and focused on them for the next several years. But I kept shopping the novel, and finally an agent, the wonderful Kim Lionetti, took pity on me and signed me on as a client, provided I would commit to writing another novel. She, like everyone else, believed my first novel was not saleable. 

 



It was a pleasure being in the audience at Malice Domestic when you received the Agatha Best First Novel Award for your book, Well Read, Then Dead. What was it like winning that award for your first novel?

 


The honor of being nominated was so overwhelming that I never seriously considered the fact that I might win. What I remember most clearly of that wonderful evening is the joyful response from the attendees, most especially from the other Best First nominees. The communal spirit of the writing community continues to amaze me.

You have short stories in a number of anthologies, including the recently published, Only the Good Die Young: Crime Fiction Inspired by the Songs of Billy Joel. Is it safe to say that writing short stories is your first love?

As a reader I love short stories, and I have since childhood. In fact, when I was about eight or nine my parents took me to see the stage production of South Pacific. My father, who had spent four and half years in the Pacific during World War II, told me that the musical was based on a book of short stories called Tales of the South Pacific, written by James Michener. Of course, there was a copy of the book in the bookcase in our living room. I read it and that was the beginning of my love for short stories. Eventually my love of shorts and my love of mysteries meshed.


Now that you are writing the Murder, She Wrote series, will you be continuing with the Scrapbooking and Read Em’ and Eat mystery series?

The Read ’Em and Eat series was not renewed by Berkley, and I made the decision not to take it to another publisher or to self-publish. As to the Scrapbooking series, which I co-write with the talented Laura Childs, Berkley would like to see more books in the series. Laura and I have talked about it, but we are both working on multiple projects and cannot find a way to coordinate at this time. Still, I never say never.

You visit grandchildren in two different states several times a year. Does going back and forth play havoc with your writing routine? Are you more productive in one place than another?


When my first two grandchildren were born twelve days and thirteen hundred miles apart, I quit my job in the real world so that I could bounce back and forth spending time with each of them. For the first year of their lives, I traveled from state to state on alternating months. Now I make the trip five or six times a year. I am an extremely slow writer, so I cannot afford to let anything interfere with my writing. Visiting grandchildren is the exception that proves the rule. Generally, I do not write on travel day, the day before travel day, or the day after. Otherwise I write or do some writing related work every day. My motto is: Writing is a job. Publishing is a business.

Readers who follow you enjoyed vicariously the trip you made to Ireland with your family. Do you have any travel plans for when it becomes safe to travel again?

When it comes to travel, I will be absolutely thrilled when I can attend Malice Domestic and Bouchercon once again. As to family travel, we have no definite plans. In addition to the Ireland trip, we have had a number of “gatherings of the clan” over the years, but now the grandchildren are growing up. Several have part-time jobs, two will be in college next year, and two more the year after. We had enough trouble figuring out a travel schedule when we only had to deal with two school districts. Adding colleges and jobs to the mix makes travel unlikely, but again, you never know.

What are you working on now?

I am writing Murder, She Wrote: Killer on the Court, which is set in my home borough of Queens in New York City. Jessica is visiting her nephew Grady, his wife Donna, and their son Frank at a vacation beach bungalow, and Donna’s boss is murdered on the nearby tennis court! 

Thank you, Terrie.

To learn more about Terrie Farley Moran and her work, follow her at www.Terriefarleymoran.com


Tuesday, April 19, 2016

An Interview with the 2014 Agatha Best Short Story Nominee Authors



Malice Domestic’s 2014 Agatha Nominations for Best Short Story are:
“A Year Without Santa Claus?” (PDF) by Barb Goffman (Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine, Jan./Feb. 2015)
“A Questionable Death” (PDF) by Edith Maxwell, History & Mystery, Oh My (Mystery & Horror, LLC)
“A Killing at the Beausoleil” (PDF) by Terrie Farley Moran (Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine, Nov. 2015)
“Suffer the Poor” (PDF) by Harriette Sackler, History & Mystery, Oh My (Mystery & Horror, LLC)
“A Joy Forever” (PDF) by B.K. Stevens (Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine, March 2015)

Barb, Edith, Terrie, Harriette, and B.K (Bonnie) are all talented and seasoned short story authors. We are so pleased to welcome them to WRITERS WHO KILL to answer a couple of questions about how they weave their magic. Enjoy their answers, then take the opportunity to enjoy reading their nominated stories (just click on the links above). You’ll be delighted by their inventiveness and skill. Thanks so much to Barb, Edith, Terrie, Harriette, and Bonnie, and best wishes! -- Paula Gail Benson

Each of you is an accomplished short story author. What is the lure of writing short fiction and why do you find the craft satisfying?

Barb Goffman
BARB GOFFMAN:    There’s something special about getting an idea and bringing it to life, telling a story that entertains people or moves them or surprises them--or in the best of circumstances, does all three things at once. Other people can create things with hammer and saw or ingredients or music. I’m blessed that I can create worlds with words. That’s why I love writing.

Why short stories? One reason is because they’re so focused. I can start writing a story and finish it, in many cases, within a few days. That appeals to the part of me that likes getting things done and crossing them off my never-ending to-do list. I get a story idea, find the time to write the story (often the biggest challenge), revise, get feedback from trusted friends, revise once more, and send it off. With a novel, an author can spend months on the same story. In that same time span I can create a bunch of tales. It makes me feel productive. I like that.

EDITH MAXWELL:  I like writing just a nugget. Books are so long and complicated. It’s refreshing to focus on just one thing, only a few characters, the essentials of setting. My last few stories, including “A Questionable Death,” have all used the 1888 setting and main characters of my Quaker Midwife Mysteries. I’ve really enjoyed carving out one small new story from the wider palette of the historical series.

Terrie Farley Moran
TERRIE FARLEY MORAN:             I have always loved reading short fiction. In fact I’ve had a subscription to Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine since I was 14 years old and I began reading Alfred Hitchcock not too many years later. Nearly a dozen years ago I wrote a novel and I was just starting the second draft when my Sisters in Crime chapter put out a call for submissions for an anthology. I wrote “Strike Zone” and discovered that I loved writing short mystery fiction as much as I had always loved reading it. A short story is economical in words and ideas. The writer has to get the story rolling, make her point and end it. And she had to do it in a way that entertains the reader. I love meeting that challenge.

HARRIETTE SACKLER:      Great question. Over time, I’ve found that writing short stories is a terrific way for me to explore subjects I’m interested in. Ever since my undergraduate days as a sociology major, I’ve been fascinated by how people interact with society. After exploring topics related to my interest, I find the outcome is often a short story. My Agatha-nominated story resulted from a visit to London’s East End and my research on Victorian life during the 1800’s. For me, it’s an interesting and satisfying progression and allows me to move from place and time to place and time exploring different topics.

B,K, Stevens
B.K.STEVENS:          I enjoy writing both short stories and novels. It all depends on the story I want to tell, the characters I want to develop, and the effect I want to create—some are right for short stories, some for longer forms. In “A Joy Forever,” for example, the plot idea is simple, I wanted to work with only three characters, and I wanted to create a humorous effect. If I’d tried to stretch the plot idea out to novel length, it would have gotten unbearably boring; if I’d piled on subplots, the slender foundation would have collapsed under their weight. And if we’d had to see Gwen suffering for year after year, I think her story would have become so poignant that the humor would have been lost. Similarly, if I’d added more characters, they would have been a distraction from the little three-person drama I wanted to develop. In “The Philosophy of Composition,” Poe says that because short stories can be read in one sitting, they can achieve a “unity of effect” longer works often lack: Thoughts about the outside world never interrupt us while we’re reading, so the story can draw us in more completely. I agree with Poe, partly because every element in a well-written short story can be directly relevant to one central effect. So there are no internal interruptions, as well as no external ones—perfect for a “unity of effect.” Of course, a novel can develop a variety of effects, and that can be delightful, too. I don’t think one form is better than the other. I think they’re just different.

Do you consider your writing plot-driven, character-driven, neither, or a combination?

BARB GOFFMAN:    Combination. I start with conflict. Character reacts to conflict and that drives the plot. For instance, in my Agatha-nominated story “A Year Without Santa Claus?” my main character, Annabelle, is a determined woman who will put herself at risk in order to do what’s right. (She’s a fairy who’s the head of everything magical that happens in New Jersey, including having Santa deliver presents to kids in the state at Christmas.) When Santa says New Jersey is too dangerous for him this year (because someone--or someones--have been killing people who dress as enchanted beings), Annabelle decides she has to find the killer in order to make Santa feel safe again and thus save Christmas. If Annabelle were less tenacious or less inquisitive, the story would have gone another way. (Does she save Christmas? Read the story to find out!)

Edith Maxwell
EDITH MAXWELL:  My short stories have to be a combination – well, so do my books. Sometimes I’ll get the inspiration for a short story from a character and build the story around that. And sometimes it’s the crime that drives it. I’ve now written several stories featuring Rose Carroll, my Quaker midwife, solving crimes with her fun, eccentric friend, postmistress Bertie Winslow. Those stories definitely started with character.

TERRIE FARLEY MORAN: My writing is character driven. Whatever situation exists in any story, it is the action of the characters that moves the story forward. Every character will react differently to the exact same set of circumstances, and it is those differences that bring a story to life. I also think that setting is underrated in short fiction. Often setting can be quite effective in providing the appropriate background to give a story added zest.

Harriette Sackler
HARRIETTE SACKLER:      While I hope I create interesting story plots, I’d have to say that my stories are character driven, given that I consider “setting” an important element of character development. I want my readers to experience the time and place in which my characters live their lives.

B.K. STEVENS:         I hate to be evasive, but I’d have to say it’s a combination—and sometimes it’s more plot-driven, sometimes more character-driven. In flash fiction, for me, plot tends to dominate, since there’s not much time to develop character: I get an idea for a simple plot with a couple of sharp twists at the end, and that’s the focus of the story. The characters tend to be types—the clever detective, the sweet old lady, the greedy relative, and so on. In longer stories, the characters often become more important than plot. “A Joy Forever,” for example, began with a plot device—an idea for a murder method. If I’d written it as flash fiction, the murder method probably would have remained the focus, and I would have tried for as much surprise at the end as possible. Since I decided to develop the story at greater length, the murder method became less important, and I didn’t try to keep it a secret. Most readers will probably figure it out long before the narrator does, so the final incident in the plot isn’t likely to come as a complete surprise (though I hope readers find it satisfying and humorous). The main interest in this story, I think, centers on Gwen’s character, on her evolving relationship with the narrator, and on the fates of the works of art associated with the three characters—Mike’s statue, Gwen’s tapestry, and the narrator’s photograph.