Before the age of computers, a writer’s tools consisted of a
simple pen and paper. The process took the form of write, edit, re-write, edit,
and finally, type the finished product for submission. Sure, a writer could opt
to type from the start, and many did, but typewriters were loud in those days,
keys clacked, and jammed, interrupting the story world. Corrections were made
with a gritty pencil-like tool that had a brush on the end and often resulted
in holes in the paper.
In the 1980s, personal computers made their debut. There was
no wide-scale access to the Internet to offer a distraction, and the keyboards
were semi-silent. Plus, editing was a breeze. No more rewriting entire passages
that passed muster, instead, cut and paste! A writer’s dream come true.
The Internet opened up the writer’s world to writing
programs. I tried one named Dramatica. If a
writer had a story or character problem, the program had a feature that provided
a potential solution. Several writers I knew used it and loved it.
Unfortunately, it proved too option rich for me.
Microsoft Word became my weapon of choice for writing. It
had its limitations, cut and paste were unwieldly when the manuscript was novel
length. Moving scenes and maintaining continuity proved difficult and creating
multiple files for each aspect of the novel often meant spending more time
going back and forth in the directory tree than writing. The search and replace
functions were heaven sent. If only someone would invent a writing program, I
thought, that let you have everything in one place and allowed for an easy
story reorganization.
Enter Scrivener. The
program was everything I dreamed about in a writing program. It’s perfect for
pantsers and plotters. Each chapter or scene (depending on how you write) has
index cards that can be used for listing the highlights of the scene. Master
index cards can help outline the novel before you write. Best of all, if
Chapter 3 needs to be Chapter 10, drag, drop, and done. There are sections for
a story bible, character lists, settings, and research on the same screen as
the manuscript. Scrivener allows the writer to be the architect of their own
writing environment.
Literature and Latte, the publisher of Scrivener, also makes
Scapple. The
definition of the word scapple hails from the stonecutting industry and means
to work roughly without finishing. Scapple isn’t a writing program, it’s a mind
map program. I’m using it to show the relationships among my characters to
determine if any are walk-ons who need to be cut. The map includes each character’s
motive, means, and opportunity for the murder and demonstrates if the clues and
red herrings do their jobs. It’s a shorthand way to uncover any outliers and
either develop or discard them to tighten the story.
From pen and paper to pixels and bytes, a writer’s tools
have expanded. None is right for every writer, but the options are exciting. Do
you use any writing programs? Have you found they aided or invaded your
writing?
I haven't mastered Scrivener. I tried it, but didn't find it intuitive, and retreated back to Word, which is just easy and comfortable for me, even if it's too linear in some ways. I may give Scrivener another try with a fresh project, when I can integrate learning the system into project development somehow.
ReplyDeleteScapple sounds interesting, though. I teach college writing, and I encourage my students to do mind maps. I'll definitely look into it.
I spend enough time in Word trying to delete page number one from a title page. I use a large sketchpad for character relationships and a large sheet of graph paper for a day-by-day calendar of the action.
ReplyDeleteHi Cate - Scrivener does have a learning curve, and I know I only use 10% of what is available in the program. It's all about how comfortable you are and your writing style. Whatever works is the best program for you.
ReplyDeleteScapple has a free trial period, I believe. I think you'll like it!
HI Margaret - Sketchpad is how I started, too. Love the graph paper idea for a calendar. Do you keep track of anything else on the chart? Sounds like it would be a great place to note red herrings, clues, and the like, too.
ReplyDeleteI've tried Scrivener a couple of times without success. It sounds great, but ....
ReplyDeleteOver the years, by time I became comfortable with each new writing program, it became obsolete and a new one introduced. I have to admit I'm reluctant to try some of the new, "improved" programs.
ReplyDeleteHi Warren, it is definitely not for everyone. Finding what works for each writer is most important, and you have!
ReplyDeleteHi Kathleen - I know exactly what you mean! It seems like that happens to all programs. When I started using a word processor, I used WordStar - now almost no one had heard of that. The same seems to happen with writing programs, probably any program.
ReplyDelete