The short story has
always been the traditional training ground where aspiring fiction writers honed
their skills until they felt ready to bravely scale the Everest of their first
novel. My own writing history turned that traditional career route topsy turvy.
I had written and doctored a number of screenplays, but not a single short
story, when I wrote three chapters of a novel and apprehensively gave it to a
literary agent. He said he would get back to me in ten days. On the tenth day
he informed me that he had passed it on to the newly-named head of a well-known
publishing house. She, too, promised an answer in ten days. On the twentieth
day after the agent's first phone call, he delivered the news that the publisher
had made an offer for my novel. With absolutely no experience in narrative
fiction, I was now a novelist! Magic!
That first novel
was followed by others, which have connected me to many readers in over a dozen
languages. In all that time I never wrote short fiction nor was I tempted to. Yet
I recently reversed the traditional career trajectory by putting aside a novel
I was finishing to write, in quick succession, three short-story murder
mysteries. You have to be wondering why a lifelong novelist would risk
venturing out of his comfort zone into the short-fiction-mystery genre already occupied
by thousands of skilled writers? There lies a tale.
To put it most simply,
I found myself afflicted by that great curse of the fiction writer: a compelling
idea. The germ that led to that contagion was the news that lesbian friends
were divorcing but would share custody of the two boys, raised as brothers, to
which each had given birth. At about that same time, MWA announced it was
soliciting stories for its annual anthology of murder mysteries, this time to
be aimed at teenage girls. You are all probably ahead of me: The idea that
gripped me was what if the separating lesbian mothers had teenage daughters who
considered themselves sisters? For the murder victim I chose the town's most
powerful, hated, and lecherous man, the judge who was marrying the mother who had
precipitated the same-sex breakup.
I could have
said, "What the hell do I know about writing a short story?" Or,
after wasting a few days in awkward scribbling, I could have scurried back into
the safe, spacious architecture of the long form, no harm done. Instead, over
the course of those few days, I wrote the first draft of "Judgement
Day." Having labored for well over a year on some novels, I was astonished
and overjoyed to find that in less than a week, apart from revisions and
polishing, I had in my hands a complete, intriguing story. I asked a few
friends whose opinion I trusted to read it. Their verdict? They liked the story.
The truth is it never
occurred to me that I might be stepping into a mine field. My unearned
confidence derived, I think, from my being a story teller who values
succinctness in welding character to plot. My problem with the story was not
discomfort with the genre, but rather that my characters and their plot would
have to exist within the confines of the anthology´s intended market. Much of
today's YA fiction deals with gritty material, but would the judges picking stories
for the anthology risk MWA´s good name by presenting teenage girls with a tale that
centered on a salacious, if well-deserved, murder? I have no idea if homogenizing
that crucial scene might have lifted the story into the table of contents, but
it felt like amputation; I couldn't bring myself to do it.
I had so enjoyed
writing my first short story that I wanted to come up with another. This one originated
with an odd title I couldn´t get out of my mind. That was all I had: a title without
the slightest hint of a tale attached to it. What did "The Girl Who Spoke
Ventriloquism" mean? Who was the girl? And what was this ventriloquism? I
was wrestling with all of that when the gods of fiction granted me a moment of
utter inspiration. An image of Killarney, Ireland, which I had visited the
previous year, popped into my head and then the quirky film festival hosted
each year by a nearby village along the Ring of Kerry. I will be forever
grateful that instead of dismissing those flashes of recollection, I seized on them
as welcome gifts from my subconscious.
I was on a roll
and even had an idea for a third story. When Donald Trump's lawyer informed him
that the pre-nuptial agreement was about to expire that limited what he would
have to pay his second wife if their marriage ended, Trump directed him to sue for
divorce. That act of cold-eyed frugality was the seed for "Deadline
Divorce." Like the other two stories, I couldn't imagine them any longer
or shorter, which I realized was one mark of a good short story I had gotten
right.
I also realized
that I hated the idea of waiting months, usually fruitlessly, to hear whether or
not a mystery magazine would buy a story. My beloved agent had passed on, so I
decided to self-publish all three stories as a book. There would be no advance,
but there would be satisfaction in making them available to readers. I chose a
title appropriate to their general style, designed a cover, and pushed the upload
button.
Death Can Delight: A Trio of Mysteries can be purchased
at Amazon.com in modestly-priced paperback and Kindle.
The excellent reviews
have been gratifying. I learned I wasn´t delusional in believing that despite
my inexperience with the genre I could write entertaining short stories, and I loved
doing it. Be sure that I am now always on the lookout for future lightning
strikes of short-fiction inspiration to fill what I will probably call Death Can Delight Again. You see, I have
this idea for a story.
Joseph Amiel is
the author of the novels Birthright,
Deeds, A Question of Proof, Stalking The Sky, and Star Time. He created the web series AIN'T THAT LIFE, which is available,
along with more information about him, at www.JosephAmiel.com.
He is a graduate of the Ethical Culture
Fieldston School, Amherst College, and Yale Law School. He lives with his wife
in New York.
Congratulations on your latest release! I take a break from traditional mysteries to write a batch of cozy short stories, then revert back to novels.
ReplyDeleteI love short stories. They have different "needs" than full-length novels, which can make them tricky to write, and fulfil a different niche for the readers.
ReplyDeleteAfter writing a novel, I attended a conference and participated in a flash fiction exercise that called for the use of specific words. Those words prompted me to write about things that would never have occurred to me. Later, I dusted it off and turned it into a short story--my very first. So I was backwards on my approach to the short story too.
ReplyDeleteHow interesting to hear from other novelists who are also invigorated by writing short stories! And I think "invigorated" is the right word, or maybe "energized." A slogging feeling can sometimes suck at the novelist like quicksand after a few weeks or months, often somewhere in the middle of the book when you're forearms deep in the spaghetti of material you need to develop into that great slam bang ending you can't wait to write. I found the brevity of crafting a short story kept me on a writer's high throughout, the initiating idea propelling me right past any depressing mid-story crisis.
ReplyDeleteJoseph Amiel
I think mysteries are well-suited to short stories. Isn't it interesting that writing them is so different from writing novels?
ReplyDeleteWarren, one reviewer of DEATH CAN DELIGHT expressed astonishment that I could get 3 full stories into 64 pages without skimping on character development, but I think like the marathon runner who enters a sprint, you streamline your strides for the faster pace. Does that make sense?
ReplyDeleteJoseph Amiel