Today we welcome author and scientist J L Greger to Salad Bowl Saturday.
~ Jim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many
Americans consider science to be collection of boring facts, as dry as the
stuffed animals and bones in natural history museums. That unfortunate
misconception probably reflects poorly taught classes in school.
Science
should be thought of as a verb not a noun. Science is the collecting of
information on the natural world in an organized and systematic way and the
applying the accumulated knowledge to solve problems or test hypotheses.
Aha, you say. That definition
of science sounds a bit like crime solving and mystery writing, actually novel
writing in general.
Writing a
novel is a lot like doing a science experiment.
1. Writers and scientists
both do a lot of sleuthing. Granted, scientists try to quantitate their
observations more than writers. And writers’ descriptions of their observations
are hopefully more colorful than journal articles.
2. They both organize their
observations into a whole, which writers call plots and scientists call
hypotheses.
3. They both test and refine
their “whole.” Writers edit their prose; scientists run additional experiments.
4. Both require a lot of hard
work to gain occasional flashes of insights. To paraphrase Thomas Edison,
they’re “one percent inspiration and
ninety-nine percent perspiration.”
Why did I
drag you through this discussion?
I’m
trying to explain why so many scientists and physicians became writers of
mysteries and thrillers. Consider Michael Crichton (a physician by training),
Kathy Reichs (a forensic anthropologist), Robin Cook (a physician).
And in
the process I’m explaining how as a retired biology professor I became a writer
of medical mystery/suspense novels: Coming Flu and the recently released
Murder:
A New Way to Lose Weight. Even worse, I was at one time an associate
dean in a medical school, the perfect spot to observe... (I must choose the
adjective carefully because I don’t want repercussions. I could say wise even
profound, egotistical, funny, or aberrant maybe weird. I’ll say…) interesting
behavior and thought patterns of faculty and staff.
Do you
want to be a medical school “insider?”
Meet the
scientists and physicians in Murder: A New Way to Lose Weight.
Linda Almquist, the protagonist, is
beginning two miserable processes – losing weight and fitting into a new job as
the interim associate dean of a medical school. Things get tougher when she is
told that two diet doctors at the school may be endangering the health of their
obese subjects.
The diet doctors (Izzy Roth and Richard
Varegos) think they can help obese patients lose weight by altering the
bacteria in their guts. (Sound weird? This is an active and legitimate area of
research. Check out the journal Science, volume 336, pages 32-33 in
2012). Before Linda can even begin her investigation of the allegations against
the diet doctors, she finds Izzy dead. Was it murder?
“You’re
in a medical school.” Omar (the medical examiner) walked closer to Hitchings
(the lead police officer) and spoke more softly. “Everyone in this building
probably knows how to kill someone without using a gun or knife. A complete tox
screen will take weeks. And this woman was only in her thirties, pretty young
to die suddenly.”
Linda
and police suspect Richard. Who wouldn’t? He’s a wheeler-dealer.
Linda Almquist, who seldom even smiled,
laughed.
Richard
Varegos had done it again. He had arranged books and a computer on the front
counter of the hospital pavilion for a photo shoot. In the resulting glossy,
full-color flyer, he sat with at his make-believe teak desk in his supposedly
marble-walled office. She read the flyer’s title: THE DIET DOCTOR HAS ANSWERS
FOR YOUR WEIGHT PROBLEMS.
Was
there no end to his ego?
But they
can’t ignore the strange behavior of several of the old-timers in
the medical school. What secret could the quarrelsome Millie Peak, the old Casanova
Abel Raines, and the authoritative dean share?
Although
the characters of this southwestern medical school are fictional, they’ll seem
real (I hope) as Linda chases clues and shadows through the labyrinths of the
medical school and commiserates with her sister Sara (the protagonist of Coming
Flu) at various restaurants around Albuquerque.
How can
you start sleuthing now?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can learn more about J.
L. Greger, professor emerita of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, at her
website (www.jlgreger.com) and
her blog J. L. Greger’s Bugs (http://jlgregerblog.blogspot.com). She and her Japanese Chin Bug live in the
American Southwest. Bug is the one non-fictional character in her books. He’s
also the cutest and nicest one.
I'm interested in science, although I never worked in the scientific field. It was an early dream of mine to own a really state of the art microscope like those I used in my college biology class. Even though I didn't pursue a science career, I made sure my third grade students had more science adventures than reading from a text book. Our first unit of the year was a month long one studying insects, arachnids and earthworms conducting experiments and going the whole route starting with their hypothesis. My room not only had a science center, when we were in the little critter unit, my room was full of chirping crickets and the occasional grasshopper that escaped and led the kids on a merry chase. I also had a list of Super Science Spelling words added to their weekly spelling list like; entomologist, photosynthesis, etc.
ReplyDeleteI wrote the titles of your books on my TBR list. They sound like books I'd like to read.
Gloria, sounds like you were a great teacher. We often overlook how important grade school experiences in science are. I always said by the time I got them in graduate school all I could do was sand off the rough edges. They were already formed in how they thought about science.
ReplyDeleteI also want to thank Jim Jackson for hosting me.
JL Grger
"Science should be thought of as a verb not a noun. Science is the collecting of information on the natural world in an organized and systematic way and the applying the accumulated knowledge to solve problems or test hypotheses."
ReplyDeleteThe main advantage of a science (or mathematics) eduction is less in the subject material and more in developing a way of understanding the world.
Science teaches us how to develop hypotheses and question them. Mathematics teaches us that world we construct depends not only on the "rules" but the assumptions (or starting point) that exist before starting the rules.
I everyone knew these two basic ways of understanding the world, the politicians would have a much harder time spouting absolute nonsense and getting away with it.
~ Jim
JL, since I was a self-contained teacher and didn't have to switch classes, I had a lot more freedom than the teachers who only taught one subject for a set amount of minutes. I could also extend my science lessons into math problem solving, writing stores and/or poetry. I did the same thing with social studies. I also gave the kids the facts about snakes, arachnids, etc. and how important they were in the ecosystem. One of the highlights of our week long study of earthworms was the great earthworm race on the last day. Each student had a worm they'd kept in a container on their desk the whole week. They named it, measured it, looked for bristles under magnifying glasses, etc. plus wrote stories or poems about their worm. There were two circles on a large tagboard. Four students at a time put their worms in the center circle and the worm that reached the outer circle first was the winner of that round. They were not allowed to poke or touch their worm, but oh boy could they cheer and coax their worm. Finally, the winning worm from each round had a run off to see which worm was the fastest. The winners got a prize, but everyone who participated in the week long study got gummy worms. I sure loved teaching this age. What fun they were.
ReplyDeleteJanet, loved your accurate comparison of science and writing. You also reminded me the dean of mystery writing, Arthur Conan Doyle, was also a doctor.
ReplyDeleteComing Flu is already on my TBR list. This one sounds equally interesting.
I'm not a doctor, but I can sure understand what you're saying. Excellent post, and thank you for putting things in a new perspective for me.
ReplyDeleteMarja McGraw
Glad I struck a nerve with several of you. Jim's right. Good science education emphasizes thinking logically not facts per se. That's why I like to read and write mysteries, they make you think.
ReplyDeleteJL Greger