Showing posts with label Maddi Davidson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maddi Davidson. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

An Interview With Maddi Davidson

by Grace Topping

This is the second in a series of interviews with writers who write as a team.

Maddi Davidson is the pen name for two sisters, Diane and Mary Ann Davidson. Living on opposite coasts, they have written three books in their Miss-Information Technology Mystery series and some short stories, and in their words, imposed complex technology on unsuspecting customers.

After reading the opening paragraph from Outsourcing Murder, the first book in the Miss-Information Technology Mystery series, I knew I was in for a hilarious read:

There are a lot of things you shouldn’t face in the morning until well-caffeinated: the bathroom scale; any small-bladdered French-named dog that fits into a handbag; trying on bathing suits; or explaining to friends and family that you are a murder suspect.

I had to find out how Diane and Mary Ann managed to work together three thousand miles apart, keep a sense of humor, and still speak at family reunions.

It is my pleasure to welcome Diane and Mary Ann Davidson to Writers Who Kill.

Grace Topping


Tell us about Emma Jones and the Miss-Information Technology Mystery series.

Diane Davidson
Emma is a 20-something IT consultant whose impulsiveness is both a virtue and a curse. Bad luck may be responsible for her tripping over dead bodies at every turn, but her actions subsequent to those discoveries lead to humorous, albeit dangerous, situations.

What was it about working in information technology that drove you both to write about murder? Have your co-workers accused you of writing about them?

The frustrations of dealing with technology regularly drive us all to near-homicidal rage, so it’s just a hop, skip and a jump to writing about the IT industry as a potentially murderous minefield. Some of the wackiness we’ve experienced (yes, we poach work experiences for our stories) are better than what we can make up (like the co-worker who wouldn’t take an online training class he claimed contained a Satanic symbol).

No co-worker has accused us of writing about them (and we haven’t), but we did sail close to the wind with a character inspired by a detested ex-boyfriend, albeit 80 pounds heavier and with 80% less hair. We enjoyed the effect, literarily speaking, of course.

What motivated you to write as a team?
Mary Ann Davidson

Sharing experiences about the lunacy we’ve experienced and seen in the technology industry. As long as technology remains imperfect, we have literary fodder. (Keep on putting software in household appliances: before long, some hacker in Bulgaria will hold your wet laundry hostage.)

We look at the world in the same way: through a demented sense of humor. We also feel we are much stronger as a writing team than as individual authors.

Besides living on separate coasts, what’s the biggest challenge you face working on the same project (novels and short stories)?

Time commitments. Diane is retired from the corporate world while Mary Ann still holds a demanding position with a technology company, which limits the time (and energy) she has for working on stories. Mary Ann tries to write in a timely manner and Diane tries not to push too hard for progress (even when Mary Ann moves slower than the average glacier).

Please tell us about your process? How do you divide up the work?

We toss around an idea until we think we have the makings of a good story. For a novel, we’ll each write sections for the first draft, with Diane managing the overall structure of the manuscript. On a short story, Diane will write the SFD (Sh#**y First Draft), consulting with Mary Ann on plot hang-ups or ideas that aren’t working.

For both novels and short stories, we throw a Word doc over the wall when one is sick of working on it and needs input from the other. Occasionally, there will be a specific request (can you write chapter X, tart up character Y?). Recently, we’ve been focused on short stories and have several underway at a time that we swap back and forth.

Do you bring different skills to the team?

Diane is the structural engineer – planning the work, ensuring it is sound and the rooms flow - and Mary Ann is the decorator – adding a pop of color (or a colorful phrase) and tarting up the interior. Having different skills makes two halves of a whole team.

Which one of you contributes the humor, which is hilarious?

We both do. Having grown up together – and had some of the same work experiences between the Navy and the IT industry – we have the same offbeat humor. In some cases, one of us is thinking about adding a particularly snarky comment to the dialogue only to find the other one has already done so.

Do you ever disagree? If so, who has the final say?


We try to be brutally honest with our own writing. No matter how clever we think a bit of writing is, if it does not advance the plot (or is bogging the pace down), it gets nuked. If we can use it elsewhere, great; otherwise it goes to “bit heaven.” In cases where we may not agree on a plot twist or a section of writing, whoever wants it the most (or has the best blackmail material on the other) wins. Our disagreements tend to be minor and are resolved easily (by the one who makes the last edits to the story). J

What advice would you give writers who plan to work together?

“Have your wills in order.”

Do either of you write separately under your own name?

Nope: we are two parts of a whole. We write better together than either one of us does separately. <Diane: Except I write the best parts.> <Mary Ann: As if! >

You have some wonderful characters in your books. My favorite is Magda Basilone, Emma’s landlady. An Army brat, who married a Marine killed in action, and later married to an Air Force officer, she is a firm supporter of the military. What inspired Magda?

I think she’s our favorite character, too. We have known a number of Magda-like women, oft married to big muckety-mucks in the military, but who were formidable in their own way. No shrinking violets, these women took on the roles of mom, dad, chief cook and bottle washer, plumber, mechanic, gardener, financial planner and more when their husbands were deployed for ten months or more. It’s been a privilege to know them.

Both of you served in the Navy. Was it a family tradition? Did serving with people from all walks of life and those hardship tours in Hawaii influence your writing?

Everyone in our immediate family (except mom!) served in the military (our father and brother were in the Air Force) and we did spend some of our formative years on a military post. One of us lived in Hawai’i and we’ve both traveled there extensively and been inspired by the beauty, people, waves, lovely music…and the hallucinatory effect of one too many Mai Tais.

You now have three books in the Miss-Information Technology Mystery series. I hope we’ll be seeing more. What’s next for Emma Jones?

Emma is going to join a startup and make a bazillion dollars by designing a mobile app that tracks the timing of labor contractions and emails the results to family members. Oh wait, that app exists. Darn. I guess we’ll have to keep Emma on hiatus while we explore other characters and technology-related crimes.

“Vehicular Homicide,” about a driverless car committing murder was published in the Summer/Fall 2015 issue of The Ghouls' Review. “Heartfelt” published in the Mystery Times 2015 anthology centers on a hacked pacemaker. In the works are drone killings and more technology mayhem. So much bad technology, so many deaths to plot…

Thank you, Diane and Mary Ann, for joining us at Writers Who Kill.

For more information about Maddi Davidson and the Miss-Information Technology Mystery series, visit them at www.maddidavidson.com

For additional information about writing with a partner, visit their blog entry:
http://maddidavidson.com/2011/11/15/shall-we-dance-writing-with-a-partner/



Saturday, April 11, 2015

Murderous Geeks by Maddi Davidson


We, the sisters who make up Maddi Davidson, are often asked how we ended up writing information technology murder mysteries. Simple! Both of us worked in IT and decided that the information technology sector was under-served––or perhaps, under-server-ed––as a medium for parody. Who doesn’t have at least one bizarre technology experience, e.g., the computer says that your water bill was $47,298 last month and computers are never wrong, right? This actually happened to one of us, who happens to know that she did not take a 28-day shower. Fortunately, her local utility mavens were even more skeptical of computers than we are and corrected the bill.
Many users of technology are as enamored of technologists as they are of other professional “ists,” like proctologists. In fact, the average computer upgrade feels just exactly like…oh never mind. Encounters with IT can inspire anxiety headaches as large as the RMS Titanic and inspire rampant murderous thoughts involving chain saws––energy efficient saws, as it is so important to be an eco-friendly homicidal maniac! In short, homicide and technology go together like rap music and really good earplugs. We believe our stories provide a public service: dispatching a purveyor of technology allows our readers the opportunity to experience a frisson of schadenfreude, a fancy term for “boy, he/she sure had that coming!”
The technology field is rife with dramatic (not to mention humorous) possibilities, and we are not just talking about companies that track your every move online, collect as much information as they can, and then complain about a government invasion of privacy. So many companies and organizations have used technology to “improve service” (e.g., removing real people so you can go online and take 285 steps and a couple of Valium to complete a transaction) that the average user has more than 78 passwords. Okay, we made that number up, but it’s still a lot. Companies and organizations demand you sign in and choose a password, even for mundane activities such as reading a newspaper online that really, you don’t want to pay for but can stomach 10 articles a month, maybe, if it doesn’t contain too many stories on the Kardashians. And you can’t necessarily use the passwords you want: you must use capitals, lower case, numbers, and characters. Only a Mensa member can remember &8jauOhcraponit,seriously? as a password. So, technology itself is a character in our books, even if it’s a character nobody would mind killing off.
Another element in our stories is the location in which the action occurs: San Francisco and its environs for our first two books, and Hawai’i for our third. Both have a strong sense of place, and that adds verisimilitude to a story––verisimilitude being a fancy word for “making sure you don’t get caught out having Van Ness cross Franklin Street when everybody in San Francisco knows they parallel each other, you failure-to-fact-check doofus.” One of us lives in San Francisco and knows that, however many the charms of the city, some of the you-can’t-make-this-stuff-up weirdness is more amusing than anything we can invent. Having a character perplexed by the parse tree of recycling bins is both accurate and farcical: “recycle” and “trash” have long since been replaced by “paper,” “plastic,” “glass,” “batteries,” and “compost.” Although, you may only be able to recycle plastic up to category 5; oh wait, we digress.  
We are often asked how we write together when we live thousands of miles apart. Microsoft Word and track changes is the short answer. Additionally, we share the same demented sense of humor from growing up together. We each appreciate the other’s strengths. One of us is the structural engineer: outlining plot, putting the framing up, and ensuring soundness of what we are building. The other one is more the interior decorator: filling in the home, adding a pop of color here and there. The entire plot may rise or fall on whether we have granite countertops! Or, maybe we mixed the metaphor too much. When we have questions about whether something works, whoever feels the strongest “wins.” Yet, both of us respect pacing: whatever we write has to advance the story, not our egos. Especially in a murder mystery, you want your reader turning the next page eagerly to find out whodunnit, not wondering whether the character is a refugee from a Henry James novel, wandering around contemplating the meaning of life.
Above all, we try to have fun with our writing. We have no Tolstoyian aspirations. Or Mother Gooseian aspirations, either. What we hope is that our readers will have a good laugh. A merry heart, as it says in Proverbs, doeth good like medicine. We hope so. 

Maddi Davidson is the pen name for two sisters, Mary Ann Davidson and Diane Davidson. Residing on opposite coasts of the US, the sisters have spent too many years inflicting “new and improved” information technology solutions on dubious users. Their short story “Heartfelt” will appear in Mystery Times 2015, to be published in April by Buddhapuss Ink. Another short story, “Whiteout,” will appear in Chesapeake Crimes: Storm Warnings in 2016. In addition, they’ve published three novels in the Miss-Information Technology Mystery Series, available through Amazon: Outsourcing Murder, Denial of Service, and With Murder You Get Sushi. More information is available on their website: maddidavidson.com