Showing posts with label Indie Publishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indie Publishing. Show all posts

Monday, July 13, 2026

Give 'Em Back: A Guest Post by Patricia Sargeant

Many thanks to the Writers Who Kill authors for inviting me to visit. I’m thrilled to be here.

I love the sound of the term “reversion of rights.” It’s not just the alliteration but also the definition. In publishing, reversion of rights—also referred to as “termination of transfer”; more alliteration—means authors get their work back. Quoting from the University of Houston Libraries website, “In the U.S., termination of transfers laws enable authors to regain rights in their works that might have been signed away—even if their contracts contain language to the contrary.” (Emphasis by University of Houston Libraries.)

 

Some authors don’t see the point of getting back the rights to a book that already has been published. What would they do with it?

 

Tell me why

Here are a few of the reasons reversion of rights is important to me (no particular order):

·      It’s my work and I want it back.

·      I can reissue the book to generate additional income.

·      I can use the book as a reader magnet for my e-newsletter.

·      It’s my work and I want it back.

·      I can continue the series.

·      I can repackage/rebrand the series.

 

Did I mention it’s my work and I want it back? So, how do we do that?

 

Step 1: The book is mine.

One of the first things I do after signing a publishing contract is put my reversion of rights date on a calendar. Yes, it’s that serious to me.

 

Years ago, one of the professional writer organizations I used to belong to provided members with a template reversion of rights letter. Each time I send a reversion of rights request, I personalize the content and email it to the publisher’s contracts lawyer. Usually, I receive an insultingly rapid response, confirming my rights reversion. (They could at least pretend to be sorry to see me go.)

 

That confirmation email is important. Some platforms require authors verify they’ve received the rights to their book back.

 

Step 2: All the words

In most cases, publishers no longer have the production file for your book. Ask for it, but be prepared to hear it’s been destroyed. Sadness. But never fear. You’ve got plenty of options for recreating your text files.

·      I always keep two author copies of my books. I use one to break apart and scan when I’m ready to reissue it. I’ve purchased a low-cost, serviceable scanner.

·      If you’ve kept your final manuscript electronic file, you can update it.

·      There are services you can pay to scan a copy of your book.

 

Worst-case scenario, you retype your manuscript. I can hear your screams.

 

Step 3: Cover me

In most cases, reversion of rights refers only to the text of your book. Usually authors don’t have any claim to the cover. I know; tragic. But again, you have options, including:

·      Sites on which you can find designers to create your cover;

·      Online companies that offer template covers;

·      Product-specific videos that teach you to design your own covers.

 

One final comment as I hope our Writers Who Kill authors don’t notice I’m going over my word count. (More contractions!) Please make sure your book is copyright protected.

 

Thank you again for this opportunity to visit with the Writers Who Kill community. I’m so grateful.

 

This post is a brief overview of the process for reissuing your book. If you have any questions, I’ll do my best to answer.

 



Bio: Patricia Sargeant writes romantic suspense. She also writes cozy mysteries as Olivia Matthews and romance as Regina Hart. Her work has been featured in national publications such as Publishers Weekly, USA Today, Kirkus Reviews, Suspense Magazine, Mystery Scene Magazine, and Library Journal. Patricia is a member of Sisters in Crime, Crime Writers of Color, Cozy Mystery Crew, and Chicks on the Case. Visit her online at PatriciaSargeant.com and check out her Peach Coast Library books here.

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Amazon is Bad for Authors’ Wealth

By James M. Jackson


I have a love/hate relationship with Amazon. They sell more of my books than all other retailers combined. Through KDP (Kindle Direct Publishing), they make it easy to upload and change files. And for that, they never charge a fee. That’s the love.

What they pay me, and their arbitrary rules and the hoops they employ, trigger a strong hate response.

Amazon Prime Pricing

What does Amazon Prime have to do with my writing business? It sets the stage for my argument about pricing. Amazon introduced Prime in February 2005 at $79 for the year. Adjust that price with inflation[i], that would now be about $126. The actual cost is $139. For that 10% real-dollar increase, Amazon added Prime Video (initially without ads, but now I have to pay more to avoid them). Their initial guaranteed delivery of Prime-eligible merchandise is a thing of the past. Although shipping remains free, if the delivery date slips—well that’s life. To summarize: for the 10% increase I now have ad-supported Amazon Video, and less attractive shipping. Let’s call that a fair deal and move on to things that are not fair.

Kindle Unlimited Pricing

Kindle Unlimited is the subscription service that allows members to read unlimited amounts of the content they make available. It began in 2014 at $9.99 a month. Inflation adjusted to the present, that’s equivalent to about $12.85. The price is now $11.99, so Amazon has taken an inflation-adjusted 7% hit.

How Amazon Pays Authors for books read in Kindle Unlimited

For authors’ books to be available to Kindle Unlimited readers, the book must be exclusive to Amazon under a ninety-day contract (called “Kindle Select”) with Amazon’s Kindle Direct Press (KDP). KDP pays authors based on the number of pages of their works KU members read each month. In July 2015 (the first date included in the data published by Written Word Media[ii]), the payment rate was $.005779 per page. KDP counts pages in a way that makes sense only to them. My ~90,000-word novels average 450-500 pages the way they count for KU payments. (The actual paperbacks have far fewer pages.) We’ll be generous and use 500 pages. That means if someone read my book cover to cover in July 2015, KDP would have paid me $2.89. Adjusting that with inflation to today, it becomes $3.72.

The reimbursement rate per page has steadily declined over the years. For December 2023, it sat at $.00437. That same book would now earn only $2.19. In real dollars, they are paying less than 60% of what they were nine years ago.

Amazon will point out that their total payments have increased considerably. Obviously from the math, pages read have increased even more. I assume the growth has been driven largely by the growth in KU membership rather than in the average number of books read per user. Amazon keeps those statistics to themselves, and they alone determine the payout rates. There are no independent auditors making sure things are fair.

They’ve taken a 7% hit; authors have taken a 40% hit. Explain to any author how that is fair.

The 35%/70% royalty payment rate disaster.

Let’s move to how KDP pays authors for eBooks they sell. In the middle of 2010, Amazon unilaterally decided to pay 70% royalties on ebooks, BUT ONLY those priced between $2.99 and $9.99 inclusive. The number of pages in the book doesn’t matter, only the list price. Whether the book has illustrations is irrelevant. I’ve blogged in the past why there is no economic justification for this prejudice against lower and higher priced books. But even if there were, nearly fourteen years have passed. In inflation-adjusted dollars, the range should now be $3.85 to $12.89, but the range has not changed.

Even worse, the range for the US and Canadian markets is the same $2.99 to $9.99. The problem is C$9.99 is worth only US$7.45. And it’s not like Amazon can’t create different ranges for different currencies. For books sold in the Australia Amazon market, the top of the range to receive 70% is AU$11.99 (which converts to US$7.89). Picky? Yes. Frustrating that they don’t even consistently apply their insane rules? You betcha.

How KDP handles free books

KDP won’t allow authors to list free books. (As a “perk” of joining Kindle Select, they allow you to list them for free for five days out of the 90-day commitment.) What Amazon will do is allow anyone (including the author) to report lower prices on other markets. They’ll confirm the price is lower and then match. This is a labor-intensive task.

I have listed for free the first book in my Seamus McCree series, Ant Farm, on Google, Kobo, etc. Every Wednesday I check to see if Amazon still lists Ant Farm for free on each of their country-specific stores. I’d guess four out of five weeks at least one market has stopped price matching and returned to posting the list price. I write KDP an email, give them the Google and Kobo links to the affected markets to demonstrate they are free elsewhere. They always revert the price to $0.00.

My suggestion for a better way

When I sell a book on Amazon, they reduce my 70% royalty by a small delivery charge. For my novels that runs $0.06 to $0.08. For my three-book boxed sets, it runs $0.13 or $0.14. Why don’t they allow authors to list their books for free and invoice them with the delivery charge? They can set up payment systems the same as they do when an author places ads in the Amazon marketplace. Amazon makes more money. It doesn’t have to expand staff to check competitor prices and manually adjust the sales price, and I don’t have to spend five minutes every Wednesday determining which books I have to rattle their cages about.

Alrighty, then. I feel better now that I have expressed my dissatisfaction. I’ll crawl back into my cave and prepare for the launch of my next book (Hijacked Legacy—Seamus McCree #8, releasing 4/22/24).

What do you think? Are my complaints legit or . . . well, you can complete that sentence in the comments.

* * * * *

James M. Jackson authors the Seamus McCree series. Full of mystery and suspense, these thrillers explore financial crimes, family relationships, and what happens when they mix. To learn more information about Jim and his books, check out his website, https://jamesmjackson.com. You can sign up for his newsletter (and get to read a free Seamus McCree short story).



[i] I used CPI-all urban consumers, but any index would work

Wednesday, September 21, 2022

An Interview with author Lori Roberts Herbst by E. B. Davis

“It is only those who doubt who cannot see.”

Lori Roberts Herbst, Photo Finished, Kindle Loc. 3313

 

When a visit to a Colorado dude ranch turns deadly, it's up to photographer Callie Cassidy to corral the killer...

As maid of honor (aka grande dame) in her best friend's upcoming wedding, Callie wants to plan the perfect bridal shower. And what could be better than a girls' trip with their posse of friends?

The women jump at the idea and suggest a destination—Moonglow Ranch, a serenity retreat-slash-dude ranch owned by one friend's aunt and uncle.

When they arrive, Callie is less than enthusiastic. Serenity doesn't come easily to a former investigative photojournalist. Plus, her horse is stubborn as...well, a mule. She's warned to be on the lookout for snakes. Worst of all—gasp!—Moonglow only serves healthy food. Still, her friends are having a great time, and even Callie's golden retriever Woody and tabby cat Carl seem right at home on the ranch. For their sake, she tries to tap into her inner Zen.

Then the conniving wife of the town's most powerful man interrupts the party and threatens the ranch's proprietors. Callie worries the trip is destined for disaster.

Later, Callie finds the woman's body in the stable, apparently trampled by a horse. Or did she die from a snakebite? Or—as Callie suspects—could something even more sinister be at work?

Answers are as difficult to find as a needle in the haystack. And when the police chief accuses the ranch owners of murder, Callie realizes she'll need to lasso the real outlaw—before the wrong people end up in the pokey.

Amazon.com

 

Photo Finished is the fourth book in the Callie Cassidy mystery series. How I wish it were the first! Reading a series out of order frustrates me to no end, and I hope my questions don’t have too many roots in previous books. But this series is on Kindle Unlimited so I have no excuse for not catching up, at least for the next in series. Unfortunately, I didn’t have time for this interview.  

Lori and my short stories were in the anthology, The Fish That Got Away. I’m pleased to be able to introduce Lori’s long fiction to our readers. Lori starts blogging with us at WWK on September 29th. Please drop in and give Lori a warm welcome!         E. B. Davis

 

Before we discuss Photo Finished, why did you decide to self-publish? Did winning a Silver Falchion and Chanticleer Awards give you enough confidence to go it alone?

 

Though the awards definitely boosted my confidence, they actually came after I'd begun self-publishing. I was in my late 50s when I finished the first book in the series, and I simply wasn't patient enough to take the traditional route. (Plus, I'm a bit of a control freak...) As a former journalism teacher, I had a strong background in writing, publishing, and marketing, so I figured I'd be able to learn what I needed to know to make it work. There's been a lot to learn, certainly, but no regrets. I've discovered so many supportive people and wonderful resources along the journey.

 

Main character Callie and her best friend, Tonya, are in their mid-forties. Is this Tonya’s first marriage?

 

Yes. Neither of the friends has ever been married.

 

Bridal showers used to be a few hours on a weekend afternoon. Tonya is having a bridal shower week. I was surprised the mothers came along—at least the main character, Callie’s, and by mistake, Tonya’s mother. Why don’t Tonya and her mother get along? How many times has her mother, Lydia, been married?

 

It was Callie's goal to create a non-typical celebration for her friend. In the last book, the two of them went through a bit of a rough patch, so Callie feels compelled to show Tonya how much she means to her. Maggie Cassidy, Callie's mom, has always been very close to Tonya, so Tonya would naturally want her present at such a meaningful event. Lydia, on the other hand, has never successfully formed such a bond with her daughter. I think Lydia loves Tonya to the best of her ability, but she struggles with self-esteem issues and a touch of narcissism. She's been married—and divorced—three times, all in a quest to find a man to make her "whole." Tonya can't understand or relate to that.

Why does Tonya, a lifelong friend of Callie, call her “sugarplum” at times? Is this a reference to Callie’s weight?

 

Oh, no, not at all. It's a term of endearment. Throughout the series, Tonya calls Callie by little pet names, and her favorite happens to be "sugarplum."

 

Summer can be annoying. Her comments can inflame rather than soothe. And at times, she demands like a child, even if on behalf of her aunt and uncle who own the dude ranch. Why doesn’t anyone comment on her behavior, especially her wife, Jessica?

 

As an author, it's so interesting how differently readers can perceive characters—from other readers and even from my perspective as their creator. As a yoga and meditation instructor, Summer is usually quite chill—though from time to time she carries an edge about her. In this book, she's especially protective of her aunt, whom she adores. She feels an overwhelming desire to "fix it," and when she can't, that sense of powerlessness elicits a frustration she can't meditate her way out of.

 

The healthy food served at the Moonglow Ranch actually sounded good, even if Callie is more of a burger girl. But I was baffled by what a Chinese custard tart would be. Is there a difference between regular old custard and Chinese custard?

 

A Chinese custard tart is made using Chinese puff pastry. I'm not a chef (though I do microwave a mean Lean Cuisine), but I'm told the pastry is less oily than Western versions and has a more floury texture. They're often served in dim sum restaurants.

I know there are donkey sanctuaries, but are there sanctuaries for old racehorses, too?

 

Sure! They're all over the world. Moonglow Ranch isn't a racehorse sanctuary, per se, but Amaryllis has a passion for saving the animals from the fate that might await them once they're no longer useful.

 

Carmen gives psychic readings, but she calls herself a healer. She seems like the real deal, since she knew something about Tonya that even Callie didn’t know. Is she a sham or the real deal?

 

Hmm...I think readers will need to come to their own conclusions about that. The jury's still out. (Hint: she may show up in a future book.)

 

"…I turned my attention to the cat, taking a moment to fill him in

on the police chief’s antics. He pretended to be disinterested, but I could see

from his twitching whiskers he was listening intently.”

Kindle Loc. 774

 

Does Callie have a special relationship with her “creatures,” as she calls them? Why does she call them that, and can she communicate with them in a more sophisticated way than humans usually do with dogs and cats? It seems almost paranormal.

 

Perhaps it's projection on my part, but I've looked into the eyes of my pets and believed they understood my thoughts and emotions. I think many of us who live with dogs and cats experience the same phenomenon. Callie calls Woody and Carl "creatures" because she doesn't want the relationship defined with her as their "owner." To her, they are a family, each holding the same value. Are the golden retriever and tabby cat a bit...exceptional? Perhaps. Or maybe all creatures are exceptional if we had the awareness to see it. (Then again, I'm remembering a certain dog who spent fifteen minutes barking at his own shadow...)

 

Did you purposely name Colby after a cheese?

 

Ha! No, the truth is even "cheesier." I'm a long-time fan of the reality show Survivor. One of my all-time favorite contestants was Colby Donaldson, from the Australian Outback season. He always gave off a cowboy vibe, so the name just came to me.

  

Why do Tonya and Callie call themselves “sisters in insensitivity?”

 

As journalists, the two of them have developed a somewhat tough veneer. They both hold a bit of a cynical worldview, and it's nice for them to turn to each other for an understanding of that.

 

Mrs. Finney is an interesting character. How did they find out she was former CIA? Does she always use a fake British accent?

 

Mrs. Finney's CIA background came to light in book 1, Suitable for Framing, but I won't say much more about that for those who haven't read it yet. I will say that when I started the series, I didn't intend Mrs. Finney to be a returning character, but I just fell in love with her, as did the people of Rock Creek Village.

Why do Callie and Tonya call their mothers by their first names?

 

Callie calls her mother "Mom." Maggie is a loving, nurturing woman and has earned the moniker. Tonya has never had that type of relationship with her own mother. Since she doesn't feel that bond, she refers to her mother by her first name. It's a way of maintaining a distance.

 

Are scrambled egg whites any good, even if lathered with salsa?

 

I like them—especially with mushrooms, onions, tomatoes, and a pat of butter! Oh, and cheese... (there goes the health food aspect).

 

Callie uses visualization to test her different suspect inquiries. How does that help her investigation?

 

Callie spent twenty-five years as an investigative photojournalist, so she's trained in interpreting the details of a visual scene. She knows what makes sense and what doesn't. If she can't make a hypothetical scenario work in her brain, it's a good bet it wouldn't work in real life.

 

I was surprised by Callie’s lack of place setting knowledge. Her mother seems knowledgeable and would have taught her. Callie was an award-winning photojournalist—one would think she would have a bit more sophistication. Why doesn’t she know an appetizer plate from a dessert plate, a dinner fork from a dessert spoon? Why would Tonya have more acumen?

 

One of Callie's character flaws has always been the unwillingness to invest much time or energy in things that don't seem important to her. As an investigative photojournalist, she was more apt to be found in a war zone than a banquet room, so she never cared much for formalities. For Tonya, social niceties hold more interest, as evidenced by her love of fashion.

 

Why is it that even when we disbelieve in magic/psychic skills, like Callie, we still want to believe? Does it have something to do with faith?

 

What a thought-provoking question! Perhaps it is an human quality to desire answers, to want everything to make sense and fall into place. If someone can claim to hold that power, we long to believe them. It's like reading a good mystery—there's just a sense of satisfaction knowing that everything will be wrapped up by the end.

 

Callie hired two social influencers, whom she gives credit for boosting her business. Do they really help? Is there data?

 

Absolutely! And yes, there's substantial data to back it up. The main article I used for my research was in Forbes. The right social influencers can steer their audience toward certain businesses.

 

Are there studies showing that fish experience physical and emotional pain when caught?

 

Well, you'll find differing opinions on this. Most scientists agree fish don't possess the capacity to experience emotional pain in the same way as humans. But physical pain is a different story. Fish have neuroreceptors that react to painful stimuli, but their perception of that pain is open for debate.

 

Do you think people project qualities, both good and bad, on people that they want to see in them whether or not true?

 

For me, there's no a doubt about that. I've always been fascinated with the tendency toward confirmation bias, in which we search out information with the specific goal of supporting our pre-held opinions, rather than forming our opinions based on a wide scope of information. That applies to our views of other people, too, I think. I've watched enough Dateline that it no longer surprises me when someone says of a serial killer, "Well, he was always nice to me."

 

What’s next for Callie and the gang?

 

I'm in the very early stages of Book 5, tentatively titled Negative Reaction. The gang will be back in Rock Creek Village, where someone ends up poisoned with darkroom chemicals. Details to follow!