“There is no excuse for it. I was wrong.” So said former
Rutgers basketball coach Mike Rice in his apology speech before cameras.
Most people who have watched the video of Rice
abusing his players agree that he was wrong. He was wrong to push players
around. He was wrong to throw basketballs at them. He was wrong to use
homophobic slurs.
Not everyone agrees. At least one commentator on Fox
took the stance that coaches use such physical and emotional violence to toughen
up players; no harm was intended or done.
When the Athletic Director, Tim Pernetti, saw the videotape
he agreed it was wrong and suspended the coach for three games (pay forfeited)
and fined Rice an additional $50,000. It was a “first offense” and Rice was to
receive counseling during his suspension. Implicit in Pernetti’s decision was
that Rice’s behavior was not sufficient to warrant terminating his contract.
The reaction of the players recorded on the videotape to
Rice’s abuse was telling. They did not act surprised, angered or cowed at the
abuse. Why? My assumption is they were inured to it. This was no first time
offense, it was habitual behavior.
Once the video went viral the university fired Rice and a
couple of days later fired Pernetti. An assistant basketball coach and
university lawyer have also resigned.
Why did the public release of the very same video Rutgers
was provided in November 2012 now lead to Rice’s termination in April 2013?
Apparently only because that’s when the allegations of misconduct became widely known.
Pernetti did not immediately indicate upon its release that he had erred in his
earlier judgment to suspend rather than terminate Rice. No, he justified his
actions.
Which means he too showed insufficient judgment to represent
the university and had to go. According to at least one
source, one of the Board of Trustees also saw the video in November. If, as
has been reported, an outside director requested the president see the video,
and the president decided it was not important enough to spend his precious
time, the president too should resign. After all, the entire video is only
thirty minutes long and the president was quoted as saying, “it took me five
minutes” to decide to fire Mr. Rice.
If the Trustee did not continue to work to have Rice
terminated; if he stopped when he met the presidential stone wall, he too
should resign. I have no clue who else at the university saw the video before
its viral release, but if they had any authority over the situation, they
should also resign.
As reported
in the New York Times, the university’s legal investigation focused on the
technical question of whether there was a “hostile working environment.” They
concluded it did not meet the legal definition. The problem with asking lawyers
a narrow question is that you get a narrow answer.
The highest priority for any school should be the protection
of its students. There should be zero tolerance for the kind of behavior
demonstrated on the video and zero tolerance for those who cover it up.
~ Jim
I think that what happened at Penn State has positively effected sports. The tolerance level is down for abuse. But I suspect, like so much in our society, it's just a reaction. Whatever happened to 55 saves lives? Most of 95 has posted speed limits of 70. I think it's all politics and liability insurance. CYA. If someone is convicted, everyone is "concerned." But if someone gets away with it, a blind eye is turned until they are forced to pony up. Five years ago no one would have said a word.
ReplyDeleteIf a bully can get away with it, the bullying continues so someone has to whistle-blow to stop the abuse. It's especially bad when it happens to young people but it also happens at work. Then people are afraid of losing their jobs. Surely many people know a petty authority who holds back on needed supplies or doctors performance evaluations to enforce his/her own agenda?
ReplyDeleteYou're absolutely right, Jim. But athletics, athletic directors, and coaches rule on campuses today. Frequently, the athletic director (and sometimes the coach) makes more than even the president or chancellor.
ReplyDeleteThanks for bringing this up. Sports have their own rules, sort of like Congress. Most people involved don't want to be judged by "outsiders."
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you wrote this. Point well made.
ReplyDeleteI agree. I've seen this type of behavior even in kid sports with youngsters elementary school age both with Little League coaches and the gym teachers. I think it sets up the tolerance for later grades and college sports to think it's normal and necessary for coaches to act like that to have a good team. At least for those, who might have been good at certain sports later if they hadn't been turned off earlier by the behavior of screaming and belittling coaches.
ReplyDelete