For the past few
months, I’ve contemplated an idea for a short story. But now I’m not sure if
it’s a short story or a novel. After changing my victim, my killer and then my
plot, I started dithering about its length, whether or not I could do justice
to the story via the short story format. But then, without doing enormous
amounts of research, how can I know if I have enough material for a novel? In
changing the plot, I increased the tension and outrage the reader would feel.
Not that that factor required changing the length, but the mitigating factor
now pivotal to the plot is a legal concept of international concern. In short,
when I changed the plot the scope of the short may have expanded enough to
warrant a novel length story.
At its core, it’s still the same story only more complex.
The setting is the same and the relationships are the same. The background is
real within the historical context. I’ve never written historical. Can I write
historical even if the story is set in the 1970s, the era of my college years?
But I still must do a lot of research because if I turn it into a novel,
everything that I intended to write in the short story version would be
detailed and expanded. More secondary characters must be developed and, at this
point, I’m not sure what their function would be in the story.
Research is essential because I’m fallible and I’m not
omniscient. I need to go beyond my own POV not only because of my four
characters, but also because of the era’s politics, which play a role in the
plot and character development of one of the characters. But then again, I
don’t want to overplay the politics because although it is a factor, it’s only
one factor. Unfortunately, I’ve been known to do too much research. As little
research as I’ve done, I find myself going down memory lane to the social
events and names of the era.
And yet I know that research doesn’t make the story. Sometimes
it detracts from the story. I have enough details to make the short story
interesting, but with more research increasing the details would the story hold
up if lengthened?
How do you decide whether the story is a short or a novel?
I've turned a short into a novel twice so far and working on a third. The way I decide is if I like the short and the characters. That's pretty well it. Of course, there's always a point at which I say, "This is impossible. I should have left it as a short. But then I come up with a solution to fix the problem.
ReplyDeleteThanks for letting me know. I do like my plot and characters--did you publish the short first, then expand it to a novel? If so, did it bother publishers that the short could have spoiled the novel?
ReplyDeleteSeveral authors write shorts from their novels. I think much depends on whether you'll stay interested in the main characters through several reviews. Also, although research shouldn't be ignored, the 1970's isn't that long ago in historical terms. Readers or their parents could have lived through that decade. The details that you remember and the flavor of the decade would add the most interest and depth.
ReplyDeleteYes! I think a lot of readers would remember that era. One of my friends that read the short said it took her back and as she read, she remembered all the streets and venues that I mentioned. I've never written historical before, and I enjoyed it--perhaps going overboard on historic details. It was fun, although it took much more time. They say, write what you know--been there, done that!
ReplyDeleteYour concept sounds like it would support a novel. Complexity usually does not work well in short stories. You could try it as a short story first and see how it works, but if you want more depth, you need more length.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Warren. Complexity is the key: too much of it and you end up with a muddled story that probably belongs as a novella or novel.
ReplyDeleteNot enough and you have a boring longer work with a dragging middle.
Good luck on your decision.
~ Jim
The present story is set in 1975-79, but if I made it into a novel, I'd have a 2012 story that parallels the historic one. Since my main character has knowledge and experience based on the old plot, it furthers her investigation of the present day plot. Sound like a plan?
ReplyDeleteAlthough I asked our anonymous guest about publishing the short story, what do the rest of you think? Will publishing the short spoil the novel?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like you have enough of a plot to support a novel. One of the problems with short stories is you don't have enough room to develop the characters and plot satisfactorily, in my opinion, and I write both. I like the idea of a parallel 2012 story. It should keep the interest going. If you did that, I don't see why you couldn't publish the short story - either from the earlier era or the 2012 time.
Thanks, Gloria. I think it may work. I'll give it a go!
ReplyDelete