Wednesday, September 2, 2026

The Layers of Revising

by Maddie Day/Edith Maxwell

I’m beginning the last month of revising my 41st mystery, due October 1, so I thought I’d talk about what that whole process is like for me.

All writers know that finishing the first draft is only the beginning. I plot very little, and I like to charge through the first draft and get the story onto the page. To that end, I leave lots of notes to myself in square brackets throughout the manuscript to check for facts, for research, for consistency with earlier books in the series. My first revision pass is going through and resolving all those.




Then I do passes for plot holes, sometimes writing several new scenes to flesh out an idea or a subplot. I go through the book checking each scene for hooks at the start and end. I make another pass to make sure I have brought in all the senses, but only in the service of the story. I print out the book and read straight through, marking up whatever I notice, then I put in all my green-in self-edits. I see things so differently on paper than on the screen. For me, this is a valuable and necessary step.

I check for elegant language, again only in the service of the story, and make sure any descriptions of people relate to who they really are. And I run a spelling and grammar check.

All that happened a month ago. When the book is as polished as it can be – or when my eyes glaze over as I’m looking at it – I send it off to an excellent independent editor (Amy in Wisconsin).

She returns it with changes and suggestions marked in Track Changes, and she also includes an editorial letter. The letter includes all the hard stuff: “We need more about what happened to Bella.” “We need more about the beef between Stu and Rick.” “Deanna feels a bit underutilized.” “We need more interaction with the Broads and Michelle.” And so on. Amy asks questions and sometimes makes suggestions on how to implement the comment. 




My process is first to go through the Track Changes stuff. I work in Scrivener, so I have the Word document open next to my Scrivener project for the book. As I go, I knock off all the easy fixes, things like the wrong name, adding missing quotation marks, clarifying language, and other bits.

Then I take a deep breath and start addressing the harder edits. What was Rick’s reason for being angry, anyway? I have no idea, but I either have to come up with one or change/remove the scene where he’s irate. And on and on.

What I’ll be doing in the next month is the hardest part of the whole process. The book is done. I’m ready to move on to the next one. Any big changes I make can ripple through the story. I often have to dig deep to figure out how to address each issue. 

I’m sure it’s hard partly because I didn’t do this work before I started writing, as some authors do. I know my protagonist pretty well, but I might not have spent enough time getting acquainted with my villains and other major cast characters. This particular book, Ruthie Drew Cleans Up, is also the first in a new series, so it’s necessary work.

But I can do it. I have a month left before the due date, and except for a few quick family visits (occasional Grammy day care with my grandgirl, which I love), I don’t have any travel or book events scheduled for September. I know I can meet my deadline by showing up for work every day by seven.

After I turn in the book to my Kensington Publishing editor, I might receive a few high-level comments from him, but for some books he simply writes, “It looks great. No changes needed. I’ve put through the payment.” Yay! A few months later I’ll get copyedits, and sometime after that proof pages to pore over and make last-chance tiny fixes (but nothing that would cause page numbers to change).

I go through this process for every book I write. It happened a year ago for my new book, Murder at the Toy Soldier.Despite all these passes and eyeballs on the manuscript, someone (often my keen-eyed sister in Ottawa) invariably reports a typo or a consistency error. Gah. I’m grateful my editor is willing to make the change in the ebook and in the next printing. I haven’t heard of any errors yet for the new book, which released last week. Fingers crossed!



Readers: Do you report errors in books to the author? Authors, how do you feel about being notified of a flaw in your beloved book that you worked so hard on? Is your editing process appreciably different from mine?

Murder at the Toy Soldier: Cape Cod bike shop owner Mac Almeida is extra busy during a cold, wet February as she and Tim do their best as working parents of a preschooler and a baby. With Ella’s fourth birthday approaching, Mac uses her lunch break to shop for a gift at the Toy Soldier. Behind the counter is Zia Carven, a young woman Mac recognizes. Mac finds a gift Ella will love and Zia offers to gift wrap it. Mac plans to pick it up after work, but when she returns, she finds Zia slumped over the counter, dead, with dried blood on a toy rifle nearby. 

Mac’s mother, Astra, confides that she’d been trying to help Zia, and now the police want to speak with her, which worries Mac. Then Mac discovers that Zia had been in town searching for her birth mother, which only multiplies the questions—and the suspects. One thing is certain: Mac and the Cozy Capers book group will have to double down to find a killer who isn’t playing around . . .




Maddie Day writes the Cozy Capers Book Group Mysteries, the Cece Barton Mysteries, and the Dot and Amelia Mysteries. As Agatha-Award winning Edith Maxwell, she writes Agatha Award-winning historical mysteries and Agatha-nominated short crime fiction. She’s a member of MWA and a proud lifetime member of Sisters in Crime. Day/Maxwell lives north of Boston with her beau and their cat Martin, where she writes, cooks, gardens, wastes time on Facebook, and delights in Grammy duties. Find Edith and Maddie at mysteryloverskitchen.com and at edithmaxwell.com.

14 comments:

  1. Thanks, Edith, for visiting us at Writers Who Kill and giving us a peek at your process.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Love your process... get it on paper and clean it up...yet, without drafting a million page outline to get you to 41 books. Congrats! on those published and in the pipeline to get to 41.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I appreciate when readers report typos. And despite numerous eyes on the manuscript, sometimes one slips through. I hate those suckers and as an Indie author, as soon as I know one exists I change my ebook and paperback so no future buyers will see it.

    My revision process is similar, other than at the point I have editor suggestions in Word revision, I switch from Scrivener to Word and stay there until the project is complete.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wouldn’t report any errors to an author since I know that by the time I read the book it is too late to make corrections.
    I also know that most authors have a number of people who are diligent about checking for inconsistencies or grammatical mistakes so it is not necessarily lack of attention to details.
    I can overlook some grammatical mistakes although if it occurs throughout a book I wonder if the writer just doesn’t realize what the correct term/usage/spelling, etc is supposed to be
    The one problem I cannot accept is poor research or lack of knowledge about a major event or person
    If you are using real people or historical events that actually occurred you need to be more accurate in the way the information is presented or explain why you “rearranged” the facts.
    The example I always refer to is when a real, very well known person was referred to as being in a place at a certain time, i.e. year.
    The problem is that in real life he had died five years earlier.
    Since he was an internationally known musician the author should have been aware of this.
    To me, this indicated inadequate research or information about the time period.
    It affected my reading of the book because I felt if such a major mistake occurred I could no longer continue with the story because I did not trust the author and I have not read anything else she has written.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome back, Edith. We’ve missed you. Wonderful blog. My process is very similar to yours. As to errors, I tend not to report them to the author unless I know their publisher will make the changes. As an indie author, I appreciate hearing about errors from readers. I can fix them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I am lucky that my Kensington editor is open to fixing them where possible.

      Delete
  6. Very thorough! I'm in the middle of a second revision, so your insights are helpful and came at the perfect time!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad to hear it!

      Delete
    2. The previous comment was from Edith, not anonymous.

      Delete