Guest Post by Jennifer Sadera
My husband has a cool job. He
creates unique spaces for museum exhibits in New York City. Among my favorite
of his projects over the years are: The Costume Institute and Karl Lagerfeld
exhibit at The Metropolitan Museum of Art; the live-plant-wall project in the
main entrance at Lincoln Center; the Tiffany Gallery in New York Historical
Society; and the Anne Frank exhibit at Center for Jewish History. A bonus for
me: attending the openings of all these exhibits.
At these events I meet some of
New York’s movers and shakers and conversations are usually interesting.
Inevitably, discussion pivots to what I do. When I explain I’m an author, most
people are intrigued and ask a lot of questions, but every so often people
declare that they, too, could write a book. At this point I paste on a smile
and try to look interested as the person before me launches into a fifteen-minute
oral dissertation of the book’s premise, plotline, characters, and theme. When
I ask them how far along they are in the writing process, the answer is usually
a head shake and admission that they haven’t actually begun writing.
This always makes me grit my
teeth. Honestly, if you tell me you’re a lawyer, a doctor, an exterminator, or
nearly any other job on the planet, it’s highly unlikely I will pipe in with,
“Oh, I could do that.” I could not do those jobs because I am a writer. That is
my job, and it’s not as easy as it looks. Trust me. I started writing at age eight.
My dad was my first editor and critic (thankfully he was not critical!), which
gave me the curiosity to learn all that I could about writing. After college, I
worked on the staffs of Woman’s World, Beauty, and Redbook
magazines. When both my children were diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes, and I
needed to be near them to manage their condition, I ditched New York City and began
a freelance writing business in my home. I can trace the evolution of my
writing style through the hundreds of clips from the magazines, newspapers, and
other periodicals I contributed to over many years. And still, I
was offered my first contract by a traditional publisher only after writing six
books over 12 years. And I’m one of the lucky ones.
People know this. Powerful people
like Mark Zuckerberg. He doesn’t have time (and probably not the talent since
he is not a writer) to create the millions of books he needs to train AI and
give his company, Meta, an advantage over the competition. But this is apparently
no problem. He allegedly took our books without offering compensation or
even asking for permission, wiped the copyrights, and has turned the world’s
best writers into teachers for their replacements.
How can this be, you may wonder.
Copyrights protect a writer’s intellectual property . . . until a trillion-dollar
company decides to disregard laws. It can afford to. As intimated in a recent
article in the Atlantic, it’s cheaper to compensate for the pirated
intellectual property of more than 7 million writers than fall behind in the worldwide
AI race. Strange set of priorities, don’t you think? Who is he protecting?
Certainly, not the right to create.
There’s a saying that those who
create don’t destroy, but what about those who steal creations? I assert that destruction
of artists and livelihoods—already a struggle—can be the only outcome. He’s
literally stealing from those who can least afford it. There’s a reason most of
us creatives fall into the “struggling artist” category.
The Authors Guild is on top of
this issue with a class-action lawsuit underway. If you think your writing was
pirated, you can search the Library Genesis database (www.libgen.is/fiction), which lists all
books from “publicly available internet sources.” Simply type your name into
their search bar. If your book comes up, as mine did, your work has been stolen
for the use of training AI.
Let’s face it, artists of all
types—writers, photographers, and painters to name a few—are the low-hanging
fruit in this situation. Our work is easy to access and ripe for the picking if
the plunderer can afford to disregard the law and settle their debts at a later
time—once they rake in the trillions from their AI victory. We are the David to
Zuckerberg’s Goliath. But we know how that battle ended, don’t we? Reach out to
the Authors Guild and find out what action you can take to keep our collective
intellectual property protected.
But for now, I’d love to hear different
perspectives. What do you think, is there an upside to using AI in this
capacity? How might AI help our writing community?
Jennifer Sadera is the author of the recently released domestic suspense I KNOW SHE WAS THERE (CamCat Books). Her writing has earned her multiple awards at Atlanta Writers conferences and a fellowship at Martha’s Vineyard Institute of Creative Writing. A former staffer on Woman’s World and Redbook magazines, she now contributes to ITW’s The Big Thrill and is a finalist for Chronogram magazine’s top author of the Hudson Valley, New York, where she lives. She is a proud member of ITW, MWA, and SINC.
I was recently asked about AI at a book event. It's a tricky topic. I'm sure it can be used as a tool for the marketing side of the business, but I'm choosing to stay as far away from it as I can. And yes, the majority of my books are on that pirate site. It's frustrating, to put it lightly.
ReplyDeleteAuthors join musicians and artists in this dilemma. When does publicly disseminated content--aural, visual, written--enter the public domain? What constitutes fair use? Can I record a favorite song off the radio for private enjoyment? Can I put a copy of a "just right" political cartoon on my Facebook page? Then there's inventions and innovations. The whole issue of copyright, patents, and fair use is in flux. Who knows where we we land when (and if) the courts rule definitively on these knotty issues?
ReplyDeleteExcellent post. Piracy is piracy no matter what they call it or how they try to justify it. As for the benefits of AI for the writing community. They are few. Spelling and grammar checkers qualify as useful and, to the best of my knowledge, are not harvesting words. That could change, of course. Stand by.
ReplyDeleteAlthough there are times for AI usage in writing (spell check, etc), a full use of it leaves something to be desired - human input.
ReplyDelete