If you are interested in blogging or want to promote your book, please contact E. B. Davis at writerswhokill@gmail.com.


February Interviews













2/5 Heather Weidner, Glitter, Glam, and Contraband
2/12 Rhys Bowen, Above The Bay of Angels
2/19 Elizabeth Penney, Hems & Homicide
2/26 Annette Dashofy, Under The Radar


Saturday Guest Bloggers:
2/1 Valerie Burns
2/8 Jeannette de Beauvoir
2/15 Kathryn Lane

WWK Bloggers: 2/22 Kait Carson, 1/28 & 1/29 Special Interviews with Agatha Nominees by Paula Gail Benson

*************************************************************************

WWK is proud of our four Agatha nominees. Kaye George for Best Short Story--not her first time to be nominated, Connie Berry and Grace Topping for Best First Mystery Novel (wish they weren't having to compete against each other), and Annette Dashofy for Best Contemporary Novel--her fifth nomination!


Congratulations to our writers for the following publications:

Look for Kaye George and Margaret S. Hamilton's short stories in the new Mid-Century Murder by Darkhouse Books. Kaye's story is "Life and Death on the Road" and Margaret's story is titled "4BR/3.5BA Contemporary."


Kaye George's first novel in the Vintage Sweets mystery series, Revenge is Sweet, will be released on March 10th. Look for the interview here on March 11.


Grace Topping's second novel in Laura Bishop staging series, Staging Wars, will be released by Henery Press on April 28th. Look for the interview here on April 29th.


Don't miss Shari Randall's "The Queen of Christmas" available on at Amazon. Shari's holiday story for WWK was too long so she published it for our enjoyment. It's available for 99 cents or on Kindle Unlimited for free!


KM Rockwood's "The Society" and "To Die A Free Man; the Story of Joseph Bowers" are included in the BOULD Awards Anthology, which was released on November 19. KM won second place with a cash prize for "The Society." Congratulations, KM! Kaye George's "Meeting on the Funicular" is also in this anthology, which can be bought for 99 cents on Kindle until November 30.


Paula Gail Benson's story "Wisest, Swiftest, Kindest" appears in Love in the Lowcountry an anthology by the Lowcountry Romance Writers available 11/5 in e-book and print format on Amazon. The anthology includes fourteen stories all based in Charleston, South Carolina.


Kaye George's "Grist for the Mill" was published in A Murder of Crows anthology, edited by Sandra Murphy on October 9th.



Shari Randall will be writing again for St. Martin's, perhaps under a pseudonym. We look forward to reading Shari's Ice Cream Shop Mystery series debuting next year. Congratulations, Shari!

Susan Van Kirk's A Death At Tippett Pond was released on June 15th. Read E. B. Davis's interview with Susan.

Warren Bull's Abraham Lincoln: Seldom Told Stories was released. It is available at: GoRead: https://www.goread.com/book/abraham-lincoln-seldom-told-stories or at Amazon: https://tinyurl.com/ydaklx8p

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, January 10, 2011

How Much Explanation for the Reader?

I grew up before the years of music videos, and now resent when I see one that distorts my imagery of the music and verse. When James Montgomery Jackson posed the question of how much description a writer should provide readers, I definitively sided with less is more.

Detailed characterization can be left to the reader’s imagination unless some personal facet contributes to the plot, such as the obsessive-compulsive disorder of the character Monk, created by Andy Breckman. In Monk’s case, his disorder is so severe that when writer Lee Goldberg wrote novels using the character, he had no need to explain. Readers garner personal facets through the characters’ behavior, expressions, thoughts and speech, without the writer telling them. But there is another, similar dilemma a writer faces, a sticky wicket in which I stumble and fight over with editors. I’m unsure that there is a definitive answer. How much explanation should a writer provide to ensure that a reader “gets it?”

My solution has been to spell out my point to the reader, either through a character’s thoughts or through description provided by the protagonist. In doing so, I risk insulting the reader’s intelligence. Insulting people is so not my intention. To clarify a scene, I’ll add a line that fortifies a point, especially if a technical detail such as equipment or forensic tests of some kind are utilized in the scene, only to have it redlined by an editor as redundant. The problem is that when I don’t explain a given point or add that fortifying sentence, editors tell me to provide more explanation. The feeling of hitting my head against the wall never felt so real.

For example, in the last paragraph of the Christmas short story, "The Christmas Present," which I posted last month, my editor and I wrangled over the information I presented.


My mission seemed complete. Dimples met all the qualifications I had on my list, but the case and his lack of middle-age spread still made me suspicious. I decided to hang around, at least until Valentine’s Day. If Bernard doesn’t come through with a dozen red roses, I’ll perfect my skill with rubber bands.


My editor correctly stated that since the angel/late husband really didn’t do anything to complete the mission the first sentence was confusing. I left it as written because I wanted the reader to conclude that 1) the angel was deluding himself, or 2) God had a hand in the caper. Either conclusion the reader drew was acceptable to me. When I told the editor what I had decided, I was told that the angel should acknowledge his lack of influence on the romance or mention God’s hand in the romance. (Although the editor liked the ending and knew it somehow worked.)

By taking the editor’s advice, wouldn’t I have insulted the reader’s intelligence or impeded their own interpretation? In a situation where I normally over explain, and in this situation I felt virtuous in not spelling out the solution out to the reader, I was told to provide more explanation.

As a reader, does the writer explaining what meaning should be taken from a particular portion of the script insult you? Or are you reassured by definitiveness? As a writer, do you face the same dilemma and how do you avoid insulting the reader while satisfying editors? Do you feel damned if you do and damned if you don’t?

2 comments:

Warren Bull said...

Been there. Done that. I was in a writing class once when two people argued back and forth over meaning of a passage. Neither interpreted it the way I had intended. The teacher turned to me and asked, "Which way is it?" I answered, "Don't ask me. I just wrote it."

Pauline Alldred said...

If the ending works for the editor, I wouldn't worry about adding an extra sentence. Some people like to have everything nailed down with no possibility of ambiguity. I think life is often ambiguous.