If you are interested in blogging or want to promote your book, please contact E. B. Davis at writerswhokill@gmail.com

Our April author interviews: Perennial author Susan Wittig Albert--4/5, Sasscer Hill, horse racing insider--4/12, English historical, cozy author, TE Kinsey--4/19, Debut author, Susan Bickford--4/26.

Saturday Guest Bloggers in April: Heather Baker Weidner (4/1), Christina Hoag (4/8), Susan Boles (4/29). WWK Saturday bloggers write on 4/15--Margaret S. Hamilton and on 4/22--Kait Carson.

Congratulations to our writers for the following publications:

Warren Bull's new Lincoln mystery, Abraham Lincoln In Court & Campaign has been released. Look for the Kindle version on February 3.

Shari Randall's "Pets" will be included in Chesapeake Crimes: Fur, Feathers, and Felonies anthology, which will be published in 2018. In the same anthology "Rasputin," KM Rockwood's short story, will also be published. Her short story "Goldie" will be published in the Busted anthology, which will be released by Level Best Books on April 25th. In addition, our prolific KM will have the following shorts published as well: "Sight Unseen" in Fish Out of Water, Guppie (SinC) anthology, just released, and "Making Tracks" in Passport to Murder, Bouchercon anthology, October 2017.

Margaret S. Hamilton's short story, "Once a Kappa" was published as a finalist in the Southern Writer's Magazine annual short story contest issue. Mysterical-E published her "Double Crust Corpse" in the Fall 2016 issue. "Baby Killer" will appear in the 2017 solar eclipse anthology Day of the Dark to be published this summer prior to the eclipse in August.

Linda Rodriquez has two pending book publications. Plotting the Character-Driven Novel will be released by Scapegoat Press on November 29th. Every Family Doubt, the fourth Skeet Bannion mystery, is scheduled for release on June, 13, 2017. Look for E. B. Davis's interview with Linda here in June!

Cross Genre Publications anthology, Hidden Youth, will contain Warren Bull's "The Girl, The Devil, and The Coal Mine." The anthology will be released in late November 2016. The We've Been Trumped anthology released by Dark House Press on September 28th contains Warren Bull's "The Wall" short story and KM Rockwood's "A Phone Call to the White House." KM writes under the name Pat Anne Sirs for this volume.

James M. Jackson's 4th book in the Seamus McCree series, Doubtful Relations, is now available. His novella "Low Tide at Tybee" appears February 7 as part of Lowcountry Crimes: Four Novellas, which is available for order.


Friday, October 14, 2011

Writing Reviews

Writing Reviews

It’s not a surprise that reviews are frequently discussed on writing websites. Negative reviews can decrease sales and reputations. Positive reviews can increase them. There are more books coming out than anyone can read. Marketing and advertising, by publishers who do it at all, are generally reserved for books publishers believe have the potential to sell millions of copies.

I respect authors who reach the level of fame and success that readers will buy the next (fill in the name of the author.) I doubt I will ever be a member of that select group.

The rest of us depend on ourselves and on our readers for promotion. Reviewing books honestly and fairly leads indirectly to an atmosphere where all books, including mine, are more likely to be honestly and fairly reviewed.

I’ve been reading that reviews are for sale from certain sources. I’ve read reviews where the reviewer noted the excellence of the book and then rated it one out of a possible five stars, possibly misreading the instructions for rating. I’ve read scathing reviews where a reviewer “flames” an author.

None of that has happened to me but one reviewer described my Murder Manhattan Style title as “misleading” apparently because based on the title she imagined a different setting for the book. If you, “Can’t judge a book by its cover?” Should you judge it before reading it by its title? The review itself was quite positive, even flattering but it was down-rated due to the title.

All of this makes writing and receiving honest review even more crucial.

I’ve been working to improve my skill at reviewing. Here are a few observations.

Like anyone else I have my biases. Although I’ve read and truly enjoyed some romance and horror novels, they are not my favorite genres. Mix in strong elements of mystery and suspense and I’m more solidly in my comfort zone. I don’t personally refuse to review books outside my particular preferences, but in an effort to be fair to writer and reader I do concentrate on reviewing elements of the books I have more knowledge about and familiarity with.

As a mystery writer I am well aware of how hard it is to hide clues in plain sight, drag red herrings across the trail of the investigation and offer plausible but innocent suspects as alternates to the actual criminal. So when I write reviews I take particular care to leave clues, surprises and unexpected character traits unmentioned out of respect for the writer’s hard work and to enhance the reader’s enjoyment. It’s surprisingly easy to get enthused and to reveal information that would detract from the reader’s experience.

As a reviewer I am writing more to readers, than writers. Often in my blogs it is the other way around. I try to write less about techniques and more about the emotion the writing evoked. I try to give a sense of the story without telling a step-by-step synopsis.

As I learn more I hope to write more about it.

Do you write reviews? If so what do you try to do?


Earl Staggs said...

Warren, I write very few reviews. I consider them nonfiction and I'm a fiction writer. I also seldom read all of a review. When a reviewer gives a summary of the plat, I'll skip over it. I prefer to learn the plot page by page as I read the book. Usually, I'll read the first paragraph to see what kind of book it is. Then I'll skip to the last paragraph and hope the reviewer gives an opinion of the plot and the writing. That's all I really want to see.

Kevin R. Tipple said...

Give the facts, get them right, give no spoilers, and have a clean well written review.


LJ Roberts said...

Warren, I do write reviews and concur with everything you said. There are eight elements at which I look, when reviewing a book. I start with quoting the first sentence of the book just to give the reader a taste of the author's voice and then a very short summary of the plot--no spoilers--and then focus on the elements with a brief opinion at the end.

I find it easy to review books I've loved, and books I've really disliked. The hardest reviews are for books that are "good".

LJ Roberts - who recently blogged about "A Reviewer's Conundrum" at

Pauline Alldred said...

As a reader, I tend not to read reviews. When the emotional response of the reviewer comes through, I might over-respond to enthusiasm for or derogatory comments about a story.

There are two or three reviewers I've met and whose biases I know. I do sometimes consult their opinions of a new author.

Otherwise, I buy and read what attracts me, whether it's in good taste or not.

Carol Ann said...

I always struggle to write reviews. No longer do I feel obligated to write a summary because the reader can find that in the back page blurb. Why repeat it? Instead I focus on a short paragraph about how the characters and the plot touched my emotions.

Kevin R. Tipple said...

I always do a book summary because the jacket copy either tells too much OR has numerous factual errors.

I also wish I had a penny for every author who claimed in public that he or she never read reviews and then e-mailed me to ask about a review. I would be rich!

In other news, as part of Friday's Forgotten Books hosted by Patti Abbott, I review Beth Groundwater's first book, A REAL BASKET CASE, today on my blog at http://kevintipplescorner.blogspot.com/


jennymilch said...

There was a great post about Amazon reviews--their perils and pitfalls on The Thrill Begins yesterday...gonna try and post a link http://thethrillbegins.blogspot.com/

I rarely post reviews. I don't consider myself a reviewer. I mean, I'm not a reviewer. I'm a writer, and a reader, but not particularly articulate about why I like what I read. Every now and then if I know the writer I will write down a few sentences and give 5 stars. I hope this helps because as you say, so many writers are struggling to be recognized, even once published, these days.

I would propose a system that differentiates between professional reviews (those who do it for a living, or who do it frequently enough that it's a crying shame they *can't* do it for a living), reader reviews, and reader opinions (shorter, more subjective than a review).

I think this would both allow admiring friends and colleagues to draw attention to others' work, and maintain a badge of quality for reviews.

Kevin R. Tipple said...

That post that Jenny refers to seems to me nothing more than a rehashed anti Amazon deal that is common on the net.

As more and more review markets lay off staff and close, I think the chances of getting paid by legitimate markets is ending. I think the reading public is going to see more and more of these fraud deals where the author pays some bucks and gets glowing reviews put on Amazon, Goodreads and elsewhere.

I very much hope I am wrong.


Warren Bull said...

Earl, That's an interesting approach. I hate it when essential plot points are revealed in a review. I recently read a blurb that made it absolutely clear who the murderer was when I started the book.

Warren Bull said...

Kevin, Great advice from an experienced reviewer.

Warren Bull said...

Thanks, LJ, Right on and right to the point.

Diana said...

That is a very good clear article you've written Warren. I review quite often and I hate to write a bad review.
I am frequently asked to give a review for a mag I write for, and recently I received two novels, one which needed tightening up and editing so desperately, that I sent a forward report back to the promotions officer of the company who sent both books for review. I pointed out what the problems were with both, and gave examples of what the authors could do to fix them (one wasn't published) The promotions officer was NOT amused, but wouldn't you think she would be keen to have the author get them as best he could? :(

Warren Bull said...

Pauline, You're correct in a review it is easy to set high expectation. Other readers may not agree and dislike a book just because it did not their expectations.

Warren Bull said...

Carol Ann, That an interesting and totally valid approach. Goodreads requests that sort of review.

Warren Bull said...

Kevin, Thanks for the information. I read and trust your reviews.

Warren Bull said...


I did not review for a long time but there are so few reliable reviewers that I listened to a number of people i respect and started writing them. It is a very different skill than writing. We try to make WWK one source of dependable reviews. Thank yoi all the for imput.