Welcome Wednesday guests for September:
9/03 Beach-Read novelist, Mary Hogan (Two Sisters);
9/10 Fast-track Guppy Annette Dashofy (Lost Legacy);
9/17 Florida Coast author, Terrie Farley Moran (Well Read, Then Dead);
9/24 Cozy Confection author, Kathy Aarons (Death Is Like A Box Of Chocolates).


Gloria Alden's latest publication is nonfiction. Boys Will Be Boys: The Joys and Terrors of Raising Boys. Edited by Cher'ley Grogg was recently released and available on Amazon. Gloria wrote three essays and two poems in her chapter included in the book.


Don't miss next month's release of Chesapeake Crimes: Homicidal Holidays on October 7th, in which WWK bloggers Shari Randall ("Disco Donna") and E. B. Davis ("Compromised Circumstances") have short stories.


KM Rockwood's short stories will appear in two anthologies released in October. They are: "The Lure of the Owl" in Swamp Mansion and Other Dark Stories, to be released as a ebook, and "Aunt Olga and the Werewolf" will be included in the third Creatures, Crimes and Creativity anthology release by Intrigue Publishing. at their conference in October.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Thursday, January 13, 2011

HEROES AND FOOLS

CBTUD00Z

I’ve never forgotten the image of three men without food or heat shivering as wind ripped at their tiny tent, snow piled up at the tent’s exit, and nothing existed for miles except ice and snow. My parents acquired a copy of the movie, “Scott of the Antarctic” and I still feel the cold of that black and white journey. Somehow, Scott’s failure—he was beaten to the South Pole by Roald Amundsen, his preparations were inefficient, and he and his companions died—was more of a learning experience and had greater emotional impact than heroic stories of victorious soldiers and admirals. Also, I don’t mind pulling apart the on and off iconic status of a Brit.

Scott started his naval career at the age of thirteen. (My grandfather went to sea when he was fourteen). By the age of thirty, Scott was the sole support of his mother and sisters. Promotion in the navy was slow and he saw the command of his first Antarctic expedition as a career opportunity. Although dogs and skis were used for that expedition, Scott and his men knew little about them, and Scott doesn’t seem to have learned much by his second and fatal expedition. Roald Amundsen learned Arctic skills from native people in Canada. He used sled dogs and wore animal skins. During his journey, he killed some of his dogs so he and his men had fresh meat.

Although Scott had flaws and showed bravery and endurance during his journey, he didn’t have to go to the South Pole. Maybe he could be a literary hero but not a hero in a mystery. I remember watching MR900383632with my parents a movie about the conquest of Everest. At the end, my mom said, “The whole thing seems like a waste of energy and life to me. Why did they have to climb it?” My dad was annoyed by her response. Of course the men had to test themselves against the mountain in the same way as Francis Macomber had to shoot animals to prove his manhood in “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.”

As they plot, writers of mysteries think about stakes. As the protagonist faces more danger, so the stakes are raised. If protagonists don’t act bravely, they will face worse consequences. Is reader expectation due to our living at a different time? Surely foolhardy people still place themselves in danger for no good reason? What about sky divers or bungee jumpers? And then there’s adolescence when everyone is expected to behave rashly, hopefully without long-term consequences.

Today, we work hard to make our lives secure, risk-free, and insured. We call people heroes if they perform one brave action. We seem to search for heroes, even accepting avatars and comic book characters if we see no one else. Does fiction, and I’m including movies and television, provide us with the heroes we need and crave? How have antiheroes changed the way we see the main characters in fiction, characters like Scarlett O’Hara, Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment, Tom Ripley, Alexander Portnoy, Holden Caulfield, and Cal in East of Eden?

I think characters don’t have to be heroic in traditional terms but they have to unfold throughout a story and reveal themselves with all their motives, petty and grand, to reach memorable status. What makes a hero or heroine for you, whether in fiction or in life?

5 comments:

E. B. Davis said...

There are many ways to define a hero, Pauline. I don't think that time is a factor. We must judge a character in the context of the era.

What makes a hero? I'm always reminded of Rudyard Kipling's poem, "If," which applies to men and women, when measuring a hero. It's the courage, steadfastness, and conviction to be true to yourself and your beliefs when facing adversity.

Portraying the character and orchestrating the adversity is the writer's job.

Pauline Alldred said...

I agree with your last comment. As a reader, I want to see how characters overcome the challenges they face, whether the challenge is a lack of a job and poverty or a serial killer.

Ramona said...

Pauline, I think Scott is a fascinating figure. He tried to tout the expedition to the South Pole as a scientific one, and they did recover penguin eggs to study, but he was certainly a hero suffering from hubris.

Have you read Beryl Bainbridge's The Birthday Boys? Excellent book. Those men really came to life for me.

Warren Bull said...

I think one key element of a true hero is his/her reluctance to accept the label of "hero." On 9/11 while most people raced away from the towers a few people rushed toward them and later said they were, "just doing my job."

Pauline Alldred said...

Thanks for the book suggestion, Ramona. It sounds like something I'd enjoy reading. I agree with your assessment, Warren, for heroes who act bravely when everyone in the area is in danger. I'm guessing the hero or heroine doesn't go through a complicated mental process, weighing up the danger involved. They simply see their actions as what has to be done and the motivation comes from deep inside them so, when it's over,they don't understand the fuss since they didn't see any other option.